The latest sixth-generation Mercedes-Benz C-Class has gone on sale in the UK, with all of its four-strong engine range now in mild-hybrid form.
The 48-volt Integrated Starter Generator (ISG) mild hybrid system recovers energy and offers engine-off coasting to improve efficiency and emissions.
It also makes each engine more powerful, by 20hp and 200Nm and is combined with a standard-fit nine-speed auto transmission.
Entry to the new range is the C 200 in saloon and estate varieties starting at £38,785 and £40,420 respectively.
Both versions employ a 1.5-litre petrol engine of 204hp and 300Nm, with official fuel economy figures of 41 to 44mpg depending on specification (and 40 to 42mpg in the estate). CO2 figures are 146-154g/km (151 to 159 in the estate).
The C 300 is only available in saloon form from £43,500. Its 2.0-litre petrol engine produces 258hp and 400Nm. Fuel economy ranges between 40 and 42mpg, emissions between 152 and 159g/km.
Until now the best-selling variant, the diesel-powered C 220 d’s 2.0-litre engine puts out 200hp and 440Nm. Fuel economy ranges from 59 to 61mpg (56 to 60mpg in the estate) and emissions from 120-127g/m (124-131). Prices are from £40,785 for the saloon, £42,085 for the estate.
Range-topper is another diesel, the C 300 d at prices starting from £45,925 for the saloon and £47,225 for the estate. It has a 3.0-litre engine of 265hp and 550Nm, fuel economy of 53 to 55mpg (estate, 52-54) and emissions of 133-139g/km (136-143).
The new C-Class is yet to be crash-tested by Euro NCAP but a wide range of active safety measures are offered as standard across all four trim levels and Mercedes-Benz will be expecting a five-star safety rating.
However a suite of driver-assistance technology including the latest developments in distance, steering, traffic sign, lane-keeping, evasive steering, braking, emergency stop and blind spot assistance, is only available at a £1,695 option, and this only on top Premium Plus models.
Volkswagen is joining the current fad for coupé-styled SUVs with the Taigo, expected on UK roads early in 2022.
Already on sale for a year in South America, the Taigo is closely related to the T-Cross SUV and Polo supermini. It’s expected to take on the mass-selling Nissan Juke, which is almost the same size as the Volkswagen newcomer.
The Taigo follows the current coupé-SUV fashion with a sharply sloping rear body, which Volkswagen insists does not restrict rear-seat headroom. It offers a 438-litre boot capacity, which is comparable to its less aggressively styled sister the T-Cross.
While Volkswagen is yet to confirm full details of Taigo powertrains, it is expected to be totally petrol-powered, and with only front-wheel-drive variants on offer.
Initial cars on sale are set to offer engines with 95, 110 or 250hp power outputs. Five- and six-speed manual transmissionss, as well as a seven-speed automatic, are offered depending on engine choice.
Initially, at least, the new model will only be offered in higher-specification Style and R-Line trim levels. Standard equipment will include an all-digital cockpit and what Volkswagen describes as “latest-generation assistance systems guaranteeing optimum comfort and a high level of safety for all passengers.”
Every Taigo will include Front Assist with an emergency braking function, and the lane departure warning system Lane Assist as standard. Offered as an option and taken from VW’s electric car range will be ‘IQ.DRIVE Travel Assist’, which will allow semi-automated driving at up to 130mph.
Standard equipment will also include the latest version of VW’s entertainment systems. These are fitted with an online control unit and depending on the configuration will offer features such as access to streaming services, voice control and cloud-based personalisation.
Volkswagen has not yet revealed prices for the Taigo but they are expected to be more expensive than the T-Cross. Industry sources predict starting prices at around £25,000.
We have written extensively at The Car Expert about the benefits of buying a good used car warranty once you have found yourself a new, second-hand, vehicle.
These warranties – or mechanical breakdown insurance – are designed to protect you from the cost of your pride and joy suffering an unforeseen failure. Levels of cover can vary from policy to policy, but a quick check of the small print and you’ll soon discover what your intended policy covers. At the very least, it should be the most important mechanical parts.
Being covered by a used car warranty means you won’t be left alone to deal with the mess of a part failure or breakdown. And most policies don’t just take care of the cost of replacement parts – they can also cover labour and (depending on your level of cover) important extras such as car hire.
So, many motorists, particularly those who drive long distances, rely on their car heavily, or have spent good, hard-earned money on their new wheels, a warranty can prove a smart investment.
But only if you receive what you think you’re going to get, if (or perhaps when…) the time comes for your car to let you down.
That’s why it’s important to consider buying a fully insured warranty, not least because you can then be assured the company you’re dealing with is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
For a start, an insured and regulated warranty provider must report to the FCA twice a year. This must include solvency to meet regulatory requirements for insurance firms and groups, covering financial resources, governance and accountability, risk assessment and management, supervision, reporting and public disclosure.
Additionally, a regulated warranty provider will pay a levy to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), which can pay compensation if the firm you’ve used has gone out of business and can’t pay your claim. It’s funded by the financial industry – banks, building societies, insurance companies and pension schemes – and providers of insured warranties will pay thousands of pounds into the FSCS coffers every year to enable it to operate.
And as a third safety net, buying an insured warranty means that if you are unhappy about the service you’ve received, or the policy terms or claim settlement, you can go to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) for a binding decision. Whatever ruling the FOS makes, your insured warranty provider will have to obey. An unregulated provider does not have to do this.
It’s quite easy to spot an uninsured plan, if you know what to look for. They may be advertised as a ‘warranty’, but check the small print and you’ll see they are ‘discretionary’ schemes and firms will use that word frequently: “the amount of compensation made is at the discretion of the scheme administrator…”. In some cases, this can mean no pay-out at all.
And although they have to adhere to basic standards and codes of practice, these providers are not monitored in terms of the FCA mandatory regulations and so don’t have to answer to, or abide by, the regulated bodies and their rulings. In other words, they can offer a range of products, but they are not obliged to pay when a claim comes in.
An industry source confirmed that sellers of uninsured plans are free to advertise cover that ultimately they don’t have to pay out for.
So, like any insurance cover, you may or may not need to claim on it, but, after you have spent decent cash on your new car and bothered to find a warranty policy to cover it, how much of a risk you are prepared to take on the chances of getting the compensation you need if something goes wrong, is something worth giving some serious thought to.
Here at The Car Expert, we have some fantastic warranty offers for our readers provided by our commercial partners. If you’re interested in a used car warranty, you should check these out:
ALA Insurance provides used car warranties in conjunction with the RAC
MotorEasy offers warranties and many other types of cover for car owners
The Subaru Levorg was launched in 2015 as a replacement for the Japanese brand’s Legacy all-wheel-drive estate car, which enjoyed a small but loyal audience amongst mainly rural-based buyers.
