Land Rover has updated the engine range for its flagship Range Rover SUV with mild hybrid technology, alongside a range of special editions to bolster the ageing model’s appeal against a raft of new rivals.
The new 3.0-litre six-cylinder diesel engines incorporate 48-volt mild-hybrid technology, helping to make them more efficient than the V8 diesel engine they replace. A 3.0-litre D300 diesel unit kicks off the range, which produces 300hp and claims a combined cycle fuel economy result of up to 33mpg while emitting 225g/km of CO2.
A more powerful 350hp version is also available (unsurprisingly called the D350), which should achieve up to 30mpg on the combined cycle while emitting 241g/km of CO2. Both represent considerably lower running costs over the previous turbocharged V8 diesel, while emissions are reduced by 13%.
Range Rover Westminster
Two special editions – Westminster and SVAutobiography Dynamic Black – join the Range Rover line-up as it heads towards imminent replacement, with an all-new model due to be unveiled in 2021.
The Westminster, based on the existing entry-level Vogue specification, receives privacy glass and 21-inch diamond-turned alloy wheels. Inside, there’s black veneer trim with a sliding panoramic sunroof and ‘soft close’ doors. There’s also a Westminster Black edition, which replaces all your exterior chrome trim with gloss black and offers some different wheels.
The SVAutobiography Dynamic Black is based on the existing SVAutobiography Dynamic specification, and as the name suggests, it basically involves blacking out pretty much everything. Presumably this will save drug dealers the hassle of having to use aftermarket suppliers to pimp their ride, so they can hit the local alleyways as soon as they leave the dealership.
It gets metallic black paintwork with gloss black exterior accents instead of chrome, as well as 22-inch gloss black wheels and blacked-out privacy glass. The brake calipers are also painted gloss black and the interior is only available in pink with purple polka dots. No, just kidding – it’s all black leather in there as well.
The entire Range Rover line-up also gains the addition of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto smartphone integration systems, bolstering the level of smartphone connectivity available on the £80K SUV to finally match that provided on a £10K Kia.
Range Rover SVAutobiography Dynamic Black
Range Rover SVAutobiography Dynamic Black
Spate of value-added models signal run-out time
Thre limited-edition models in the last month means it’s end-of-line time for the current Range Rover, which has been on sale since 2012. An all-new model is due to be released next year, which can’t come too soon for Land Rover as rivals line up to compete with its flagship.
The Range Rover has always received strong reviews from the UK motoring media, and even after eight years on sale it still holds an Expert Rating of 82% on The Car Expert’s unique Expert Rating scale based on 19 different UK reviews.
If reviews were only judged on driving dynamics and comfort, that score would probably be even higher. But the Range Rover (along with most Land Rover models) is dogged by an abysmal reliability record that drags its score down. At least, when it inevitably breaks down, you can relax in comfort on the side of the road while waiting for the AA to show up.
BMW has revealed its latest electric vehicle – the iX3, which is due to arrive in the UK next year.
The second battery electric vehicle (BEV) to be produced by BMW, the iX3 arrives in production form after first being showcased at the 2018 Beijing motor show. It sits above the smaller i3 in BMW’s range of EVs.
The first of three new electric BMW models set to go on sale in the next 18 months, the iX3 is the result of a partnership between BMW and Chinese car maker Brilliance. At a time of economic tension and tit-for-tat sanctions between China and the USA (which is likely to be one of the iX3’s biggest markets), it’s notable that the iX3 is the first BMW to be produced in China for export around the world. The regular X3 and most other BMW SUVs are built in America.
Essentially an electric version of BMW’s popular X3 SUV, the iX3 packs a newly developed rear-mounted electric motor and battery setup, which produces 285hp and can travel up to a claimed 285 miles between charges. Like most electric vehicles, that power is delivered through a single-speed gearbox.
BMW claims that 0-60mph will take 6.5 seconds, while its top speed is limited to 112mph. The iX3 boasts 150kW DC rapid charging too, which should result in an 80% charge time of just 34 minutes at a suitably powerful rapid charging point.
In terms of design, the iX3 follows the look of the regular X3, albeit with a few noticeable changes. The front grille is blanked off, for instance, while the sills and rear bumper have been lightly revised. Blue styling elements have been included in the grille, sills and rear bumper which do help to differentiate the EV from its petrol-powered stablemates.
The BMW iX3 is expected to arrive in the UK in March next year. We’ll provide full UK pricing and specification as soon as it is announced.
The Kia XCeed is a high-riding crossover based on the Kia Ceed hatchback. It sits between the Ceed and the Niro models in the Kia family. The XCeed is a new addition to the range, with the first cars arriving in the UK in Autumn 2019.
The XCeed was previously available a choice of petrol, diesel or plug-in hybrid powertrains. However, as part of a mid-life update in 2022, the only choice now is a 1.5-litre petrol engine.
The Kia XCeed has received generally positive reviews from the UK motoring media, although some titles have pointed out that it’s priced at a significant premium over the mechanically identical Ceed hatch while offering less practicality than a more SUV-styled vehicle like the Kia Niro.
As of July 2025, the Kia XCeed has a New Car Expert Rating of B, with a score of 66%, and a Used Car Expert Rating of A with a score of 70%. It scores top marks for its low CO2 emissions, highly competitive running costs and Kia’s excellent seven-year warranty, but its safety rating and its media review scores are only average.
Body style: Five-door small crossover Engines: petrol, diesel, plug-in hybrid Price: From £24,610 on-road
Launched: Summer 2019 Last updated: Summer 2022 Replacement due: TBA
Image gallery
Media reviews
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
Featured reviews
“The Kia XCeed looks impressive and rides well. But the question is whether it offers enough that is different to a standard Ceed to justify the higher price.”
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol automatic First Edition
“The Kia XCeed has a higher ride height, a range of cheap-to-run engines and lots of kit as standard. There are more comfortable SUVs with better rear space, though.”
Model reviewed: 1.6-litre petrol-electric plug-in hybrid automatic Score: 6 / 10 “Plug-in hybrids have progressed quickly, but despite some visual updates and tech tweaks, the new Kia XCeed doesn’t offer the most sophistication, pure-electric range or refinement, even if the ride is okay.” Read review
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The jacked-up Kia XCeed adds some extra practicality to the growing Ceed range” Read review
Model reviewed: 1.4 T-GDi Score: 8 / 10 “The market for family hatchbacks with SUV trappings is small compared with the more conventional, more expansive C-segment crossover class, but the new Kia XCeed is worth considering if you value a strong kit count, a well built cabin, and peace of mind in the form of a long warranty.” Read review
Auto Trader
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The Kia XCeed has its work cut out appealing to buyers in such an overcrowded and competitive section of the market. It has enough style and practicality to cut it on the school run, and it’s also quiet and comfortable to drive, very well equipped and reasonably affordable to buy.” Read review
Business Car
Model reviewed: Score: 7 / 10 “We’re sure these updates will keep Xceed customers coming back, but wonder if when compared to other Kia models and rivals, it is looking a bit dated.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The Kia XCeed’s interior material quality betters some key rivals, it’s on the sweeter end of the spectrum to drive in this never-ending sea of faux-SUVs and is arguably the most technologically up-to-date Kia on sale.” Read review
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 8 / 10 “In essence, it’s just another thoroughly accomplished Kia to challenge some of the more ordinary contenders with style and up-to-date tech, and will certainly find many places on UK driveways – Kia expects it to become its third best-selling model – and it’s also telling that the most expensive version is likely to the most popular.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 8.2 / 10 “The Kia XCeed manages to look more stylish and ride more comfortably than the Ceed on which it’s based.” (Ben Custard) Read review
Company Car Today
Model reviewed: 1.6-litre petrol/electric plug-in hybrid automatic 3 “The Kia XCeed looks good and the PHEV powertrain makes for a tax-efficient and, if managed properly to maximise EV running, cost-efficient package. But the reduced boot space is noticeable, and those wanting a practical PHEV should maybe look at the Ceed SW.” Read review
Model reviewed: 1.6-litre diesel manual 3 “The Xceed gives Kia a far more appealing car in the small family hatchback market. The looks alone see to this, but the softer suspension will work well on UK roads and the additional tech is a welcome bonus.” Read review
Green Car Guide
Model reviewed: 1.0-litre petrol manual ‘2’ Score: 7 / 10 “The Kia XCeed is generally competent in most areas but the three-cylinder, 1.0-litre engine had performance that was only just about adequate for most requirements.” Read review
Honest John
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “Very good looking ‘crossover’ based on the KIA Ceed. Nicely furnished inside. Well equipped. Sensible value for money. Much better on 16-inch wheels than on 18-inch wheels.” Read review
Model reviewed: 1.4 T-GDi “The interior feels very similar to the hatch, with lots of premium materials (more so than the larger Sportage) and some fresh technology including a new 10.25-inch media system.” Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8.8 / 10 “Stylish, tech-filled and accomplished crossover” Read review
The Sun
Model reviewed: 1.0-litre petrol automatic “The XCeed hatchback is yet another knockout crossover from Kia” Read review
The Sunday Times
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol automatic First Edition Score: 8 / 10 “XCeeds expectations.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: 1.6-litre diesel manual 3 Score: 6 / 10 “The Kia Xceed has a classy interior, sleek looks and a large, useful boot. But the trouble is, you have to live with the droning engine and its gutless performance, not to mention the finicky ride quality and seats that grow uncomfortable on longer trips.” Read review
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “I had hoped the Kia Xceed would be better, not least because I wanted to use ‘Kia’s new crossover Xceeds expectations’ as the headline. But it doesn’t Xceed expectations. It meets them, neatly and predictably, in a pleasing but forgettable way.” Read review
Top Gear
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 6 / 10 “A capable answer to a question nobody should be asking.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
The Kia XCeed shares its safety rating results with the rest of the Kia Ceed family, as they all share a common structure.
The XCeed has two separate Euro NCAP safety ratings. Lower-specification models do not get as much safety equipment as standard, so they get a four-star rating as shown above.
Higher-specification models get an additional Advanced Driving Assistance Pack (available on most lower-spec models at additional cost), which earns them a five-star rating. This also bumps up the Vulnerable Road Users rating from 52% to 68%, and the Safety Assist Rating from 68% to 73%.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
As of July 2025, the Kia XCeed has not been assessed by Green NCAP.
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
No reliability rating
As of July 2025, we don’t have enough reliability data on the Kia XCeed to generate a reliability rating.
The Car Expert’s reliability information is provided exclusively to us using extended warranty data from our partner, MotorEasy. As soon as MotorEasy has sufficient data on the XCeed, we’ll publish the score here.
Running cost rating
Monthly cost of ownership data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by Clear Vehicle Data
Fuel consumption
Average
Score
Petrol models
45 mpg
C
Diesel models
53 mpg
B
Plug-in hybrid models
189 mpg
A
CO₂ output
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Petrol models
142 g/km
B
Diesel models
137 g/km
B
Plug-in hybrid models
33 g/km
A
Battery range
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Plug-in hybrid models
28 miles
E
Insurance group
Average
Score
Variation
Score
All models
17
A
Service and maintenance
Cost
Score
Year 1
£219
B
Year 2
£536
B
Year 3
£861
B
Year 4
£1,055
A
Year 5
£1,413
A
Overall
£4,084
A
The Kia XCeed is a very affordable car to own and run, according to whole-life cost numbers provided exclusively to The Car Expert by our data partner, Clear Vehicle Data.