Unfortunately for Subaru, the Levorg – the name created by combining ‘Legacy’, ‘Revolution’ and ‘Touring’ (“a bizarre combination” says Auto Express) struggled to find an audience in the UK and remains a rarity on the roads. Parkers called it “an oddity, difficult to pigeonhole,” and Car “maybe the oddest car you can currently buy” while Honest John said it has “a curious specification.”
This is because you could only buy the Levorg in one form. Initially, it was with a 1.6-litre flat-four turbo petrol engine, but in 2019 this was changed for a 2.0-litre non-turbo unit with slightly less power and torque. Regardless of engine, the drive is put to the road through a CVT automtic gearbox. “It certainly feels lethargic on the road – low-speed pickup is far from generous and if you let the CVT rev the engine hard, it’s thrashy and there’s little in the way of serious thrust,” Car commented.
The 2019 update also saw very subtle exterior styling changes and improvements to the interior trim and equipment – the breadth of specification does earn a plus point, with a seven-inch touchscreen sat nav, Android Auto and Apple CarPlay integration and a wide range of active safety.
Many reviewers saw the Levorg as appealing to a niche market of rural drivers who need something that will work in all weathers and all surfaces. In these situations it copes well and is generally well-built – Honest John commented on the interior space and while saying that the functional dash layout “lacks a feelgood factor,” highlighted the build quality; “everything feels like it will last for years.”
No longer on sale in the UK, the Subaru Levorg holds an Used CarExpert Rating of D with a score of 58%. That’s well off the pace of similar cars like the BMW 3 Series Touring, Skoda Octavia estate or Audi A4 Avant.
This first-generation Levorg has been replaced by a second-generation range, but this latest iteration is only on sale in Japan, Australia and New Zealand. There has been no indication of if or when that model will come to the UK.
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
Auto Express
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 6 / 10 “The Subaru Levorg estate is an unusual, practical choice that lacks a little sophistication compared to its rivals.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: Score: 6 / 10 “A weak powertrain is the Rolls Royce Wraith’s biggest drawback, especially when the chassis is so well sorted. But use it as intended – a functional, durable, low-stress estate car – and it will be just that – a useful, reliable car.” Read review
Car Keys
Model reviewed: Score: 6 / 10 “The Subaru Levorg is a small and sporty estate car, with four-wheel drive and an automatic gearbox as standard. It’s fun to drive, but it isn’t as cheap to run as rivals like the SEAT Leon ST.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 6.8 / 10 “The Subaru Levorg is handsome, practical and refined, but its high purchase price and significant running costs mean it’ll be a niche choice at best.” Read review
Carwow
Model reviewed: Score: 5 / 10 “The Subaru Levorg offers grippy all-wheel-drive and lots of equipment for a sensible price. Its alternatives have more engine choice, more space and more quality, however.” Read review
Evo
Model reviewed: Score: 7 / 10 “With permanent 4WD and a turbocharged boxer engine, the Levorg sounds promising. But its CVT gearbox makes it hard to access its potential.” Read review
Heycar
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 4 / 10 “The Levorg didn’t impress a great deal when it was launched in 2015, and Subaru’s changes in 2019 have actually made it worse. We’d avoid it and buy a Subaru Outback, or anything else, instead.” Read review
Honest John
Model reviewed: Score: 6 / 10 “The Rolls Royce Wraith offers excellent handling and impressive comfort.” Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Score: 7 / 10 “The Subaru Levorg Sport Tourer is a no-nonsense estate that handles well, feels nicely made, and is a pleasant place in which to spend time.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: “The Subaru Levorg is a reassuring place to be.” Read review
Top Gear
Model reviewed: 1.6-litre petrol automatic “Subaru does the simple, driver-pleasing stuff very well, and those who ‘get’ the Levorg (around 500 a year, Subaru hopes) will likely be deeply satisfied, especially when they take some unsuspecting hot hatch scalps on a twisting B-road.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
The Subaru Levorg was tested by Euro NCAP in 2016 and gained a top-level five-star rating. Testers highlighted the performance of the autonomous emergency braking, that avoided impacts altogether in some tests and also recorded impressive results in a wide range of tests representing potential pedestrian impacts.
Eco rating
No eco rating
No longer on sale, the Subaru Levorg has not been lab tested by Green NCAP.
Reliability rating
As of March 2026, we don’t have enough reliability data on the Subaru Levorg to generate a reliability rating.
The Car Expert’s reliability information is provided exclusive from extended warranty data from our partner, MotorEasy. As soon as MotorEasy has sufficient data on the Levorg, we’ll publish the score here.
Similar cars
If you’re looking at the Subaru Levorg, you might also be interested in these alternatives
Adding to the weirdness surrounding the Levorg is that two potentially better rivals to it are produced by its own maker – the XV crossover and Outback all-wheel-drive estate. But its price also brings upmarket rivals such as the Audi A4 Avant and BMW 320xDrive Touring into the reckoning. More obvious rivals such as Skoda’s diesel-powered Octavia Scout are also considerably cheaper than the Subaru.
Buy a used Subaru Levorg
If you’re looking to buy a Subaru Levorg, The Car Expert’s partners can help you find the right car
You go through all the time, expense and drama of learning to drive, take a theory test and a practical examination and finally get your full licence. Then you throw it all away by losing it through disqualification less than two years later. Sounds unbelievable?
Not for nearly 8,000 people last year, it wasn’t.
Figures obtained by independent road safety charity group IAM Roadsmart has shown a worrying increase in the number of new drivers losing their licence within 24 months of passing their driving test.
The findings show that disqualifications have risen sharply among newly qualified drivers: 5,401 drivers lost their licences in 2018, increasing to 7,484 in 2019 and again to 7,975 last year.
Driving without insurance is one of the top reasons why new drivers are falling foul of the Road Traffic (New Drivers) Act. More than 12,000 have been caught driving without proper cover since 2018.
The New Drivers Act was introduced to give newly qualified motorists a probationary period of two years after passing their driving test. During this time, drivers will lose their licence if they commit offences leading to six or more points on their licence.
So two penalty charge notices (PCNs) for speeding would mean automatic disqualification. Once the newly qualified driver reaches six points they need to retake both their theory and practical driving tests again.
Speeding was the second highest reason for new drivers losing their licences, with more than 5,500 being convicted of this. Other reasons for the newly qualified to lose their licence within their probation period include not being control of the vehicle – often by using a mobile phone behind the wheel – and failing to provide information about who was driving a vehicle when an offence was committed.