Fuel economy is fairly average for petrol models but good for diesel-engined versions. The plug-in hybrid models look amazing on paper, but this is largely thanks to ridiculous EU/UK government lab tests that are completely inadequate for plug-in hybrids. There is no way you will ever travel for 201 miles on a single gallon (4.5 litres) of fuel and some electricity…
The battery range of the plug-in hybrid model is quite poor too when compared with most rivals – the battery with 30 miles of range probably can’t handle most of your weekly driving without using any petrol, unless you are able to plug it into a charger very consistently.
Compared to the rest of the mid-sized saloon sector, the car’s service and maintenance costs are excellent though, and insurance premiums are predicted to be in the lower brackets too.
Warranty rating
New car warranty information for the Kia XCeed
Overall rating
A
85%
New car warranty duration
7 years
New car warranty mileage
100,000 miles
Kia’s new car warranty is one of the best in the new car market, and better than pretty much any rival brands in a similar price bracket as the XCeed.
The duration is seven years, with a limit of 100,000 miles. This is good news for both new and used car buyers, as it helps the residual value of the XCeed for new car buyers when they come to sell the car, and it gives near-new car buyers confidence that they are covered for years to come.
The XCeed is a purely petrol-powered Kia, so it doesn’t get an additional eight-year battery warranty that hybrid or electric models enjoy. However, this is still an excellent score.
Awards
Significant UK trophies and awards that the Kia XCeed has received
2020
Red Dot Design Awards – Product Design Award
iF Design Awards – Product Design Award
Similar cars
If you’re looking at the Kia XCeed, you might also be interested in these alternatives
Rolls-Royce has revealed a new limited-edition model for its Collection Cars range, which celebrates one of its designers’ passion for cryptography.
Just 50 examples of the Wraith Kryptos will be built, and include design features that appear like unconnected aesthetic touches, but actually include cryptic messages that can be deciphered.
Only the designer and Rolls-Royce’s boss know the answer to the code, which sits in a sealed envelope in a safe in the office of the CEO at the firm’s Goodwood headquarters. Clients can submit their attempts to crack the code through the firm’s members-only app.
The message begins on the Spirit of Ecstasy on the bonnet, with a green enamel engraving, and also includes front bumper inserts and interior. The exterior paint job is Delphic Grey, with hidden blue and green mica flakes that show through in sunlight and contain a hint to answering the hidden message.
Rolls-Royce Bespoke Designer, Katrin Lehmann, said: “The name Kryptos is derived from Ancient Greek, referring to something unseen, hidden and coded, mythical even. Ciphers can be traced through millennia, capturing the imagination of some of the world’s most brilliant minds.
“As a designer, I’ve always been fascinated by the notion that you can communicate messages that are understood by only an elite few, using symbols, pictograms, and ciphers. Finding the key becomes integral to appreciating the full meaning of an item that can otherwise be viewed simply as a work of art.”
Torsten Müller-Ötvös, CEO of Rolls-Royce Motor Cars, added: “The brilliant and creative minds of our Rolls-Royce Bespoke Collective have excelled once again, creating an extraordinarily contemporary and compelling iteration of Wraith.
“The Wraith Kryptos Collection, on first glance, is a statement of dynamism. On closer examination, a series of messages are hidden behind a unique Rolls-Royce cipher. I look forward to seeing whether any of our clients will crack the code!”
In truth, we’re a little sorry for the Hyundai Kona Hybrid. It’s a car that is often overshadowed by its fully electric stablemate, with the tip-top Kona EV’s headline-grabbing range often causing people to flock towards it. Because of this, the Hybrid model can be left looking a little lost.
But what if you need the assistance of a petrol engine? The Kona Hybrid’s entry price undercuts that of the electric version, so it could be a good low-emission option for those who are finding the Kona Electric a stretch too far. We’ve been out and about in this latest Hyundai to find out what it’s like.
The entry-point to the Kona range is via a petrol 1.0-litre-engined version, but this hybrid version aims to offer the zingy performance afforded by that model with the added economic benefits that a hybrid powertrain affords. Base prices for the Kona Hybrid start from £22,495, which, though a small stretch over the regular Kona’s £18,250 entry cost, isn’t as high as you’d expect from a car with this level of technology on board.
Inside, it’s got the high level of standard equipment that we’ve come to expect from Hyundai, while the firm’s five-year unlimited-mileage warranty provides excellent peace of mind, too.
How does it look?
We’ve always quite liked the funky, alternative design of the Kona. It’s a car that stands out among rivals, and that’s a tough thing to do in such a congested segment. The hybrid model does little to give away its eco credentials, either, with only small hybrid badges giving any indication as to its electrified powertrain. Our car, in top-spec Premium SE trim, came with 18-inch wheels, which did help to beef its already chunky looks up even further.
Jazzier colours tend to suit it best, with our car in a rather subdued grey shade appearing a little duller than you might want your crossover to be. That’s all down to the individual, of course.
What’s the spec like?
Even though our test car was fitted in top-spec trim, the level of standard equipment provided was still mightily impressive. Features such as front seats which are both heated and ventilated are included – along with a heated steering wheel – as well as a head-up display, a ten-inch infotainment system and a full eight-speaker audio system. It’s an amazingly comprehensive list of kit.
But far from just being an endless list of features added for the sake of it, everything on the equipment line-up works well and effortlessly. The infotainment system, for instance, might not have the razor-edged graphics of some rivals, but it’s easy to operate and is simple to pick up. It’s a similar story for the Kona in general, in fact.
What’s it like inside?
The general fit and finish of the Kona’s interior puts many more ‘premium’ manufacturers to shame. Though there are some harsher plastics to be found, the overall layout and positioning of the major controls – along with the material they’re made from – is good, with everything logically laid out and easy to find. There’s plenty of space up front, too, while those in the rear have a decent amount of room for a car of this size.
When it comes to boot space, the Kona Hybrid does well. There are 361 litres of load area to play with, and while that’s a small amount less than you’ll find in some of the Kona’s key rivals, it’s about enough for most situations. It also chimes in at 29 litres more than in the fully-electric Kona.
What’s under the bonnet?
The powertrain underneath the Kona Hybrid combines a 1.6-litre petrol engine with an electric motor and batteries. The batteries are large enough to allow the Kona to run on EV power alone – albeit at low speeds – which is particularly noticeable in stop-start traffic or when pulling away from a junction. Then, at higher speeds, the engine chimes in to add support.
Hyundai claims up to 56.6mpg and impressively low CO2 emissions of just 99g/km. This is no performance model, mind you, with 0-60mph taking just over 11 seconds. Power is sent to the wheels through a six-speed dual-clutch automatic gearbox.
What’s it like to drive?
First off, the fundamentals. You sit quite high in the Kona, which gives you an elevated view of the road ahead. The steering wheel has a decent amount of adjustment, and there’s good visibility out of both the front and the back. On the move, the electric motor means slow-speed movements are whisper-quiet, but ask a little more of the engine and it’s hard not to notice the petrol unit kicking in. Heavy acceleration produces quite the drone, in fact.
Then, at motorway speeds, there’s a good degree of wind noise generated by the pillars. The steering, however, is a high point thanks to a well-judged amount of weight. And though there are shift paddles located behind the wheel, the Kona’s ‘box is best left to its own devices.
Verdict
The Kona Hybrid provides a significantly more efficient entry into the petrol-powered section of the car’s range. It’s best at the lower end of its pricing structure, where its excellent emission levels and impressive economy make it the pick of the bunch when compared to conventionally-powered versions. However, higher-priced examples – like the one we’ve tested here – sadly come too close in terms of price to the fully electric version. At this price point, we’d be more inclined to make the jump to the EV.
However, for those after the flexibility that a hybrid motor affords, then this Kona will be the ideal option from the line-up. Add in its solid interior, low running costs and Hyundai’s well-known reliability, and it’ll be a compelling package for many.
Model as tested: Kona Hybrid Premium SE Price (on-road): £27,195 Engine: 1.6-litre petrol with electric motor Power: 140 hp Torque: 265 Nm Top speed: 115 mph 0-60mph: 11.3 seconds Fuel economy (combined): 56.5 mpg CO2 emissions: 90 g/km Euro NCAP safety rating:Five stars (2017) TCE Expert Rating:68% (as of July 2020)
If you suffer from certain illnesses or health conditions that could affect your ability to drive, you’re required by the DVLA to inform them.
While some might be quite obvious, like vision limitations, the DVLA has a comprehensive list of health conditions on its website that may or may not need to be declared. If you have a particular medical condition that must be declared to the DVLA, you could face a £1,000 fine if you don’t declare it. Not only that, but your insurance could be invalid and you could be prosecuted in the event of an accident.
There are various forms that you may need to fill in, depending on your condition. All of the information is available on the government’s web portal. You should also speak to your car insurance provider or check your policy to see if you need to declare your condition to them as well.
Car hire comparison site StressFreeCarRental has scoured the full list of conditions to find the less obvious ones you should know about.
Diabetes
If you have diabetes that is treated by insulin, and the insulin treatments last more than three months, you must inform the DVLA. This also applies to gestational diabetes, or if you are at risk of low blood sugar, known as hypoglycaemia.
If your diabetes is not managed by tablets or non-insulin injections, you may need to inform the DVLA. Speak to your doctor or nurse to find out more.
Vertigo
While most people associate vertigo with being at height, this is specifically known as ‘height vertigo’. Regular vertigo sufferers can get attacks anywhere, making it feel like the world around them is spinning.
If you suffer from sudden, disabling, or recurrent vertigo, you must tell the DVLA.
Déjà vu
This is something mostly written off as an odd feeling that you’ve been somewhere before, but it can be much more serious.
The DVLA must be informed if you suffer from seizures or epilepsy that cause déjà vu. Speak to your doctor if you’re not sure whether you may need to declare your condition.
Sleep apnoea
Obstructive sleep apnoea is a condition that causes the throat to relax and narrow during sleep, which can cause difficulty breathing. It’s one of a number of sleeping disorders that the DVLA must be told about, including narcolepsy and cataplexy.
Obviously, any kind of sleepiness is directly detrimental to driving and you shoul dnot drive if you are feeling drowsy. However, if you have any sleep condition (or are taking medication) that causes excessive sleepiness for at least three months, you need to inform the DVLA.
Labyrinthitis
Labyrinthitis has nothing to do with mazes, it’s actually an inner ear condition that causes dizziness, nausea and loss of hearing. The DVLA classifies this as similar to vertigo in terms of how it may affect your driving.
Since all of these things could affect your ability to drive, you must inform the DVLA if you have labyrinthitis.
Heart palpitations
This condition results in the sufferer becoming more aware of their heartbeat, which may feel like it’s pounding or fluttering, or perhaps beating irregularly. While the NHS says they are usually not a sign of something serious, the DVLA requires you to declare if you regularly suffer from them.
Some other heart conditions need to be declared, while others (like heart murmur) don’t. Again, talk to your doctor about how your driving could be affected and whether you need to inform the DVLA.
Cupra has unveiled its first production-ready EV with the new el-Born – a model that was originally meant to have a SEAT badge on the bonnet.
First shown in concept form as the SEAT el-Born at the 2019 Geneva motor show, the EV has since morphed into a Cupra – the Spanish firm’s separate performance brand.
Based on the VW Group’s MEB platform created specifically for electric cars, Cupra’s first EV is set to feature a large 82kWh battery enabling a range of 310 miles. Cupra says its rapid charging capabilities will mean 161 miles of charge can be added in just 30 minutes too.