“These figures paint a worrying picture,” says Neil Greig, IAM RoadSmart director of policy and research. “It is the responsibility of all drivers, whether they are newly qualified or more experienced behind the wheel, to drive safely and within the law at all times and to ensure the vehicle is roadworthy and insured for the purpose it is being used.
“Driver education is something that drivers should want to continue and develop as they gain experience behind the wheel. Post-test driver training such as an advanced course or driver training through employment allows the driver to continue to improve their confidence, skills and ability to drive safely on our roads.”
The growing electric crusade on the UK’s roads has received a boost after new research shows the number of motorists now considering an electric vehicle as their next purchase has risen by 32% in the last 12 months.
The new study, by automotive servicing and repair company Kwik Fit, reveals that 11% of drivers who are planning to change their car soon, expect its replacement to be fully electric. This compares with 8% of drivers a year ago.
When hybrid vehicles are included, the number of drivers anticipating opting for a low-emission model for their next vehicle rises to 37%, up from 33% over the last year.
In the past 12 months, hybrid or fully electric cars have overtaken petrol and diesel models as most drivers’ expected next vehicle. A year ago, Kwik Fit’s research showed that the 33% of drivers who expected their next car to be a low emission vehicle were outweighed by the 41% who said their next car would have a petrol or diesel engine.
This balance has now been reversed, with 37% now stating that their next vehicle would be low emissions, outstripping the 35% likely to opt for diesel or petrol. A quarter of drivers (28%) said they haven’t decided yet.
Regional divisions a challenge for policy makers
Of all the UK regions, drivers in London are the most likely to be considering switching to either a hybrid or fully electric car – 65% of drivers have said they are doing so. In Scotland, only 24% say they are opting for a low-emission engine in their next car.
The research indicates there is a challenge for policy makers looking to encourage drivers to switch to electric as soon as possible. The new research found that on average, drivers expect to change their vehicle in 21.6 months. Those expecting their next car to be electric plan to change their car in an average of 23.9 months, compared to 17.6 months for those opting for internal combustion models.
Although low-emission vehicles as a whole have overtaken diesel and petrol models as planned purchases, the number planning to go fully electric (11%) is still quite low, with several reasons given as potential hurdles.
The lack of fast charging points is the biggest factor, cited by 38% of drivers not yet considering swapping to fully electric. In the North East, South West, South East and Scotland, the increased cost over an equivalent petrol or diesel model is the greatest barrier. For drivers in the West Midlands and the East of England, their biggest concern is the perceived restrictions on range of electric cars.
“This research shows that over the last 12 months car buyers appear to have passed a tipping point in the switch to electric cars,” says Roger Griggs, communications director at Kwik Fit.
“However, although consideration of low emission models has overtaken that for petrol and diesel there is clearly still a lot to do to convince some drivers. Some barriers to consideration can be put down to misperception or a lack of up to date knowledge and the industry must work together to address those areas.
“But it is also vital that there is visible investment made in the charging infrastructure to ensure that drivers have the confidence to make the switch.”
Reasons drivers are not currently considering an electric car
Reason
% not considering
Lack of fast charging points in the areas I commonly drive
38
Increased cost over an equivalent petrol, diesel or hybrid car
36
Restrictions on range / Inability to travel long distance on a single charge
35
I would not be able to charge it at home
33
I am worried that the batteries won’t last very long and need replacing
26
I prefer traditional petrol or diesel engines
16
I want to know more people who have one before I commit
16
I don’t believe that they are more environmentally friendly than existing cars
12
I don’t like the style of electric cars available
8
There isn’t an electric car which provides the power I need
Renault has started taking orders for its Arkana, the first of its SUV range with liftback ‘coupé-inspired’ styling.
Based on the Renault Captur small SUV but stretched by 30cm, the Renault Arkana carries a sleeker profile than its more upright Captur and Kadjar SUV siblings. But its makers insist that the car is still practical, with generous rear seat space and a 513-litre boot.
Two powertrains are on offer, both electrified. The E-Tech hybrid 145 Auto combines a 1.6-litre petrol engine with two electric motors powered from a 1.2kWh lithium-ion battery pack.
Like most hybrid drivetrains, start-up and low-speed travel is done in electric mode, making the car particularly suitable for urban stop-start driving. Renault quotes fuel economy of about 59mpg and CO2 emissions of 108g/km, adding that the car will cover the 0-62mph sprint in just under 11 seconds.
A new design of automatic transmission promises seamless switching between electric and petrol power. The car offers three driving modes, the default ‘My Sense’, Eco and Sport.
Regenerative braking feeding power back into the battery is also part of the package and able to be increased in effectiveness by selecting a function on the dash.
The second version of the Renault Arkana uses a 1.3-litre petrol engine of 140hp, combined with a mild hybrid unit using the starter motor as a generator. This offers some reduction in emissions, but it can’t be driven under electric power alone so the petrol engine will always be driving the wheels.
Gear changes are through a dual-clutch auto unit and the 140hp also includes a ‘Sailing Stop’ function that allows the car to coast during declaration to add to the emissions reduction. It returns economy and emissions figures of 48.7mpg and 131g/km, and is faster accelerating than its sister with a 0-62mph time of just under ten seconds.
The Arkana has already earned a five-star safety rating from Euro NCAP (based on the Captur’s results, as the two are structurally almost identical). It offers a host of active systems fitted as standard, including autonomous emergency braking with pedestrian and cyclist detection, traffic sign recognition, a lane departure warning system and steering assistance to stay in your lane.
Prices for the Renault Arkana start at £25,300 and cars with both engines are available in three trim levels. The first cars are expected on UK roads in late August.
The second-generation Audi A5 first appeared in 2016 as basically a coupé version of the volume-selling A4 saloon. Shortly afterwards, it was joined by a cabriolet and the A5 Sportback – this tried to retain the coupé look while adding some extra practicality with another pair of doors and a liftback rear.
The A5 family received an update in late 2019, and was produced until early 2024 when it was discontinued as an all-new Audi A5 range was readied for production. According to the company’s new naming structure, the next-generation A5 will replace the previous Audi A4 range, so the next A5s will be saloons and estates rather than coupés, convertibles and liftbacks.
Reviewers generally liked the thinking behind this car, Motors dubbing it “one of the best-looking models in Audi’s range.” Other testers also considered the A5 Sportback to be a success, retaining the sharp looks of the A5 coupé despite creating a 580-litre boot. Auto Express highlighted the frameless windows and low roof line that ensured the car was not confused with the A4.
The interior earned plus marks too – “material quality is superb and all the minor controls are easy to make sense of,” said Honest John, while adding that the exterior visuals came at the cost of extensive rear-seat space.
Three petrol and two diesel engines were offered for the A5 Sportback, with the top versions of each also including all-wheel-drive (branded as quattro in Audi-speak). There were also two potent models – the S5, which had a 341hp diesel engine, and the RS 5 with 450hp of petrol power.
Reviewers generally favoured the diesels for their smoothness and economy, but accepted that ever more stringent tax laws steered most buyers to the petrols. “All the engines are smooth, quiet and powerful enough to feel luxurious,” said Carbuyer.
The on-the-road performance produced fewer plaudits – The Telegraph commented that the A5 Sportback was “very competent” but “still not a car that delivers the kind of exciting handling that makes a BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe so compelling.”
As of January 2025, the Audi A5 Sportback holds a Used Car Expert Rating score of E, with a score of 55%. It got good grades for its low CO2 emissions and media review scores, but the A5 range overall has a poor reliability record. It’s also not cheap to run, while its Euro NCAP safety rating has now expired.
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
The Car Expert
+
Score: 8.2 / 10 “Five-door hatchback practicality with the visual appeal of the two-door A5 Coupe, improved engines and plenty of technology make the A5 Sportback an attractive choice.” Read review
Auto Express
+
Model reviewed: Sportback range Score: 8 / 10 “If you’re in the market for a premium-badged coupe but still need a degree of practicality, then the Audi A5 Sportback is well worth a look. It’s better than ever.” Read review
Model reviewed: 3.0-litre diesel automatic S5 Score: 8 / 10 “Styling changes and tech upgrades are integrated well with a huge change for the Audi S5 Sportback’s powertrain. It’s a fast, relaxed and well-equipped premium model with quality at its heart, but also balances performance from its engine with rationality in terms of its efficiency.” Read review
Auto Trader
+
Model reviewed: Sportback range Score: 8 / 10 “The Audi A5 Sportback is a fine all-rounder: relaxed as a long-distance cruiser, but still capable of putting a smile on your face away from the main road.” Read review
Business Car
+
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic 40 TFSI S line Score: 7 / 10 “There’s no question the Audi A5 Sportback offers a lot to drivers who want to stand out in the office car park. This is especially true of S Line spec, where those big wheels, along with a bodykit package including more aggressive bumpers and side skirts.” Read review
Car
+
Model reviewed: 3.0-litre petrol automatic S5 Sportback Score: 6 / 10 “The Audi S5 Sportback is sufficiently quick enough to out-accelerate what’s arguably its main rival – the BMW 440i Gran Coupe – while being impressively refined. However, the refined but unexciting driving experience means the S5 can’t help but feel a little underwhelming.” Read review
Car Keys
+
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre diesel automatic Score: 7 / 10 “Although Audi models may not be everyone’s cup of tea, they still perform to a high standard. The A5 Sportback is no exception and although its rivals may have a lower starting price, it competes thanks to its excellent equipment, more-than-liveable driving feel and rather economic diesel units.” Read review
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre diesel automatic Score: 8 / 10 “If you are concerned about the A5 Coupe’s limited rear practicality, then the Sportback’s extra doors are handy but the space at the back may not be quite as much as you’d hoped.” Read review
Model reviewed: 3.0-litre petrol automatic S5 Sportback Score: 9 / 10 “If you want a gentle and reasonably practical premium coupe but also a feisty speed machine at the same time, then the Audi S5 Sportback can play either role in a convincing manner. It’s luxurious, the drive is sharp and the V6 is a lot of fun.” Read review
Carbuyer
+
Model reviewed: Sportback range Score: 8.4 / 10 “Contemporary looks, the latest technology and great practicality make the Audi A5 Sportback an interesting alternative to top executive saloons.” Read review
Carwow
+
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The Audi A5 Sportback combines coupe curves with a dose of practicality. It won’t accommodate five adults in comfort, though, and there’s more fun to be had driving alternatives.” Read review
Heycar
+
Model reviewed: Sportback range Score: 7 / 10 “The A5 Sportback is perfect for people looking for a stylish family car with an upmarket interior, low running costs and space for four adults on board. With its frameless windows, a sleek design that tapers towards the rear end and exclusive image, it feels even more premium than the excellent A4 saloon on which it’s based.” Read review
Honest John
+
Model reviewed: Sportback range Score: 8 / 10 “The Audi A5 Sportback combines the stylish looks of the A5 Coupe with extra practicality, thanks to its rear doors and more practical hatchback tailgate. The engine range is strong, with punchy performance and good economy, plus build quality is impeccable.” Read review
Motoring Research
+
Model reviewed: Range overview (coupé, cabriolet, Sportback) Score: 8 / 10 “If you’re prepared to sacrifice a little practicality in return for improved styling – and a higher price – the Audi A5 is one of the best looking cars in its class.” Read review
Motors
+
Model reviewed: Sportback range Score: 9 / 10 “The Audi A5 Sportback is a car to appeal to those who want something more stylish than an A4, but not without compromising on practicality or luxury. If comfort and refinement are your key priorities behind the wheel, the A5 would make an excellent choice.” Read review
The Telegraph
+
Model reviewed: Sportback range Score: 8 / 10 “It might be no more fun to drive than its coupe equivalent, but the Audi A5 Sportback brings a lot of extra space without compromising on the sleek styling. Its engines are brilliant, the interior classy and it is a fine car in which to cover long distances.” Read review
Top Gear
+
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7 / 10 “The Audi A5 Sportback is beautifully built and beautiful to look at. But the A4 is 98 per cent as good, cheaper and less pretentious.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
The Audi A5 was originally assessed by Euro NCAP back in 2016 and awarded a five-star rating. The Audi A5 Coupé and A5 Sportback share their safety rating with the Audi A4 range. The A5 Cabriolet does not have a safety rating as a result of the significant differences in its structure.
However, this rating expired in January 2022 and is no longer valid as the car no longer meets the standards required for such a rating. This is normal practice, as Euro NCAP reviews its ratings on most cars annually with most ratings expiring after about six or seven years.
However, if you are comparing a used A5 Sportback to vehicles of similar age, whose ratings will have probably also expired, its safety rating score is still useful.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
The Audi A5 Sportback was not tested by Green NCAP during its production life.
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
Total claims: 555 Average repair cost: £950.84 Last updated: October 2024
The Audi A5 family has a poor reliability score of just 30%, according to workshop data provided by our commercial partner, MotorEasy. This applies to all versions of the Audi A5 (cabriolet, coupé, Sportback) and to both generations (2007–2016 and 2017 onwards).