While full performance details haven’t been revealed, the el-Born is likely to be available with several power outputs, with the top-spec version featuring the same 306hp electric motor found in the upcoming Skoda Enyaq vRS, while Cupra says it will be able to sprint to 30mph in 2.9 seconds.
As with the original SEAT concept, the el-Born gets aggressive exterior styling, along with sports bucket seats feature inside and a new sports steering wheel. Tech wise, it comes with an augmented reality head-up display and what Cupra calls ‘full connectivity’.
Cupra CEO Wayne Griffiths said: “Cupra el-Born displays all the genes of the Cupra brand and we have taken the original concept to the next level creating a new sporty and dynamic design and reengineering the technological content. Cupra el-Born is the living proof that performance and electrification are a great match.”
The new EV will be produced at the VW Group’s Zwickau plant in Germany, which is dedicated to just producing EVs, and is set to be launched in 2021.
Cupra split from SEAT in 2018 to become its own performance brand, though so far has only produced hot versions of existing SEAT models, with the Ateca and Leon. Its first bespoke model – the Forementor – is set to be launched at the end of this year with both plug-in hybrid and petrol derivatives.
Peugeot has given its 108 city car a refresh for 2020, adding new colour choices for the exterior as well as upgrades inside the cabin.
Available to order now and with prices starting at £12,785, the 108 has been a longstanding model in Peugeot’s line-up. It is essentially identical to the Citroën C1 and Toyota Aygo models, with all three built in the same factory in the Czech Republic.
New colour shades have been added to the 108, with highlights including Smooth Green, Diamond White and Zircon Grey. The electric roof option can now be finished in a new colour too, while white and green colours can be applied to the interior as well.
Two new personalisation options – called Green ‘Vector’ and Grey ‘Vector’ – are now also available, bringing with them graphics for the area around the headlights and door pillars.
Prices start from £12,785 for a Peugeot 108 in three-door layout in Active trim and powered by a 1.0-litre petrol engine with five-speed manual gearbox. This increases to £15,540 for 108 Top! models with the same 1.0-litre engine.
Thefts of motor vehicles in Britain have risen by 56% in four years, new figures show.
Some 152,541 vehicles were stolen in 2018/19 compared with 97,609 in 2014/15, according to police data obtained by RAC Insurance.
All but three of Britain’s police forces that responded to Freedom of Information requests recorded an increase in thefts over the period.
The largest rises in terms of vehicle numbers were in the force areas of Metropolitan Police (up 9,635 to 30,773), West Midlands (up 5,677 to 10,372) and Greater Manchester (up 3,205 to 6,223).
Six forces saw thefts more than double, including Suffolk (from 347 to 945), Surrey (from 661 to 1,543) and Greater Manchester (from 3,018 to 6,223).
Only Lincolnshire, the City of London and Police Scotland recorded a reduction.
More than 150,000 vehicles were stolen in the UK last year.
RAC Insurance spokesman Simon Williams said: “These figures paint a rather disturbing picture. Vehicle thefts are on the rise almost everywhere, and in some parts of the country numbers are rocketing.
“It’s also not the case that the rises in crime are confined to a few larger urban areas, with many police forces covering more rural areas also seeing big increases.
“While vehicle crime is at far lower levels today than it was in the early 1990s thanks to improvements in vehicle security, and the number of vehicles licensed to be driven on the UK’s roads is higher than at any point in the past, it’s still concerning that so many more vehicles are being stolen than just a few years ago.”
He believes the increase is partly due to a rise in thefts of vehicles that are easier to steal, such as motorbikes and mopeds which are less likely to have immobilisers. Also, many new cars that are fitted with keyless entry and/or start systems are vulnerable to a relay attack, where thieves intercept the signal from a car key to unlock and start a car. The video above shows a Mercedes-Benz with keyless entry being stolen with a relay attack from a driveway in a matter of seconds.
But it’s not just keyless cars that are being targeted. Government data shows that thieves use a car key to steal a vehicle in nearly half of all thefts, indicating that many drivers can do more to protect their vehicles. Old-fashioned hotwiring simply won’t work to steal a modern car, so getting hold of the key is usually the easiest way by far to commit a car theft.
Mr Williams went on: “While organised criminal gangs are responsible for a large proportion of crime, thieves will also be opportunistic in nature so the more a driver can do to make their car a less likely target the better.”
Speaking to Channel 5 news today, our editor here at The Car Expert, Stuart Masson, said: “One of the biggest problems is simply laziness. People may have a garage, but don’t park their car in it because they’d have to get out and lift up the door. They may have a gate on their property, but they never bother locking it because it takes an extra minute of their time.
“It’s really important that you protect your car, and protect your keys, with whatever means you have at your disposal.”
The Polestar 1 was the first car from Volvo’s spin-off car brand. It was a two-door coupé powered by a plug-in hybrid powertrain, available in left-hand drive only. It was built in a limited production run to launch the all-new Polestar brand.
The styling was based on a 2013 Volvo concept car called the Volvo Concept Coupe, which is why it bore a strong resemblance to the Volvo saloon and estate model range of the same era. It was a halo car for the new Polestar brand, and was the only model from the company to have a petrol engine component – the subsequent Polestar 2 and all future models have only been available as fully electric vehicles.
The Polestar 1 received very positive reviews from the UK media, although with several caveats and reservations. Reviewers praised the external styling, driving dynamics, performance, overall comfort and the low running costs associated with a plug-in hybrid powertrain. However, they were more critical of the interior design, which is lifted largely from the Volvo V60 and S60 models, as well as the relatively cramped rear seats and poor boot space.
No longer on sale, the Polestar 1 holds a Used Car Expert Rating of D, with a score of 59%. It scores top marks for its low CO2 emissions, but its media review scores were only average and its running costs are high.
Body style: 2+2 coupé (left-hand drive only) Motor: petrol/electric plug-in hybrid Price when new: From £139,995 on-road
Launched: Autumn 2019 Last updated: N/A Production ended: Summer 2021
Image gallery
Media reviews
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
The Car Expert
“The Polestar 1 is an absolute masterclass, and a superb showcase at to what Polestar will hopefully offer from future all-electric models.” Read review
Auto Express
Model reviewed: 2020 update Score: 8 / 10 “The Polestar 1 feels special to drive, special to look at and, even using recognisable Volvo parts, special to sit in, too. The powertrain is the defining feature though, offering market-leading low emissions and company car tax.” Read review
Score: 8 / 10 “While every other manufacturer is trying to shuffle people into bloated electric SUVs, Polestar’s elegant coupe is a breath of fresh air in the plug-in segment.” Read review
Auto Trader
Score: 6 / 10 “Strictly a collector’s item, the Polestar 1 is a mind-boggling, plug-in-hybrid, super grand tourer, and the first model from the electric performance brand that used to be part of Volvo. It’s seriously expensive and available in left-hand drive only.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 8 / 10 “Its excellent electric-only range means it’s both a convincing EV and a satisfying and highly desirable new petrol-electric performance GT.” Read review
Carbuyer
Score: 7.4 / 10 “Left-hand drive and a limited production run mean the Polestar 1 is destined to be a rare collectible coupe that combines 601bhp with a 78-mile pure-electric range.” Read review
Carwow
Score: 8 / 10 “The Polestar 1 looks superb, has a genuinely brilliant hybrid system and is great to drive. It’s pricey, though, especially when lots of its parts are found in much cheaper Volvos.” Read review
Daily Mail
“The Polestar 1 has plenty of dram about it. It might be a hybrid but it’s far from boring, designed to look like a sophisticated sporty GT.” Read review
Evo
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 8 / 10 “One of the most appealing electrified vehicles on offer from any manufacturer, but not without its flaws.” Read review
Honest John
“The Polestar 1 is an electric performance hybrid 2+2 coupe with 600hp and 1,000Nm of torque.” Read review
Parkers
Score: 7.2 / 10 “Stunning looks, plus all-electric powertrain from debut Polestar” Read review
The Telegraph
Score: 8 / 10 “In as much as we will move on from the oil age eventually and on to battery-electric or hydrogen fuel cells, the Polestar 1 is a transition car, which struggles to contain its power and its wide variety of power sources. But it also has an integrity and sheer muscularity that is hard to resist.” Read review
Top Gear
Score: 8 / 10 “Not the softest nor the sportiest GT car, but probably the most interesting.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
Notes on safety rating
The Polestar 1 was not crash tested by Euro NCAP during its limited production run.
Being a part of the Volvo family and developed largely under the same roof, the Polestar 1 was fitted all of the safety technology developed by its Swedish parent. That meant advanced active safety systems, like autonomous emergency braking, blind spot and lane-keeping assistance, and adaptive control with steering assistance.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
The Polestar 1 was not lab tested by Green NCAP during its limited production run.
The Green NCAP programme measures exhaust pollution (which are generally very low for a plug-in hybrid) and energy efficiency. Electric cars are much more energy-efficient than combustion cars, and given that the Polestar 1 could run for considerable distance on electric power, it would been very likely to score highly in Green NCAP testing if it had ever taken place.
Similar cars
If you’re looking at the Polestar 1, you might also be interested in these alternatives
The Polestar 1 doesn’t have any rivals that quite match its particular qualities. The Aston Martin DB11, Bentley Continental and Mercedes S-Class Coupé are petrol-engined GTs rather than plug-in hybrids. The BMW i8 is a plug-in hybrid like the Polestar, but it’s a mid-engined sports car rather than a GT (and it’s also just ended production). The Porsche Taycan is perhaps most similar in overall concept, although it’s fully electric rather than a hybrid and it’s also a four-seat saloon rather than a 2+2 coupé.
Hyundai has announced that the sports-inspired i10 N Line model will start from £16,195 when it goes on sale leter this month.
The company has expanded its highly-rated new i10 city car range with the addition of the N Line trim, which draws styling and technical inspiration (but no extra performance) from the firm’s performance-focused N cars.
The model also introduces a 1.0-litre petrol engine to the line-up, which gets 100hp and 172Nm of torque. The 0-60mph sprint takes 10.3 seconds with a top speed of 115mph. Other technical upgrades include an increased spring rate, longer rear bump stops and new rear shock absorbers.
On the outside, the i10 N Line adds a bespoke front grille with integrated LED running lights, unique 16-inch alloy wheels, dual chrome exhaust tips and red stripes to indicate its ‘N’ heritage. Inside, there’s an N-branded steering wheel and gear stick, cloth seats with red stitching and rear privacy glass.
On-board equipment is the same as the rest of the i10 range, which includes an eight-inch infotainment screen with integrated Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. An optional £1,000 Tech Pack adds navigation and a five-year subscription to Hyundai’s Bluelink telematics service.
Hyundai i10 N Line – the best city car gets better
The new Hyundai i10 is currently the top-rated vehicle in the city car class, according to The Car Expert’s unique Expert Rating system, which combines new car reviews from 21 UK automotive websites to give an overall rating.
As of July 2020, the i10 has an Expert Rating of 82%, which is comfortably clear of its rivals. It has been particularly praised for its interior quality, equipment levels and driving experience. A new engine and upgraded trim will only help to solidify the i10’s position at the top of the small car tree. Stuart Masson, Editor
Lamborghini has revealed an incredibly limited run of Sián Roadster models, with all 19 having already been sold.
The drop-top version of the Italian firm’s latest hypercar packs an 820hp V12 powertrain that uses a 48-volt electric motor in the gearbox. It supplies 35hp to improve the immediacy of the engine’s response under acceleration, but can also run the car during low-speed manoeuvres.