The big thing to look for is suspension trouble. As the MotorEasy data above shows, this is the most common issue found on Audi A5 models, costing around £440 to correct on average. Engine issues are almost as common and a lot more expensive, with the average repair cost clocking in at more than £1,200.
Gearbox problems have also been known to crop up and are by far the most expensive faults, costing around the £3,000 mark. Bear all of this in mind if you’re looking at a used Audi A5.
Running cost rating
Monthly cost of ownership data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by Clear Vehicle Data
Fuel consumption
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Petrol models
40 mpg
D
29 – 45 mpg
C – E
Diesel models
49 mpg
C
39 – 58 mpg
B – D
CO₂ output
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Petrol models
163 g/km
C
143 – 222 g/km
B – D
Diesel models
153 g/km
B
127 – 191 g/km
A – C
Insurance group
Average
Score
Variation
Score
All models
34
C
28 – 50
B – F
Service and maintenance
Cost
Score
Year 1
£283
C
Year 2
£743
C
Year 3
£1,235
C
Year 4
£1,513
C
Year 5
£2,041
C
Overall
£5,815
C
The Audi A5 Sportback has fairly high running costs, according to data exclusively provided by our commercial partner Clear Vehicle Data.
Petrol models offer 40 mpg on average, – the petrol-powered A5 Coupé is more efficient, but the Sportback is on par with rivals like the BMW 4 Series Gran Coupé. As you might expect, diesel models are the more fuel-efficient choice. Insurance premiums and maintenance costs are pretty average compared to its liftback rivals.
Date: February 2022 Recall number: R/2022/036 Model types: All Build dates: 11/2019 to 02/2021 Number of vehicles affected: 5,327 Defect: Following a previous campaign, the toe and/or camber values on the rear axle may, in certain circumstances, incorrectly be changed without this being noticed. Remedy: The wheel alignment must be checked and, if necessary, the suspension must be serviced on the affected vehicles.
Date: June 2021 Recall number: R/2021/236 Model types: All Build dates: 11/2019 to 02/2021 Number of vehicles affected: 10,089 Defect: One or more nuts which do not meet the specifications may have been fitted on the rear axle suspension links. Remedy: The affected nuts on the rear axle will be replaced on affected vehicles.
Date: June 2021 Recall number: R/2021/204 Model types: All Build dates: 12/2015 to 12/2018 Number of vehicles affected: 263 Defect: Vehicles may have been fitted with a hinged towing bracket on which the locking mechanism in the hinge module could be faulty. Remedy: The hinge module for the towing bracket must be checked and, where necessary, replaced on the vehicles affected.
Date: October 2020 Recall number: R/2020/302 Model types: All Build dates: 07/2020 Number of vehicles affected: 8 Defect: The seat frame may not have been bolted correctly to the seat rail on the driver and/or front passenger side. Remedy: Check the affected seat frame connection and replace the frame if required.
Date: June 2020 Recall number: R/2020/138 Model types: All Build dates: 06/2017 to 03/2020 Number of vehicles affected: 34,982 Defect: It is possible that moisture may enter the belt-driven starter-alternator. Remedy: The starter-alternator must be replaced on the affected vehicles.
Date: June 2019 Recall number: R/2019/175 Model types: All Build dates: 12/2015 to 12/2018 Number of vehicles affected: 135 Defect: Hinged towing bracket on which the locking mechanism in the hinge module could be faulty. Remedy: The hinge module for the towing bracket must be checked and replaced if required.
Date: May 2019 Recall number: R/2019/149 Model types: All Build dates: 02/2019 to 03/2019 Number of vehicles affected: 85 Defect: An error in the casting process may affect the rigidity of the shock absorber fork. Remedy: The corresponding shock absorber forks must be replaced on the affected vehicles.
Date: December 2018 Recall number: R/2018/365 Model types: All Build dates: 02/2017 to 07/2017 Number of vehicles affected: 8 Defect: Airbag securing bolts may not be to the correct torque. Remedy: Check and replace bolts as required.
Date: February 2017 Recall number: R/2017/078 Model types: All Build dates: 05/2016 to 10/2016 Number of vehicles affected: 2,622 Defect: Due to an error in the manufacturing process, the airbag and/or seat belt pretensioner may not trigger in the event of a collision. Remedy: On affected vehicles, replace airbag assembly and seat belt pretensioner where necessary.
As of September 2024, there have been nine DVSA vehicle safety recalls on the Audi A5 range covering various different issues.
Not all vehicles are affected by recalls. You can check to see if your car is included in any of the above recalls by visiting the DVLA website or contacting your local Audi dealer.
If your car is affected by a recall, the vehicle must be repaired and you should not be charged for any work required. If you are buying a used A5, you should insist that any outstanding recall work is completed before you take delivery of the vehicle.
Similar cars
If you’re looking at the Audi A5 Sportback , you might also be interested in these alternatives
The junior executive premium liftback market is a bit of a niche, even by Audi and BMW standards, for those who want the practicality and brand cachet of a premium German badge but wanting something just a bit sleeker than the regular Audi A4 or BMW 3 Series. The Kia Stinger offers a good-value option that is also distinctive.
Mazda intends to continue making petrol and diesel engines for its future cars – even after countries start banning their sale.
The Japanese manufacturer has reiterated its belief in the future of more efficient internal combustion (i/c) engines, as other makes, such as Audi, announce the dates when they will completely stop making them and switch entirely to electric propulsion.
And Mazda is also throwing its weight behind developments in more environmentally-friendly synthetic and renewable fuels.
The brand has for some years been taking a different route to other manufacturers in reducing emissions, targeting technology gains rather than the industry standard of downsizing existing internal-combustion engines and rushing to electric. Mazda’s first production full battery-electric vehicle (BEV), the MX-30, was only launched earlier this year.
However the new technology, dubbed Skyactiv and stretching across engines, transmissions and chassis, has been preparing the ground for electricity. Innovations have included idling stop-start systems and regenerative braking, along with designs that allow multiple models to be built on one production line, with efficiency gains and emissions savings.
Mazda UK boss Jeremy Thomson – taking a different path towards carbon reduction.
“The aim for our products of the next generation, along with the ongoing development of the i/c engine, is to improve the platforms in line with advancing electrification, in other words creating architecture capable of offering multiple solutions,” Mazda UK managing director Jeremy Thomson told The Car Expert.
More electrics
The brand has recently changed its electrification plans, however. A ‘Sustainability 2030 Zoom Zoom road map” released in 2017 aimed to reduce CO2 emissions by 50% over 2010 levels by 2030, and by 90% by 2050, and that BEVs would make up 5% of the Mazda model line-up by 2035.