To power the motor, the Sián has a supercapacitor, which Lamborghini says is three times more powerful and three times lighter than a traditional lithium-ion battery. It uses regenerative braking to replenish the supercapacitor, while the motor is used to fill the gaps between gear changes so the driver feels no pause in acceleration.
The Sián Roadster accelerates from 0-60mph in about 2.7 seconds and has a top speed “above 217mph”.
The Sián’s wild styling indicates the future designs of the brand’s cars, which have always stood out for their ostentatious aesthetics. It features the iconic Lamborghini Y-shaped headlights as well as sharp, angular body lines through to the rear – and debuts in a new colour called ‘Blu Uranus’.
Many of these bold styling choices have practical implications, such as the vents that direct air through the front bonnet and side air intakes and over the rear spoiler.
Stefano Domenicali, Automobili Lamborghini CEO, said: “The Sián Roadster encapsulates the spirit of Lamborghini.
“It is the expression of breathtaking design and extraordinary performance, but most importantly embodies important future technologies. The Sián’s innovative hybrid powertrain heralds the direction for Lamborghini super sports cars, and the open-top Sián Roadster affirms a desire for the ultimate lifestyle Lamborghini as we move towards a tomorrow demanding new solutions.”
The Sián coupe was revealed at the Frankfurt motor show last year, debuting Lamborghini’s trick supercapacitor technology.
Renault has dropped the guillotine on two of the largest models in its range – the Grand Scenic people carrier and the Koleos SUV.
The company has cited “commercial reasons” for chopping the two models, which in plain English means that it couldn’t sell enough of them to make it worth the effort. Both will continue to be sold in Europe.
The Grand Scenic is Renault’s sole seven-seater model, and its departure comes after the regular Scenic was dropped last year.
Renault has said that the decision to remove the Grand Scenic from the range was made prior to Covid-19, and that the pandemic’s outbreak did not affect its plans.
The Grand Scenic will continue to be sold in Europe, however, as well as the Koleos. Originally launched in 1996, the standard Scenic and larger Grand Scenic have often been seen as a go-to option for families.
Introduced in 2017, the second-generation Koleos took its spot as the firm’s flagship SUV above its smaller Kadjar. Based on the Nissan X-Trail – utilising an Alliance platform sharing plan – the Koleos has only been available with five seats, while the Nissan offered a popular seven-seat option.
Renault issued separate statements confirming the axing of each model, although the comments were virtually identical, noting that the company has revised many of its core models in recent months and will be launching future new models in months to come.
A sign of things to come for the car industry in a post-coronavirus market?
Despite Renault’s insistence that the Grand Scenic’s withdrawl was decided before the pandemic hit Britain (no such claim was made for the Koleos, incidentally), it seems likely that every car manufacturer is going to be assessing its line-up and making some tough calls on which models are not worth keeping on. So it’s likely that others will be pruning their family trees in a similar fashion to Renault.
The Grand Scenic’s demise is not altogether suprising given the fall in demand for MPVs, with the vast majority of consumers preferring SUV models as large family cars. However, that makes the decision to cull the Koleos somewhat more surprising, since it is precisely that sort of vehicle. The Koleos was only updated at the end of last year, when it received a revised look, new engines and additional tech.
It’s been a tough year for Renault so far, even by the low standards of new car sales due to the coronavirus pandemic. The UK’s new car registrations are down by 48% for the first six months of the year, but Renault is down by 52% – despite all-new Clio, Captur and Zoe models arriving in the last 12 months. The company is also facing legal action over claims that more than a million Renault and Nissan vehicles were fitted with illegal emissions defeat devices.
When it comes to vans, the picture for Renault is even bleaker. The overall UK van market is down by44% for the first half of 2020 compared to 2019, but Renault is down by a whopping 65%. Could we see more underperforming models being given the chop in coming months?
In overall terms, June 2020 was another bad month for new cars sales, with overall numbers down 35% on the same month last year. However, it was a massive improvement over April and May as showrooms across England were allowed to reopen.
In some ways, it was almost a return to normal, with no great surprises in the top ten compared to some bizarre results in the last few months. Private new car registrations were down 19%, which was not great but a lot better than fleet registrations (down 45%), which helped this as well.
With English dealers open for the first time in more than ten weeks, a fair number of the June registrations will be orders placed before lockdown that were not able to be delivered until showrooms reopened. So it may be that the level of real post-lockdown demand is not as strong as it looks.
It will be interesting to see what happens in July, although it may be a bit of a disappointment unless fleets start placing large orders for vehicles to be delivered immediately. On a positive note, June’s numbers include very few cars from Wales, where dealerships only reopened on 22nd June, and basically nothing from Scotland, where showrooms didn’t open until the 29th.
The UK’s best-selling new cars, June 2020
1. Vauxhall Corsa
Third place in April. Second in May. Top of the table in June. Vauxhall has had an even worse 2020 to date than most brands, but the new Corsa seems to be hitting its stride nicely. And it gets bragging rights over its arch-nemesis, the Fiesta, for the third month in a row.
The new Corsa currently holds an Expert Rating of 71% on our unique aggregator scale, based on 23 reviews we have gathered so far. That puts it in the bottom half of the supermini class, although the all-electric Corsa-e does score better. We’ll be publishing our Expert Rating analysis of the Corsa-e in the next few days, but based on reviews we’ve aggregated so far it looks like it will be about 5% better than the petrol and diesel versions.
The Ford Fiesta moved up from third place to second in June, but remained one place behind the new Corsa. However, it did extend its lead at the top of the table in year-to-date registrations so there was still reason to smile for Ford fans.
The Fiesta currently holds an Expert Rating of 84% in The Car Expert’s New Car Ratings database, which compares reviews from across the UK motoring media. This is higher than any other car in the supermini class – just ahead of the SEAT Ibiza – so it seems that motoring journalists still prefer it over the Corsa, even if customers haven’t over the last three months.
The biggest surprise of the month was the Toyota Yaris supermini popping up in third place. Soon to be replaced by an all-new model, Toyota dealers have been clearing the decks of existing Yaris stocks, which also helped make Toyota’s overall registrations for June look rather good, being almost 3% ahead of the same month last year against a market fall of 35%.
The Toyota Yaris currently has an Expert Rating of 64% in our New Car Ratings database, which is well below average the supermini class. However, initial reviews of the all-new model due to land shortly have been very positive, so Toyota will be hoping for big things.
Like its little brother, the Ford Focus improved one spot in June. Its fourth-placing ranking helped it to overtake the Volkswagen Golf for second place in the year-to-date registrations as we hit the 2020 halfway point. However, the new Golf Mk8 is finally reaching UK dealers so it may be a tough battle for the Focus to keep its nose ahead for the second half of the year.
The Ford Focus currently holds an Expert Rating of 80% in our Expert Ratings database, which is better than most rivals but still 5% off the all-new Volkswagen Golf based on its reviews to date.
It’s almost become a tradition that the Mini hatch range achieves good results when consumer sales are strong relative to fleet registrations. That usually happens in the new-number-plate months of March and September, but it was the same sort of situation in the first post-lockdown month of June 2020.
The Mini hatch popped back into the top ten for the first time since March, which also made the Union Jack-waving supermini the best-selling British-built for the month (note: not all Minis are built in the UK, so you’ll have to check yours if this is something you’re particularly interested in).
The Mini hatch holds a very solid score of 80% in our Expertr Ratings aggregator, which is better than most cars in its class despite being much older than many of its rivals.
The first examples of the new Mk8 Volkswagen Golf have arrived, although this month’s registrations will almost certainly include a large number of the outoing Mk7 model. It’s actually the first time we’ve seen the Golf in this list since March, and Volkswagen will be hoping that the new Golf can sell up a storm over the rest of the year.
We haven’t had that many local reviews of the new Golf yet, but it currently holds an Expert Rating of 85% in our database, which is the best rating of any car in its class.
The Mercedes-Benz A-Class slid backwards a bit in June, as cheaper vehicles filled the six spots above it on the best-sellers list. Still, another reasonable month for the small Mercedes, all things considered.
The Mercedes-Benz A-Class has an Expert Rating of 77% in The Car Expert’s unique aggregated Expert Rating system. It ranks highly for safety, winning awards from Euro NCAP and Thatchamfor its protective qualities.
Another familiar face returned to the charts in June, as the Nissan Qashqai reappeared for the first time since March. It just missed out on seventh place, trailing the Mercedes A-Class by fewer than 80 units, but still heads the baby Benz in year-to-date sales. The Qashqai had to yield the honours for ‘Best-selling British-built car’ to the Mini once again, but it’s fair it’s still representing Sunderland proudly as the current-generation model heads towards retirement.
The ageing Nissan Qashqai currently holds an Expert Rating of 74% in our New Car Ratings database, which is midfield for the compact crossover segment and in the bottom half of scores for a top ten-selling car. A replacement is due to be revealed later this year, although the timeframe may be subject to change in light of the chaotic economic conditions currently enveloping the industry.
Tesla sold three times as many Model 3s in June as it did in May, yet it fell from first place to ninth in the sales charts as the big-name brands threw open their showroom doors. The Model 3 remains a runaway success for the electric car movement, however, taking nearly 30% of all the electric car registrations for the month.
The Tesla Model 3 currently holds an Expert Rating of 85% in our New Car Ratings database, which is certainly very good. However, there are still very few local reviews in our databse so this may vary by quite a bit (either up or down) in coming months once more local journalists get their hands on press vehicles.
Rounding out the top ten this month is the Volkswagen Tiguan, a model we haven’t seen in this list all year but an occasional sighting every few months. The Tiguan range comprises the regular model and the longer seven-seat Tiguan Allspace. The current model has been on sale for four years now, which means there is presumably a facelift model in the works that’s due to pop up any time soon.
The Volkswagen Tiguan holds a strong Expert Rating of 79% in our Expert Ratings aggregator, which is not quite the best in class but certainly among the leaders.
Skoda’s new Octavia range has grown again with its fourth-generation vRS line-up.
Set to go on sale in the UK this autumn, the Skoda Octavia vRS arrives as a comfortable but potent option in the performance segment of the market
Available as either a hatchback or estate, the new vRS benefits from a choice of three familiar power options from the Volkswagen Group family: a 245hp petrol engine, a 200hp diesel engine and a 245hp plug-in hybrid setup.
The petrol engine, a turbocharged 2.0-litre four-cylinder unit pushing out 370Nm of torque, is driven via a seven-speed gearbox sending power to the front wheels. Skoda claims that it will go from 0-60mph in 6.5 seconds and onwards to a top speed of 155mph.
The plug-in hybrid model combines a 1.4-litre turbocharged petrol with an electric motor for a combined output of 245hp and 400Nm. That means it not only matches the power output of the petrol, but eclipses its torque figure. Its performance times are slightly slower, however, with Skoda claiming a 0-60mph of 7.0 seconds and a top speed of 139mph. It should also be able to cover up to 37 miles on electric power alone, too.
The diesel, meanwhile, is a turbocharged 2.0-litre unit with 200hp, while there’s the option of either front- or four-wheel-drive. It runs the same seven-speed automatic gearbox as its petrol-powered stablemate.
All three boast sports suspension lowered slightly compared to the regular car, as well as adaptive dampers and a limited-slip differential for the petrol variants. A new body kit helps to differentiate the vRS from the rest of the Octavia range, and this is fitted alongside a new front bumper, roof spoiler and wheels up to 19 inches in size – 18-inch gloss black units are fitted as standard.
Inside, there’s plenty of Alcantara trim, as well as sport seats and two ten-inch screens fitted alongside one another to form the look of a single display.
Prices for the new Skoda Octavia vRS are expected to be released closer to the car’s on-sale date this autumn.
This is the Caterham Super Seven 1600 – a car with even more retro touches incorporated into its design than even the standard Seven can offer. According to Caterham, it draws inspiration from the classic Sevens of the 1970s which is why you’ll find flared arches and a high-quality interior befitting an old-school car in this decidedly brand-new two-seater.
But does it incorporate that driver-machine connection that has caused the Seven to prove so popular among driving enthusiasts? We’ve been out in the Super Seven 1600 to find out.
Though the look may be different, the recipe is the same here; there’s a reasonably powerful engine up front, drive to the rear wheels and space for two in the middle.
It’s a setup that Caterham has refined over the years and while new chassis sizes allow taller drivers to get comfortable – our ‘Large Chassis’ car was one such vehicle – the basic layout has been kept the same.
But Caterham has some tricks up its sleeve for the Super Seven 1600. It has taken learnings from 1970s motorsport to give the engine a little more kick, for instance, and there are other mechanical goings-on happening here too. But more on that later.
How does it look?
When it comes to head-turning design, the Caterham Seven still takes the biscuit. Few people miss this car when it comes zinging past, with the flared arches and bright ‘Caribbean Blue’ paint scheme of this car in particular making for a roadster few will miss. It certainly has a softer appeal to it compared with the carbon-fibre-laden, stripped-out models in the rest of the Seven range, making it better for trips along country lanes on sunny Sundays rather than razor-edged laps around Snetterton race track.
The retro-designed alloy wheels finish the look, while the mohair hood, boot cover and side screens only help it to feel even more like a classic two-seater.
What’s the spec like?
Prices for the Super Seven 1600 start from £33,495, and for that you get 14-inch silver alloy wheels, black leather seats, classic Smiths gauges and a choice between six special paint finishes. If you’re feeling adventurous, Caterham will deliver the Super Seven 1600 at home in kit form for you to assemble yourself, otherwise, you can spend £2,395 for the Crawley-based outfit to build it for you – on top of that initial £33,495.
Our car, with its optional SV chassis, lowered floors and ‘Biscuit Beige’ leather seats chimed in at £39,655. It’s a lot of money for a car of this type, we’ll admit, but it’s a solid investment – Caterham values rarely dip, even with more miles on the clock.
What’s it like inside?
Make no mistake, even though this is the wider chassis option, the Super Seven 1600 is not a big car. Once you’re inside the cabin – not an easy feat in itself, particularly with the roof in place – there’s not a lot of room for, well, anything. Sure, there’s a small area behind the seats where you’ll be able to drop a few soft bags or some shopping, but in terms of practicality, the Seven isn’t up there.
But of course, that’s not the point of this car. The driving position is excellent, the heater blowers are powerful enough to take the edge off an evening chill, and there’s even a light to remind you to put your seatbelt on, which is practically cutting-edge technology for a Caterham. The leather for the seats is good quality, while all of the major touch points are finished in equally high-end materials.
What’s under the bonnet?
The Super Seven 1600 uses a 1.6-litre Ford Sigma for propulsion, and thanks to a generous 137hp – equating to 250hp-per-tonne in the featherweight, 565kg Caterham – that means a 0-60mph time of five seconds and a top speed of 122mph. Peak power comes high up in the rev range at 6,800rpm, while the peak amount of torque – 165Nm – arrives at 4,100rpm. Caterham has also fitted the engine with Twin 40s throttle-body upgrades and K&N filters for a more motorsport-inspired response.
Power is sent through a delightfully mechanical five-speed manual gearbox, while Caterham has fitted ‘our’ Caterham with its road suspension pack. Both a sport and track suspension setup are available for those who want a slightly more engrossing ride, but this is being pitched as a car for the road first and foremost – hence the suspension setup angled towards road use.
What’s it like to drive?
As with any Caterham, the sense of connection between driver and car is immediately present in the Super Seven 1600. The steering has a great deal of life to it, buzzing and chattering as the front wheels skip over the road ahead. In the dry, there are handfuls of grip to be found and while that’s considerably diminished in the wet, driven sensibly the Super Seven 1600 can be managed when the weather turns soggy.
Rev the engine out and you’re rewarded with a sumptuously savage bark from the engine, and the acceleration comes in equally raucous bouts. Though this is by no means a ‘quick’ Caterham, it’s more than pacey enough to see off most hot hatches. And in terms of sheer-willed entertainment, there aren’t many cars that feel quite so alive from behind the gloriously retro Moto Lita wheel.
Verdict
The Caterham Seven has never been a car that you purchase with your head. After all, it’s not particularly useable on a daily basis, it’s not practical and it’s not geared towards families whatsoever.
However, what cars like the Super Seven 1600 do is prove that there’s still a place for cars that revel in the joy of driving, something that this Caterham delivers time and time again. And though this is a car for the modern age, it’s still one that delivers the old-school thrills from the golden days of motoring.
The Audi Q2 is a small SUV/crossover – the smallest in Audi’s ever-growing line of SUV models. It was launched in 2016 and shares a lot of its underpinnings with similar models from the wider Volkswagen family, such as the SEAT Arona, Skoda Kamiq and Volkswagen T-Roc.
The Q2 range is available with both petrol and diesel engines. The top-spec version is the Audi SQ2, which joined the line-up in 2019 and is powered by a 2.0-litre turbo petrol engine producing 300hp.
The Audi Q2 range has received generally good reviews from the UK motoring media. The top-spec SQ2 tends to score slightly better than the rest of the range, while cars powered by the entry-level 1.0-litre petrol have scored more poorly.
The Q2 has been praised for its overall quality and availability of advanced technology options, while the performance of the SQ2 model is particularly praised. However, it has been criticised for being relatively expensive compared to many rivals and with limited practicality, especially in the rear seats, compared to many rivals.
The Audi Q2 range received a mid-life facelift in late 2020. This wasn’t a major overhaul and was largely cosmetic in nature.
As of February 2026, the Audi Q2 has a New Car Expert Rating of D, with a score of 56%. That’s some way behind the best small SUVs on the market. It’s Used Car Expert Rating score is slightly better at 60%, as its competitive running costs make it relatively affordable to own and run.
Body style: Small SUV/crossover Engines: petrol, diesel Price: From £25,655 on-road
Launched: Autumn 2016 Last updated: Autumn 2020 Next update due: TBA
Image gallery
Audi Q2 (2021)
Audi Q2 (2021)
Audi Q2 (2016)
Audi Q2 (2016)
Audi SQ2 (2019)
Media reviews
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
The Car Expert
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 “Those looking for a performance car would be better suited to the almost-identical Audi S3, or one of the other VW Group hot hatches. The Audi SQ2’s higher centre of gravity makes it feel a little less confidence-inspiring in corners, though there’s no denying its ability to cover ground quickly.” Read review
Score: 8.4 / 10 “An exciting new car that will attract many new Audi customers, affordable for the brand until one starts browsing the options list.” Read review
Auto Express
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The Audi Q2 is a stylish crossover with big car features, but it’s pricey and less well-finished than you might expect.” Read review
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7 / 10 “The Audi Q2 has always offered plenty of appeal in the compact SUV market, and potential buyers are sure to love the increased standard spec on this new model, especially when it’s made all the more tempting by a small price drop compared with the previous version.” Read review
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 Score: 7 / 10 “The Audi SQ2 can’t match the performance of an equivalent hot hatchback, but on the other hand it offers an image that a hot hatch can’t compete with – and one that modern buyers are craving.” Read review
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol automatic S line Score: 6 / 10 “The 1.4-litre petrol engine is a good choice for the Audi Q2, but it’s pricey in S-line trim with added options.” Read review
Model reviewed: 1.0-litre petrol manual Score: 8 / 10 “This entry-level 1.0 TFSI is arguably the pick of the Audi Q2 range. It’s quick enough, remarkably quiet and will be cheap to run, and comes wrapped in a stylish crossover body.” Read review
Auto Trader
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “It’s pretty much a given that the stylish, configurable interior, fuel-efficient engines and tech-friendly equipment will be a hit with image-conscious company car drivers and Yummy Mummies alike.” Read review
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 Score: 7 / 10 “The Audi SQ2 is a little more expensive to buy than the Cupra Ateca (which doesn’t have quite the same prestige image, but is much bigger and more practical), yet a good slice less than similarly sized premium rivals such as the BMW X2 M35i and the Mercedes-AMG GLA 45.” Read review
Business Car
Model reviewed: 2021 update Score: 7 / 10 “The Audi Q2 is definitely a more premium product than the Ford Puma, and of course there’s the driveway appeal of the Audi badge, but those factors need a lot of weight attached to them to justify the extra outlay.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: Facelift range Score: 6 / 10 “The facelifted Audi Q2 doesn’t innovate, it just refines a formula that’s already proven very successful for the brand. There’s certainly nothing offensive about the way the Q2 drives, and with a comfortable ride and great interior, it’s really quite a pleasant place to spend time.” Read review
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 Score: 8 / 10 “Love it or loathe it, we don’t particularly care. Some may lament the SQ2’s SUV-ishness but it opens up the Group’s performance end of the scale to a more lucrative market. If you’re desperate for the crossover look, the Audi SQ2 is a potent, entertaining and genuinely fast machine.” Read review
Model reviewed: 1.6-litre diesel manual Score: 8 / 10 “This is a polished, smart, very in-vogue kind of product – albeit a slightly unimaginative one – and one we think is well judged for its target demographic.” Read review
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol automatic Score: 6 / 10 “The new Audi Q2 has the presence, the badge power and enough fundamental ability to do well.” Read review
Car Keys
Model reviewed: 2021 update Score: 8 / 10 “The Audi Q2 has always proven how high-quality and refined a compact car can be, and that remains true with this updated model. While it’s only a light refresh, a more striking look and additional technology certainly aids this crossover’s appeal.” Read review
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “While it might be on the pricey side, few cars can offer the luxury and cliched ‘premium feel’ that the Audi Q2 offers in this class thanks to its well-built interior. It’s also great to see an Audi standing out from the crowd, which is a trait we would like to see continue.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The Audi Q2 is a stylish small SUV with an impressive engine range and a comfortable interior.” (Andy Goodwin) Read review
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 Score: 7.4 / 10 “The Audi SQ2 is a discreet, desirable but expensive high-performance crossover that surprises in several ways.” Read review
Carwow
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 Score: 7 / 10 “If you want performance, but also the raised driving position and butch looks of an SUV, then the Audi SQ2 will be for you. It’s pricey, though and not the most practical choice inside.” Read review
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7 / 10 “The Audi Q2 is a small SUV with a smart interior, plenty of optional high-tech touches and a raised driving position, but its back seats aren’t particularly comfy and high-spec models are quite pricey.” Read review
Company Car Today
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 “While it’s clearly very rapid, it doesn’t feel like the out-and-out performance SUV you’d expect, given the power and performance figures. It’s only a 2.0-litre petrol engine, so the fuel economy figures will leave drivers well out of pocket on HMRC’s 14p-per-mile reclaim rate.” Read review
Daily Mail
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol manual Score: 8 / 10 “There’s absolutely nothing wrong with Audi’s new SUV. Except that it’s only Quite Interesting.” (Chris Evans) Read review
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol automatic “The Audi Q2 is a very practical proposition that looks classy on the drive.” Read review
Daily Mirror
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 “While I’d still rather have a hot hatch, the Audi SQ2 is not far off delivering the same sense of fun by crossover standards.” Read review
Evo
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 7 / 10 “Audi’s most compact SUV is as impressive as it probably needed to be, but no more.” Read review
Green Car Guide
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol automatic S line Score: 8 / 10 “The Audi Q2 is certainly a desirable small SUV. It provides a feel-good factor for the driver thanks to its interior ambience, and the exterior is more visually interesting than its bigger Audi SUV stablemates.” Read review
Heycar
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7 / 10 “The Audi Q2 is a premium alternative to small SUVs like the Nissan Juke and Peugeot 2008. It costs a little more than its mainstream competitors, but offers a stylish exterior design, classy and functional interior, and a broad range of engines and drivetrain options. It’s not the most practical or affordable though.” Read review
Honest John
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “If you don’t mind spending a pretty penny then the Audi Q2 is a more upmarket and desirable alternative to smaller crossover options like the Nissan Juke or Peugeot 2008.” Read review
Model reviewed: 1.0-litre petrol manual “There are surprisingly few alternatives of this size that can compete with the pull of the Audi brand – apart from perhaps the Mini Countryman.” Read review
Motoring Research
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “Apply an image-friendly badge to a popular body style and what do you get? The Audi Q2. Leaving aside the A1 Citycarver, this is Audi’s smallest SUV.” Read review
Motors
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7 / 10 “Unsurprisingly, given the popularity of both the Audi badge and the small crossover sector, the Q2 has been a huge hit from the outset, with some models requiring quite a long order lead time due to demand.” Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8.4 / 10 “Smallest Audi crossover delivers chunky styling and a fine drive.” Read review
The Sun
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 “It’s quite clear the engine is the star of the show here. It’s the same 2.0-litre turbo we all know and love from the Golf R and Audi S3 – both sublimely good hot hatches.” Read review
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol manual “Cool, small and affordable. Audi’s future king?” Read review
The Sunday Times
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 “I cannot think of a single soul who would be interested in such a car.” (Jeremy Clarkson) Read review
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol automatic Sport Score: 8 / 10 “The petrol-powered 1.4 would be our pick of the range. If you buy the petrol-powered model, ‘quality product’ just about sums up the Audi Q2. It might be aimed at the selfie-generation but there’s nothing shallow about Audi’s smallest Q car.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 Score: 8 / 10 “Smart, slick and charming, this compact performance crossover inherits the mantle of rapid hatches of yesteryear” Read review
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic 190hp S Line Score: 8 / 10 “It is a mark of just how accomplished Audi’s small SUV is that despite not being the best Q2, when all things are considered, this 2.0 TFSI is still a highly desirable car.” Read review
Top Gear
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic SQ2 Score: 6 / 10 “Audi serves up a confident, capable hot crossover. Just forgets to add spice.” Read review
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 6 / 10 “The Audi Q2 is pleasingly bold on the surface, but plays with a very safe bat beneath it.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
The Audi Q2 was originally crash tested by Euro NCAP back in 2016 and awarded a five-star rating. However, this rating expired in January 2023 and is no longer valid as the car no longer meets the standards required for such a rating. This is normal practice, as Euro NCAP reviews its ratings on most cars annually with most ratings expiring after about six or seven years.