This has now been evolved, according to Thomson “reflecting the direction of travel globally”, and now the aim is for 25% BEV sales by 2030. “The remaining 75% will have some form of electrification on top of the highly efficient i/c engine,” Thomson says, adding that Mazda also intends to make its entire business carbon neutral in all areas, including its offices and suppliers, by 2050.
Calling these “ambitious objectives”, Thomson emphasises that Mazda is not “giving up” on petrol and diesel engines. “They will still power the majority of our cars through the world in 2030 and in order to reduce CO2 we have to continue to develop and improve the efficiency of the i/c engine as the globe slowly transitions to electrification.
“We remain committed to creating the ideal combustion engine, and our e-Skyactiv-x engine technology is evolving to get us closer to the perfect engine in terms of emissions and efficiency.”
Mazda launched its first battery-electric production model, the MX-30, only this year.
Future plans include mild hybrids, plug-in hybrids, full BEVs and hybrids using a rotary engine as a generator, but also four and six-cylinder petrol and diesel engines.
“Globally between 2022 and 2025, we will launch five hybrids, five plug-in hybrids and three BEVs from our scaleable architecture,” Thomson said, though he would not specify which of these models would be sold in the UK.
Could fuel be the key?
Developments in fuels are crucial to the future of the internal combustion engine. In Japan, Mazda is part of a collaboration of academics, industry and Government looking at algae-based, renewable fuels.
In Europe, the brand has joined the E-fuel alliance, promoting the development use of fuels made by synthesising atmospheric carbon and hydrogen to create synthetic petrol and diesel.
Mazda has joined the e-Fuel Alliance developing renewable and synthetic fuels.
“A synthetic or renewable carbon-neutral liquid fuel that can replace the current carbon-based fuel infrastructure is the most efficient way to reduce CO2 for cars on the roads today and i/c engines to come,” Thomson says.
“Through renewable fuels we would be able to decarbonise the transport fleet across the globe quickly and efficiently with little disruption to commerce and people’s lives. It would enable those who continue to drive with internal combustion engines to contribute to CO2 reduction without the cost of changing to electric.”
Few cars excite at the mention of their name but the Volkswagen Golf GTI does – launched in 1976 as the first recognised hot hatch, the eighth generation version arrived in 2019 and is still much desired by performance enthusiasts.
Today’s Golf GTI is powered by a 2.0-litre petrol engine – at launch it produced 245hp, which was boosted to 265 when the model was updated in 2024 – while there is also a Clubsport model with 300hp targeting more hardcore rivals such as the Honda Civic Type R.
Testers rate the GTI highly – Carbuyer dubs the car “the closest thing hot hatch fans have to the Porsche 911,” and adds that it is almost a segment in its own right, prioritising an exemplary chassis over prodigious power.
Several reviews highlight the Golf GTI’s versatility – while it offers plenty of performance, it can be docile when needed, a hot hatch equally at home on the morning school run.
Minus points? Only a precious few. The Telegraph points out that while it’s the best-looking Mk8 Golf, the GTI does not visually impress, and the interior is unexciting, with its touchscreen controls being less than user-friendly.
Some reviewers add that the car has been getting steadily more expensive and can no longer claim to be an affordable hot hatch. It is also no longer a viable choice as a company car, excluded by emissions-based tax regulations.
The more potent Clubsport, meanwhile, is considered even more desirable, but too expensive for many to justify.
But these are considered minor gripes among testers who universally rate the Golf GTI and particularly its special editions – the Clubsport 45 model is according to Auto Express “one of the best cars ever to wear the GTI badge.”
As of October 2025, the Volkswagen Golf GTI holds a New Car Expert Rating of B, with a score of 68%. It scores top marks for its excellent safety rating, while media review scores are also good. However, ownership costs drag the overall score down from an even better ranking, while Volkswagen’s new car warranty coverage is poor compared to some other brands.
Model reviewed: GTI Clubsport Score: 8 / 10 “The new Volkswagen Golf GTI Clubsport offers an impressive list of upgrades that will appeal to driving enthusiasts, and for not that much more money than the regular GTI. However, it’s not nearly as engaging or exciting to drive as the Honda Civic Type R, and the interior doesn’t feel special in any way.” Author: Ellis Hyde Read review
Model reviewed: New Volkswagen Golf GTI Clubsport 45 2021 Score: 9 / 10 “On the surface the Volkswagen Golf GTI Clubsport 45 looks much like any other special edition model, but in reality it’s a strong and compelling way to celebrate 45 years of the Golf GTI. It might also be one of the last petrol-powered cars to wear the magic badge, so it’s a good job it’s also one of the best.” Read review
Business Car
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre petrol automatic Score: 8 / 10 “The Volkswagen Golf GTI feels agile and willing to turn in, stays flat and nicely balanced through the bend, and gives the driver plenty of confidence to get on the power again on exit, with the electronic diff and computer systems eliminating understeer.” Read review
Car Keys
Score: 9 / 10 “Despite a firmer ride, the Golf GTi remains a seriously likeable hot hatch that continues to be one of the best in the business.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8.4 / 10 “Favouring precision over power, the Volkswagen Golf GTI is a sophisticated hot hatch” Author: Charlie Harvey, Alex Ingram Read review
Evo
Model reviewed: Clubsport 2021 Score: 8 / 10 “The Volkswagen Golf GTi Clubsport is feels genuinely fast, and its dynamics are very impressive.” Read review
Honest John
Model reviewed: Range overview “The eighth-generation Golf GTI brings with it a comprehensive standard equipment package, including styling upgrades, new convenience features and the latest driver assistance systems.” Read review
Motoring Research
Model reviewed: 2024 facelift Score: 8 / 10 “A mid-life update has fixed some of the Mk8 Volkswagen Golf GTI’s problems, restoring its status as the benchmark hot hatch. As a sporty and relatively affordable car you could drive every day, it still presents a strong case.” Author: Tim Pitt Read review
Model reviewed: Standard model (pre-facelift) “The latest Volkswagen Golf GTI looks sportier, goes faster and feels more focused. Many will consider that an improvement, and the Golf remains a softer, more ‘everyday’ option than several cars in this class. If you can live with the frustrating tech – and you can – there’s still much to enjoy here.” Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “Hot hatch for grown-ups is still a brilliant all-rounder” Read review
The Sun
“Volkswagen Golf GTI is an all-round legend and all the car you’ll ever need.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: Score: 8 / 10 “The Golf GTI is harder than ever to justify. It doesn’t quite have the edge or the pace of its rivals – though it comes close – yet it costs as much to buy. And while it’s just as practical as it always was, its infotainment system and finicky touch-sensitive controls mean it’s less user-friendly than before.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
The Volkswagen Golf GTI shares its Euro NCAP safety rating with the mainstream Golf range. It was initially awarded a five-star rating back in 2019, then re-tested in October 2025, retaining its rating.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
As of October 2025, the Volkswagen Golf GTI has not yet been lab tested by Green NCAP. It’s unlikely to be a priority for the organisation, but if it is tested then we’ll post the results here.