However, if you are comparing a used Q2 to vehicles of similar age, whose ratings will have probably also expired, its safety rating score is still useful.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
As of February 2026, the Audi Q2 has not yet been assessed by Green NCAP. If the Q2 is put through the Green NCAP lab testing programme, we will publish the results here.
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
No reliability rating
As of February 2026, we don’t have enough reliability data on the Audi Q2 to generate a reliability rating.
The Car Expert’s reliability information is provided exclusively to us using extended warranty data from our partner, MotorEasy. As soon as MotorEasy has sufficient data on the Q2, we’ll publish the score here.
Running cost rating
Monthly cost of ownership data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by Clear Vehicle Data
Fuel consumption
Average
Score
Petrol models
45 mpg
C
Diesel models
52 mpg
B
CO₂ output
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Petrol models
145 g/km
C
Diesel models
144 g/km
C
Insurance group
Average
Score
Variation
Score
All models
21
B
Service and maintenance
Cost
Score
Year 1
£210
B
Year 2
£576
C
Year 3
£944
C
Year 4
£1,218
C
Year 5
£1,624
C
Overall
£4,572
C
The Audi Q2 is average when it comes to ownership and running costs, according to data supplied by our technical partner Clear Vehicle Data.
Petrol versions offer around 45 mpg, which is around the market average, and diesel models are the more economical choice. The SUV’s insurance premiums are pretty cheap when compared to rivals, and the car is predicted to be rather cheap to service and maintain over five years of ownership.
Date: August 2023 Recall number: R/2023/254 Model types: All Build dates: 10/2020 to 05/2023 Number of vehicles affected: 104,162 Defect: On affected vehicles an electrical connector for the power supply for the fuse carrier in the interior of the vehicle may have not been installed correctly. Remedy: Check the electrical connection and secure if necessary.
Date: July 2019 Recall number: R/2019/234 Model types: All Build dates: 02/2019 Number of vehicles affected: 1 Defect: The mounting for the head restraint may not be correctly welded to the outer backrest frame for the rear seat. Remedy: The backrest on the rear seat bench must be checked and if necessary replaced.
Date: November 2018 Recall number: R/2018/338 Model types: All Build dates: 05/2018 to 09/2018 Number of vehicles affected: 147 Defect: The rear back rest head restraint mounting is not correctly welded. Remedy: Check and replace rear back rest frame if required.
Date: October 2018 Recall number: R/2018/295 Model types: All Build dates: 01/2017 to 06/2018 Number of vehicles affected: 3,650 Defect: The electro-mechanical park brake may be released inappropriately. Remedy: The software for the brake control will be updated.
Date: November 2017 Recall number: R/2017/311 Model types: All Build dates: 08/2017 Number of vehicles affected: 30 Defect: The hardening process for the rear wheel bearing housings may not have been correctly performed. In the worst case this could lead to a fractured housing. Should a fractured housing occur there would be abnormal noises bad tyre wear and a theoretical possibility of wheel loss. Remedy: Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and replace the right and left rear wheel bearing housings.
As of September 2024 (our most recent data point), there have been five DVSA vehicle safety recalls on the Audi Q2 addressing various different issues.
Not all vehicles are affected by recalls. You can check to see if your car is included in any of the above recalls by visiting the DVLA website or contacting your local Audi dealer.
If your car is affected by a recall, the vehicle must be repaired and you should not be charged for any work required. If you are buying a used Q2, you should insist that any outstanding recall work is completed before you take delivery of the vehicle.
The average price of a litre of fuel went up in June, ending three months of price drops as lockdown eased.
Petrol prices went up 3.74p per litre, from an average of 107.11p to 110.85p, while diesel was up 2.89p per litre, rising from 112.07p to 114.96p.
The data from RAC Fuel Watch shows the prices rise in correlation to lockdown measures easing and more cars being on the road, with increasing demand seeing the price of a barrel of oil rising more than $6 (£4.80) to $41.87 (£33.51).
The lockdown price drops were driven by supermarkets, with many selling petrol for as low as £1 per litre helping to bring the petrol average to a low of 106.48p on May 19. Diesel saw an average of 111.8p on the same date.
However, RAC Fuel Watch says the ‘big four’ supermarkets are also now driving increases, with Morrisons, in particular, bumping up the price of both fuels by about 7p per litre, followed closely by Asda.
RAC fuel spokesman Simon Williams said: “The pump price rises witnessed in June will have been a nasty shock to the system for drivers. While those who continued to drive regularly throughout the pandemic will have benefitted from some very low prices, millions won’t have so will be disappointed that just as they start to drive more again prices are on the up.
“It is, of course, the lack of demand for fuel which caused prices to drop in the first place so sadly it’s no great surprise that they’re on the rise again now.
“But drivers should take quite a lot of comfort from the fact that both petrol and diesel are a whopping 17p a litre cheaper than they were at the end of January. That means a tank of fuel is on average £9 less than it was then.
“And with RAC data predicting this weekend could be the busiest of the year so far on the roads that’s at least a little bit of better news, particularly as the direction of travel for fuel prices is upwards.
“Oil producer group OPEC and its allies are continuing to restrict output which has successfully driven up the barrel price and that can only mean one thing for drivers in the coming weeks – higher prices.
“This is confirmed by RAC Fuel Watch data which shows that petrol is likely to go up by 2p a litre in the next fortnight. Diesel, however, shouldn’t rise much at all unless retailers use the saving in its slightly lower wholesale price to subsidise petrol.”
New car registrations in June showed a reasonable amount of recovery from the disastrous figures for April and May. According to figures published this morning by the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), overall new car registrations were down 35% compared to the same month last year, although there are plenty of caveates to those results.
Private new car sales led the way in June as consumers began returning to car showrooms, with sales down 19% compared to June 2019. In England, doors opened right from the start of the month – although the SMMT estimates that 20% of dealers remained closed – while in Wales the date to reopen was 22 June and Scottish dealers could only open on 29 June.
What is not clear is what percentage of these numbers were collections of vehicles ordered before lockdown, and how many were fresh sales once dealers re-opened. The industry is not expecting great things over coming months, with the SMMT setting out its case for government support ahead of an expected call for a new scrappage scheme.
Fleet and business registrations were far more subdued, down 45% and 53% respectively. This is not surprising, with many companies still closed or fighting to keep expenditure to an absolute minimum. Until employees start returning to their workplaces rather than operating from home, there is no great urgency to provide them with new company cars.
Diesel sales slumped to even lower levels in June at about 18% of the overall market (including mild-hybrid diesels), hurt even more by poor fleet registrations and a strong month for small cars, which are often not evan available with diesel options. This fall has come directly at the expense of of electrified vehicles, with hybrid/plug-in hybrid and full-electric cars taking a record 16.5% of all registrations in June.
Year-to-date picture shows scale of collapse
With the first half of the year now behind us, the scale of the hit that the car industry has taken is illustrated quite starkly. For the first six months of 2020, overall new car registrations are down by more than 48%, with fleet and business sales again performing worse than private sales.
Electrified cars have taken nearly 15% of all registrations so far this year, with full-electric cars showing the greatest growth. Petrol-powered cars have seen a slight loss in market share but still command 65% of the overall market. Diesel cars, unsurprisingly, have taken the biggest hit with sales down nearly two-thirds over the first half of this year compared to the same period last year.
Good month, bad month, ugly month
For most car manufacturers, June was another month of bad news. With the overall market down by nearly half, there wasn’t a great deal to cheer about – unless you happen to work for MG or SsangYong, that is. The two budget brands both had very strong months, with MG almost doubling its sales compared to June last year (and almost tripling its market share). SsangYong recorded a registration increase of 30% compared to June 2019, which also more than doubled its share of the total market.
The success of these two budget brands suggests that new car buyers are reining in their spending in the light of economic uncertainty, and harks back to a decade ago when then-budget brands Kia and Hyundai did similarly well in the wake of the banking crash of 2008. Incidentally, those calling for another government-sponsored scrappage scheme may do well to remember that budget brands did well last time it happened – at the direct expense of volume brands and UK-built cars…
It was also a good month for hybrid-focused brands Lexus (up 13%) and Toyota (up 3%) and not-exactly-a-budget-brand Bentley, which was up more than 8%.
On the other side of the ledger, it wasn’t a great re-opening for DS Automobiles, Honda, Hyundai, Mazda or Suzuki, all of whom saw registrations fall to a greater degree than the overall market. Some of that may be dependent on supply levels, so we’ll keep an eye on it in coming months.
Life was even worse for Smart, not looking too clever with a fall of 72% against a market down 48%. But taking the wooden spoon for June was Subaru, which saw an 82% fall for June and only registered 44 cars for the entire month. If that doesn’t improve in short order, we may be saying sayonara to Subaru in the UK altogether.
Corsa cleans up as small cars dominate sales
With a lot of economic uncertaintly about, and fleet registrations still very depressed, it’s probably not surprising that the new car market for June was dominated by small car sales. The new Vauxhall Corsa topped the table over the Ford Fiesta, with the nearly-departed Toyota Yaris in third place.
Tesla sold three times as many Model 3s in June as it did in May, but it still slipped from first to ninth place, just ahead of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which popped up in the top ten list for the first time in a while.
We’ll have are usual analysis of the top ten in coming days as usual.
Volvo has issued a recall of nearly 170,000 of its cars across the UK due to a securing cable that can suffer from wear over time and could result in reduced seatbelt function.
The recall applies to examples the following vehicles built from 2006 to 2018:
Volvo S60
Volvo S60 Cross Country
Volvo S80
Volvo V60
Volvo V60 Cross Country
Volvo V70
Volvo XC60
Volvo XC70
These models exclude cars in the firm’s current-generation cycle of vehicles. A total of 169,481 cars are affected.
In a statement, the Swedish manufacturer said that: “Investigations by Volvo Cars have identified that in very rare cases and under specific circumstances, a flexible steel cable connected to the front seat belts on certain Volvo models produced between 2006 and 2018 may under certain rare circumstances suffer from wear and fatigue over time.
“In extreme cases, damage to the cable, which is located in a rubber sleeve on the outside of the seats, could result in reduced seat belt restraint function.”
We do not compromise on safety, and always take full responsibility to ensure the highest quality and safety standards of our cars. We apologise for the inconvenience caused to our customers, and are grateful for their cooperation as we look to perform this precautionary action.
It also added that the issue is ‘extremely rare’ and that it ‘has had no reports either globally or in the UK of accidents or personal injuries connected to this issue.’
Volvo will contact owners of all affected cars to inform them of the issue and will be asking them to contact their closest Volvo dealer to book in their vehicle to have the issue corrected. If you are unsure whether your car is affected by this recall, contact your nearest Volvo dealer.
Drivers are being urged to get their cars MOT tested this summer to avoid the rush as thousands look to get their vehicles tested after making use of the six-month coronavirus extension.
The scheme, which draws to a close on August 1, was put into place to allow key workers to keep moving during the coronavirus pandemic without having to put their cars through the MOT test. Applied automatically, it granted a six-month extension to any vehicle with an MOT set to expire between March 30 and July 31.
However, a new survey by the RAC has found that nearly all of its network of approved garages are expecting demand to increase from October when the first cars that automatically qualified for the extension will require testing.
By October, 70% of these members anticipate significantly more demand, which could result in drivers finding it difficult to book their cars in for an MOT.
Despite the extension being automatically applied, drivers do not have to follow it, as cars can still be MOT tested as normal.
Adam O’Neill, RAC head of motoring services, said: “In many ways this is an ideal time for people to get their cars booked in for an MOT – whether they’ve already taken advantage of the automatic extension or not. Our garages have yet to see demand return to pre-lockdown levels, but if drivers wait until the autumn they’ll be trying to arrange MOTs at the same time as hundreds of thousands of others.
“Understandably, demand for MOTs and servicing fell sharply after the coronavirus lockdown as garages closed and the government instructed all of us to stay at home. But as the lockdown has started to be eased, drivers may be left wondering whether now is the right time to be getting their cars checked over, or whether making use of the MOT extension is the best course of action.
“The message from us is simple – our garages are fully open and all are operating to our Covid-19 Code of Conduct to help keep customers and staff safe. And with 70% of garages offering a collect-and-return service, reducing interaction with garage staff, drivers needn’t be put off from getting MOTs, servicing or other maintenance work completed.”
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has outlined further proposals to extend the support on offer for car finance customers struggling to make their monthly payments as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, with lenders given only a few days to provide feedback before the measures are implemented.
The new proposals follow on from guidance issued in April for lenders to offer customers a three-month payment deferral (aka payment holiday) or other support if they had been affected by Covid-19 and the widespread lockdown across the UK. More than 600,000 car finance customers applied for support from lenders in the first month, with about 90% of those being granted.
The latest measures are aimed at both customers who have already taken a three-month payment deferral, as well as those who have yet to take up any form of payment support.
The new FCA guidance places the onus on lenders to contact customers before the end of their payment freeze and see if they are able to resume making payments. If so, they should agree a plan on how the missed payments (plus any interest) should be repaid.
If a customer tells the finance company that they are not able to resume payments, the lender should offer either a further three-month payment deferral or reduced payments for three months at a level the customer can afford. Alternatively, the lender is encouraged to offer any other means of support, such as waiving interest, to assist customers.
The FCA has also reiterated that any additional payment freezes or partial payment freezes offered under this latest guidance should not have a negative impact on a customer’s credit files. It has also extended the ban on repossessions until the end of October.
If a customer has not yet availed themselves of a payment freeze under the original FCA guidance, the period to do so has been extended to 31 October.
Christopher Woolard, Interim Chief Executive at the FCA, said: “It is vital that people facing temporary payment difficulties because of the impact of coronavirus get the assistance they need.
“For those who have already taken a payment freeze and can afford to start making payments, even partially, it is in their best interest to do so, but for those that need help it will be there.”
The industry has welcomed the latest proposals from the FCA, in particular the more nuanced approach that replaces the original blanket approach presented in April. Adrian Dally, head of motor finance at the Finance and Leasing Association (FLA), which represents the lenders, said: “The breadth of today’s guidance from the FCA recognises the variety of different situations that customers will be in at this point.
“With more parts of the economy reopening, many customers will be returning to work and will be able to resume full payments. For those returning to part time work, partial payments are an option.
“Customers who still need ongoing help will, of course, be supported. Motor finance lenders have been providing unprecedented levels of forbearance to customers since the start of the crisis, but it is now time for the Government to support the industry so that it is able to continue to offer finance to consumers and businesses at affordable rates during the recovery.”
The FLA has reported to The Car Expert that, for the 12 weeks up until the end of May, about 613,000 car finance customers had made a request for Covid-19-related support (data for June should be available soon). Of these requests, about 90% had been granted. Specific details about how many of these were for the full three months of payment holiday are not provided, but the very high percentage of approvals suggests that the lenders have been supportive to date.
Although the economic situation has certainly not improved since the FCA published its initial directives on coronavirus support measures in late April, the general sense of panic has subsided as everyone has started coming to terms with our new reality.
Back in April, the headline message from the FCA was that lenders should offer a three-month payment deferral to any customer who requested it, with a minor mention buried in a lengthy document that other support measures should be offered instead if they were more suitable. This time around, the regulator has been more forward about suggesting alternative options and promoting a more tailored approach to each customer.
A blanket three-month payment holiday offer was probably necessary in the first instance, as there was a pressing need to provide stability for the millions of car finance customers across the UK and prevent widespread defaulting. While the car industry and associated lenders were prepared to accept that directive at the time, there was a quiet insistence that it was only suitable as a one-off measure and that the industry couldn’t afford to repeat it.
One particularly welcome point within today’s FCA draft guidance was an expectation for lenders to contact customers who have taken a payment holiday to see if they can resume payments, rather than sitting back and waiting for customers to call up and beg for support. We received many complaints from readers who found it impossible to get hold of their finance companies to even discuss their situation, or lenders who refused to offer any kind of support until the FCA stepped in to issue clear directives (Volkwagen Finance, we’re looking at you).
Another point buried in the FCA’s 14-page document is that lenders must adequately explain the consequences of a further payment deferral. Car finance agreements will still accrue interest at the same rate, meaning that – unless you’re on a 0% APR agreement – every month that you don’t make a full payment will cost you more down the line. Lenders are also required to explain the consequences of extending the end date of finance agreements, and the implications for MOTs/servicing/warranties/insurance/breakdown cover.
It’s essentially a rebadged and lightly restyled version of the Toyota RAV4 plug-in hybrid, and the first product from a joint venture between Suzuki and Toyota to develop electrified vehicles. The Across is expected to go on sale this autumn.
There are some distinguishing features between the Across and RAV4, with new front and rear bumpers, as well as redesigned LED headlights and 19-inch alloy wheels helping to separate the two.
The cabin benefits from a multifunction steering wheel, while the cabin is centred around a nine-inch touchscreen infotainment system which houses media functions and satellite navigation. Both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are fitted too.
Underneath the bonnet sits a 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine which is linked to a 18kWh battery pack and an electric motor fitted to each axle. Suzuki says that the total system output is 180hp and 270Nm of torque, while the Across will be able to travel up to 47 miles on solely electric power. At this stage, there is no news about a non-plug-in hybrid version being offered.
Suzuki has been keen to fit some level of off-road ability too, which is why the Across features a Trail setting – this can send power to the wheels with the most grip enabling it to tackle difficult terrains and conditions easily.
Distinct driver settings allow whoever is behind the wheel to tailor the car’s setup to specific settings and allow the car to run in either hybrid or fully electric modes. A ‘hold’ function has also been incorporated in order to save charge for later in the journey, such as when travelling through a city or urban area.
Prices for the Across are yet to be announced, but they’re likely to be in the same region as the RAV4’s £33,450 entry price.
The Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio is the high-performance version of the regular Giulia saloon, launched in 2016 with a Ferrari-developed 2.9-litre twin-turbo V6 petrol engine producing around 500hp.
It was developed to compete with established high-performance German sports saloons and remains closely related to the Stelvio Quadrifoglio SUV.
UK media reviews have been consistently enthusiastic about the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio, praising its sharp steering, balance and engine response. It is widely regarded as one of the most engaging performance saloons of its generation.
However, ownership considerations are less favourable. Running costs are very high, particularly for fuel, insurance and maintenance. Reliability data in recent years has been weak, and warranty cover is only average. As one of the oldest new car designs still on sale in the UK, its Euro NCAP safety rating has now expired and its dashboard technology no longer matches the newest rivals.
As of February 2026, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio holds a New Car Expert Rating of E, with a score of 51%. While media review scores remain very strong, high running costs, high CO2 emissions, an expired safety rating and poor reliability data significantly reduce its overall ownership score.
Body style: Mid-sized saloon Engines: 2.9-litre petrol Price: From £86,885 on-road
Launched: Summer 2016 Last updated: Summer 2023 Replacement due: TBA
Image gallery
Media reviews
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
Featured reviews
“It was designed to take on the BMW M3, but stole our hearts along the way – the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio remains a masterpiece in its latest form.”
“The Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio is a proper BMW M3-beater – it’s fantastic to drive. The sluggish infotainment might drive you up the wall, though.”