Running cost rating
Monthly cost of ownership data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by Clear Vehicle Data
Fuel consumption
Average
Score
Petrol models
38 mpg
D
CO₂ output
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Petrol models
167 g/km
D
Insurance group
Average
Score
Variation
Score
All models
31
C
Service and maintenance
Cost
Score
Year 1
£213
C
Year 2
£550
C
Year 3
£909
C
Year 4
£1,186
C
Year 5
£1,644
C
Overall
£4,502
C
The Volkswagen Golf GTI is a relatively expensive car to own and run, according to whole-life cost numbers provided exclusively to The Car Expert by our data partner, Clear Vehicle Data.
Fuel consumption is poor compared to lower-end Golfs, which is no surprise, while service and maintenance costs over the course of five years of ownership are average – as are insurance premiums, which is not bad for a hot hatch of this price.
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
Total claims: 1262 Average repair cost: £570.50 Last updated: April 2025
As of April 2025 (our most recent data point), the Volkswagen Golf family has middling overall reliability score, according to exclusive extended warranty data provided by our partners at MotorEasy. However, this applies to all Golf models in MotorEasy’s database, so will be a combination of the current Mk8 and the previous Mk7 (pre-2020).
The average repair cost of £570 is fairly average – but much more than the cost of a used car warranty, which is certainly worth bearing in mind.
The majority of problems with the Golf relate to the engine or suspension, and although engine repairs usually cost around £900, suspension issues fortunately tend not to be too expensive with an average repair cost of about £240. Gearbox problems are expensive, at more than £1,300, but the good news is that these are relatively rare.
If you’re looking at a used Volkswagen Golf of any kind, make sure any extended warranty cover you purchase covers all of these potential problem areas.
Warranty rating
New car warranty information for the Volkswagen Golf GTI
Overall rating
E
15%
New car warranty duration
3 years
New car warranty mileage
60,000 miles
Battery warranty duration
0 years
Battery warranty mileage
0 miles
Volkswagen’s new car warranty is pretty much the bare minimum offered by car manufacturers in the UK, and worse than rival brands in a similar price bracket as the Golf GTI. The duration is three years, with a limit of 60,000 miles, which is pretty basic. Some rivals offer up to seven years of cover.
Warranty on a used Volkswagen Golf GTI
If you are buying an ‘Approved Used’ Volkswagen Golf GTI from an official Volkswagen dealership, you will get a minimum 12-month warranty included.
If you are buying a used Volkswagen Golf GTI from an independent dealership, any warranty offered will vary and will probably be managed by a third-party warranty company.
If you are buying a used Volkswagen Golf GTI from a private seller, there are no warranty protections beyond any remaining portion of the original new car warranty.
If you’re looking to buy any used car that is approaching the end of its warranty period, a used car warranty is usually a worthwhile investment. Check out The Car Expert’s guide to the best used car warranty providers, which will probably be cheaper than a warranty sold by a dealer.estment. Check out The Car Expert’s guide to the best used car warranty providers, which will probably be cheaper than a warranty sold by a dealer.
Recalls
Official DVSA safety recalls that have been issued for the Volkswagen Golf GTI
2024
2022
2021
2020
Date: January 2024 Recall number: R/2024/014 Model types: All Build dates: 03/2020 to 08/2022 Number of vehicles affected: 26,721 Defect: On certain vehicles with electromechanical brake servo and DSG (Direct Shift Gearbox) of a limited production period, there is a possibility that a heat protection mat was incorrectly fitted. In individual cases, the brake fluid reservoir can melt and cause a brake fluid leak into the engine compartment. Remedy: A check of the installation of the heat protection mat on affected vehicles will be conducted. If necessary, the correct heat shield condition will be restored, and in a damage case, the damaged components will be replaced.
Date: April 2022 Recall number: R/2022/086 Model types: All Build dates: 01/2019 to 02/2022 Number of vehicles affected: 1,868 Defect: The fuse in the high-voltage system of plug-in hybrid vehicles was, in some cases, produced with too little so-called fire sand. Remedy: An additional protective insulating mat is to be fitted to the switching unit for the high-voltage battery.
Date: March 2022 Recall number: R/2022/074 Model types: All Build dates: 09/2020 to 02/2022 Number of vehicles affected: 7,579 Defect: Engine compartment covers were fitted that, regardless of use (very sporty driving style or poor road condition) and operating period, could come loose from their attachment. Remedy: On all affected vehicles, the engine compartment cover has to be removed.
Date: September 2021 Recall number: R/2021/320 Model types: All Build dates: 01/2019 to 05/2021 Number of vehicles affected: 145 Defect: The bolted connection of the pull rod between the electromechanical brake servo and brake pedal may come loose, resulting in a loss of all service braking ability. Remedy: Vehicles are not to be driven, and the bolted connection of the input rod between the electromechanical brake servo and brake pedal must be checked and, if necessary, retightened.
Date: February 2021 Recall number: R/2021/320 Model types: All Build dates: 09/2020 Number of vehicles affected: 124 Defect: Faulty crash sensors for airbag and restraint systems may have been fitted in the front doors. Remedy: The crash sensors in the front doors are to be checked and, if necessary, replaced.
Date: June 2020 Recall number: R/2020/176 Model types: All Build dates: 03/2020 to 05/2020 Number of vehicles affected: 4,630 Defect: The e-call service may not function. Remedy: Update the Online Control Unit software on affected vehicles.
As of September 2024 (our most recent data point), there have been six DVSA vehicle safety recalls on this generation of the Volkswagen Golf range to address different issues.
Not all vehicles are affected by recalls. You can check to see if your car is included in any of the above recalls by visiting the DVLA website or contacting your local Volkswagen dealer.
If your car is affected by a recall, the vehicle must be repaired and you should not be charged for any work required. If you are buying a used Golf GTI, you should insist that any outstanding recall work is completed before you take delivery of the vehicle.
A wide range of performance cars stack up against the Volkswagen Golf GTI. Some are better but the VW still scores, well, because it is the Golf GTI. Prime rivals include the Ford Focus ST and Cupra Leon, while the Clubsport GTI competes against more hardcore alternatives such as the Honda Civic Type R and Hyundai i30 N.