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “Minor tweaks mean the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio is still a strong competitor in the performance-car market.” Author: Alex Ingram Read review
Model reviewed: 2023 facelift model Score: 9 / 10 “The updated Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio is better than ever, with a unique appeal and serious performance.” (Jordan Katsianis) Read review
Score: 10 / 10 “Several years after its launch, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio remains one of the most thrilling super saloons on sale today. The driving experience is just as exhilarating as before, but minor tweaks for 2020 have improved the Gulia as an everyday package. The revised infotainment still isn’t perfect, but it’s an easy flaw to forgive. The next BMW M3 will have to be good to beat it.” Read review
Score: 9 / 10 “Alfa Romeo super saloon is a convincing rival to the Mercedes-AMG and BMW M establishment.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: Score: 8 / 10 “It’s not getting any younger, but the Giulia Quadrifoglio is still an incredibly desirable performance saloon with the kind of delicate handling characteristics that its heavier German rivals struggle to match.” (James Dennison) Read review
Car Keys
Score: 9 / 10 “In terms of performance saloon cars, we can’t think of many more appealing prospects than the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio.” Read review
Carbuyer
Score: 8 / 10 “The Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio is a thrilling super saloon that seems perfectly set up for UK roads” Author: Charlie Harvey, Alex Ingram Read review
Company Car Today
“While the regular Giulia can genuinely compete with the best premium saloons in its sector, this monster of a car shows that Alfa can still offer glamour, performance and desirability at the top end of the segment.” Read review
Daily Mail
Score: 10 / 10 “There is no other car in the world today with such understated sophistication, good looks and exhilarating performance. If this really is the make-or-break car Alfa has pinned its future on, then stand easy, everyone – mission accomplished.” (Chris Evans) Read review
The Sun
“It’s a rear-wheel drive Alfa/Ferrari. It’s everything you want it to be. Clarkson’s favourite. Top Gear mag’s Car of the Year. The safest car ever tested by Euro NCAP. And it comes with three years’ unlimited warranty, free servicing and roadside assistance. Alfa has got it so right.” Read review
The Sunday Times
Score: 8 / 10 “What I’m saying here, in this straight, no-cocking-about road test, is that Alfa Romeo has made a car dynamically better than the BMW M3. And it has. It really has. This is Iceland beating England. And I couldn’t be more pleased.” (Jeremy Clarkson) Read review
Score: 8 / 10 “The Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio is the best four-door supersaloon on the market. Its Ferrari-derived V6 engine makes one of the finest noises of any car, and its handling characteristics make it an addictive plaything.” Read review
Top Gear
“The Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio is one of the best cars I’ve driven. Its chassis and ride offer an incredible bipolar personality that sees it morph out of comfortable fuel-sipper to track nutter with a twist of a knob.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
The Alfa Romeo Giulia was originally tested by Euro NCAP back in 2016 and awarded a five-star rating. However, this rating expired in January 2023 and is no longer valid as the car no longer meets the standards required for such a rating. This is normal practice, as Euro NCAP reviews its ratings on most cars annually with most ratings expiring after about six or seven years.
However, if you are comparing a used Giulia Quadrifoglio to vehicles of similar age, whose ratings may also have expired, its safety rating score is still useful.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
As of February 2026, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio has not been assessed by Green NCAP.
If the Giulia Quadrifoglio is put through the Green NCAP lab testing programme, we will publish the results here. However, don’t be expecting an outstanding set of results from a 500hp petrol V6-powered sports saloon…
Running cost rating
Monthly cost of ownership data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by Clear Vehicle Data
Fuel consumption
Average
Score
Petrol models
28 mpg
E
CO₂ output
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Petrol models
229 g/km
E
Insurance group
Average
Score
Variation
Score
All models
48
E
Service and maintenance
Cost
Score
Year 1
£544
E
Year 2
£1,307
E
Year 3
£2,070
E
Year 4
£2,353
E
Year 5
£3,174
E
Overall
£9,448
E
As you might expect, the high-performance Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio is an expensive car to run on the daily commute, according to data exclusively provided by our technical partner, Clear Vehicle Data.
Fuel consumption for the twin-turbo V6 engine is inevitably poor, which is closely related to the CO2 score. The Giulia’s huge performance also means it earns a very high insurance group rating, so you’ll pay quite a lot for your annual car insurance premium.
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
Total claims: 69 Average repair cost: £1388.45 Last updated: April 2025
As of April 2025 (our most recent data point), the Alfa Romeo Giulia family holds a very poor reliability score of just 11%, according to data provided exclusively to The Car Expert by our commercial partner, MotorEasy.
Several of the repair bills have also been hugely expensive, such as an average gearbox repair cost of more than £8,000. Electrical system repairs are also far more expensive than you’d expect to see, with an average repair bill of almost £3,000. Fortunately, both of these problem types have been relatively rare to date.
In owners’ surveys conducted by some magazines, the Giulia has scored very well. However, these are not based on verified objective workshop data like the information we have above.
If you own an Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio, or are looking buy a second-hand model, you should definitely think about purchasing a used car warranty that covers these problem areas.
Warranty rating
New car warranty information for the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
Overall rating
C
51%
New car warranty duration
5 years
New car warranty mileage
75,000 miles
Battery warranty duration
0 years
Battery warranty mileage
0 miles
Alfa Romeo’s new car warranty is better than average, and better than most premium brands in a similar price bracket as the Giulia Quadrifoglio.
The duration is five years, with a limit of 75,000 miles.
Warranty on a used Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
If you are buying an ‘Alfa Romeo Certified’ Giulia Quadrifoglio from an official Alfa Romeo dealership, you will get a minimum 12-month warranty included.
If you are buying a used Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio from an independent dealership, any warranty offered will vary and will probably be managed by a third-party warranty company.
If you are buying a used Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio from a private seller, there are no warranty protections beyond any remaining portion of the original new car warranty.
If you’re looking to buy any used car that is approaching the end of its warranty period, a used car warranty is usually a worthwhile investment. Check out The Car Expert’s guide to the best used car warranty providers, which will probably be cheaper than a warranty sold by a dealer.
Recalls
Official DVSA safety recalls that have been issued for the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
Date: July 2023 Model types: Giulia Quadrifoglio Build dates: 12/2015 to 11/2020 Number of vehicles affected: 100 Defect: Affected vehicles equipped with the option BRM (carbon ceramic matrix brakes) may face a braking management issue due to unexpected control unit signals. This may lead to a carbon ceramic disc rupture with a resultant risk of loss or degradation of braking performance. Remedy: Re-program the BSM (braking system module) with updated software.
Date: September 2022 Model types: All Build dates: 11/2020 to 05/2022 Number of vehicles affected: 973 Defect: The automatic headlight position sensors may not have been calibrated and therefore the function does not comply with the requirements of ECE R48. Remedy: Recalibration of the automatic headlight position sensors and alignment of the headlights.
Date: January 2022 Model types: All Build dates: 09/2020 to 06/2021 Number of vehicles affected: 157 Defect: Due to a production nonconformity there may be the possibility of a fuel leak from the fuel pressure and temperature sensor. Remedy: Replace the front fuel supply pipe and sensor.
Date: September 2021 Model types: All Build dates: 06/2021 Number of vehicles affected: 37 Defect: The vehicle may not comply with ECE Regulation 16 Amendment 07 where all seats must be equipped with a safety belt reminder function with visual and audible indication of seat belt status. Remedy: Conduct a software update to ensure the seat belt indication is available for all occupied seats.
Date: March 2021 Model types: Giulia Quadrifoglio Build dates: 03/2020 to 08/2020 Number of vehicles affected: 7 Defect: There is a possibility of the rear brake discs having micro-cracks. Remedy: Replace the rear brake discs.
Date: January 2020 Model types: All Build dates: 11/2018 to 09/2019 Number of vehicles affected: 57 Defect: The seats may not lock in the correct position. Remedy: Check and replace the seat frame if necessary.
Date: December 2019 Model types: All Build dates: 12/2017 to 09/2019 Number of vehicles affected: 116 Defect: Fuel leakages may occur and fumes may form inside the passenger compartment. Remedy: Fit a new plug and seal to the fuel fitter assembly.
Date: September 2019 Model types: All Build dates: 03/2016 to 08/2019 Number of vehicles affected: 2,402 Defect: More fuel than actually present in the tank could be displayed on the instrument panel. Remedy: Update the software of the control module which governs fuel level management.
Date: July 2019 Model types: All Build dates: 03/2016 to 06/2019 Number of vehicles affected: 493 Defect: Undesired acceleration of the vehicle may occur whilst active cruise control is operational. Remedy: Update the software in the brake system module.
Date: March 2018 Model types: All Build dates: 11/2017 to 12/2017 Number of vehicles affected: 11 Defect: The brake/clutch system components may be damaged and system performance may decay as a result of the potential presence of mineral oil in the brake-clutch fluid because the components are not compatible with mineral oil. As a result brake/clutch system performance may deteriorate. Remedy: Replace the components in the brake-clutch system.
As of September 2024 (our most recent data point), there have been eight DVSA vehicle safety recalls on the overall Alfa Romeo Giulia range, with another two that are specific to the Giulia Quadrifoglio. These cover headlights, fuel system, seats, software and brake issues.
Not all vehicles are affected by recalls. You can check to see if your car is included in any of the above recalls by visiting the DVLA website or contacting your local Alfa Romeo dealer.
If your car is affected by a recall, the vehicle must be repaired and you should not be charged for any work required. If you are buying a used Giulia, you should insist that any outstanding recall work is completed before you take delivery of the vehicle.
Awards
Trophies, prizes and awards that the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio has received
Bentley has revealed its updated Bentayga, which has been given a styling makeover to match the rest of the brand’s models, as well as receiving several technological upgrades.
The Bentayga was the first SUV for the luxury market when it was launched and has enjoyed dominant success as a result. Bentley says it has shifted 20,000 units since it was introduced in 2016 – more than any other Bentley over a four-year period.
However, with rivals joining the segment, the British firm has given the SUV an overhaul. While it’s still recognisable as a Bentayga, the new model gets the slim crystal-cut glass headlights seen on the Continental GT and Flying Spur. It’s also a centimetre wider on each side and the bonnet is 3cm higher to give the car “more presence”.
At the back, the taillights have also taken the same elliptical shape as the Continental models, and are now integrated into a wraparound bootlid. It’s the same size as before, but the new styling gives the impression of more width, according to design director Stefan Sielaff.
Interior comfort was another focus area, with a new centre console, seats and dashboard. Rear seat passengers can now have cooled seats as well as heated, and there’s a new tablet to give them control over in-car functions such as the entertainment.
Up front, there’s a new 11-inch touchscreen infotainment system that has updated software to make it faster and more responsive, including Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Every Bentayga also has an embedded SIM card to give owners immediate access to connected services.
Other interior improvements include USB-C data ports and wireless phone charging as standard, while optional upgrades include a brushed aluminium trim, two new wood veneers and new quilted upholstery.
The Bentayga will be launched with the 550hp V8 petrol engine, and will be joined shortly after by the plug-in hybrid version in Europe and the UK. A W12 ‘Speed’ variant will join later and is expected to go to America first, where there is the most appetite for large-engined performance vehicles.
Bentley suggested pricing would be about 5% more than the current Bentayga when it goes on sale next week, so expect a starting price of approximately £140,000.
Slightly less ugly, should still be popular
Probably like many of its customers, the Bentley Bentayga is getting a mid-life facelift. A few nips and tucks are aimed at keeping it looking young against a growing field of competitors.
Designers have tried to make its butt look bigger, Kardashian-style. The front end has been made a bit wider and taller – the automotive equivalent of a boob job. The good news is that updated Bentayga looks slightly less ugly than the original model, although that never seemed to hurt sales among its target demographic.