The Porsche Cayman first appeared in 2005, effectively as a hard-top version of the second-generation Boxster cabriolet. The current model launched in 2016, when both the Cayman coupé and Boxster convertible gained the 718 moniker, recalling a 1950s Porsche sports car. More pertinently, it also switched from naturally-aspirated versions of Porsche’s signature flat-six engine to mostly turbocharged flat-four units.
Mid-engined and cheaper than other models propelled from the rear, the Cayman is sometimes derided as a “poor man’s 911.” Reviewers are generally positive about it, though disappointed at the emissions-led change in engines.
Four power outputs are on offer, ranging from 300hp of the regular Cayman to the 420hp of the hardcore GT4 model.
This and the GTS were launched after other Cayman variants, and saw a return to six-cylinder power. “They’re expensive,” says The Telegraph, but “these are the sort of cars about which you’ll remember the driving quality long after you’ve forgotten the price.”
Testers praise the excellent handling of the Cayman, so much so that the more recently introduced lightweight T model is not considered different enough to justify its price – “the standard Cayman is such a find-handling car that 90% of drivers would never sufficiently exploit the T’s chassis to notice the extra benefits it brings,” says Auto Express.
Some reviewers point out that the interior does not include the modern touchscreens of other Porsches, but others consider this a good thing. And it is regarded as a minor issue in a car with prodigious potency and exemplary handling – Top Gear describes the Cayman as “a fantastic sports car with a real breadth of ability.”
As of March 2026, the Porsche 718 Cayman holds a New Car Expert Rating of D, with a score of 57%. Although it’s an excellent sports car and media reviews are full of praise for its driving dynamics, the ownership data drags the Cayman’s score down. Its CO2 emissions are poor, as is its reliability record, while running costs are extremely high.
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
Featured reviews
“The Porsche 718 Cayman departs Porsche’s line-up as one of the best all-round sports cars it’s ever had in its offering. The years under the platform’s wheels (its bones date all the way back to 2012) have left none in doubt of its status as a standard-bearing sports car, right to the end.”
“It may not look any different, but this new Porsche 718 Cayman GTS is a transformation – and the pick of the range. At face value, it may seem pricey compared with a regular Cayman S, but the extra cash is worth it for the new naturally-aspirated 4.0-litre engine alone.”
Model reviewed: GTS “The Porsche 718 Cayman GTS is a bit of cracker. It’s sharp, nimble and brilliantly suited to the UK’s roads – and it gets better the harder you drive it.” Author: Jack Evans Read review
Auto Express
Model reviewed: GT4 Score: 10 / 10 “The new Porsche Cayman GT4 is one of the best performance car bargains of the last decade.” Read review
Model reviewed: Cayman T 2.0-litre petrol automatic Score: 8 / 10 “However you specify it, the Porsche 718 Cayman is a fantastic sports car that can hold a torch to models costing twice the price.” Read review
Auto Trader
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The Porsche 718 Cayman looks a million dollars and, when it comes to handling and driving fun, sits right at the top of the pile. What’s more, its sublime steering, superb control weights and exceptional ride quality make it a brilliant long-distance GT.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: T Score: 8 / 10 “Yes, it’s a four-cylinder 2.0-litre turbo and we’ll get this out of the way now: it doesn’t sound like naturally-aspirated flat-six – because it’s not.” Read review
Model reviewed: 718 Cayman GT4 Score: 10 / 10 “The latest Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 remains one of the most impressive and enjoyable road cars to drive on a circuit, especially if you subscribe to the theory that less equals more, and value the way a car makes you feel rather than its outright speed.” Read review
Model reviewed: 718 Cayman GTS Score: 8 / 10 “The GTS polarises. It is expensive, it does not have a clear edge on performance, and the engine is no more refined than the lesser engines. On the other hand, it looks sexier, has a potentially higher resale value and when everything falls into place the 360bhp Cayman easily matches the 444bhp 911 in grins-per-mile.” Read review
Model reviewed: 718 Cayman S Score: 10 / 10 “We love the Porsche 718 Cayman. It’s a bit like Usain Bolt. Still brilliant and best in class – we just rue the passing of that super six-cylinder from yesteryear. We remember how much more sizzling Bolt was back at Beijing and London; but he was still at the top of the podium in Rio too.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: (range review) Score: 8.6 / 10 “The Porsche 718 Cayman is a joy to drive, a pleasure to sit in and great to look at. It’s just a shame the turbo engines are more sensible than they are characterful.” Read review
Evo
Model reviewed: 718 Cayman GT4 Score: 10 / 10 “For a combination of pure driver appeal and value, the Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 has no rivals. An instant modern classic, if ever there was one.” Read review
Model reviewed: 718 Cayman GTS Score: 9 / 10 “Even with lots of suspension and drivetrain trickery, you can’t quite ignore the noise from the 718’s unlovable engine.” Read review
Model reviewed: (range review) Score: 8 / 10 “Whether it’s the base Cayman or the GTS, the 718’s fine handling outshines its disappointing engine.” Read review
Model reviewed: S Score: 9 / 10 “Turbo engine is a step back, but Cayman S still a gem.” Read review
Honest John
Model reviewed: (range review) “Styling changes are minimal, with the Porsche 718 Cayman basically a very thoroughly facelifted version of the outgoing car. The interior architecture remains, albeit now including the latest version of Porsche’s multimedia interface.” Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 9.2 / 10 “A sublime sports car: Porsche’s cheapest coupe may also be its best” Read review
The Sunday Times
Model reviewed: 718 Cayman GTS Score: 6 / 10 “The previous generation Porsche Cayman GTS was sublime. This one isn’t.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: 4.0-litre petrol manual GTS Score: 10 / 10 “While we’ve become used to the instant low-rev torque of turbo engines and electric motors, there is something immensely satisfying about a large capacity, naturally-aspirated engine and few do it as well as Porsche.” Read review
Model reviewed: 718 Cayman T Score: 10 / 10 “Simple but highly effective changes make the already-great Porsche 718 Cayman into that little-bit-greater-still 718 Cayman T. Blinding chassis, strong drivetrain, appealing character – this is a first-class sports car.” Read review
Top Gear
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The base engines are gruff, but the handling is as sweet as ever. Very few sports cars are this complete.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
No safety rating
As of March 2026, the Porsche 718 Cayman has not been crash tested by Euro NCAP.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
As of March 2026, the Porsche 718 Cayman has not been lab tested by Green NCAP.
Given that the Cayman is a high-performance, petrol-engined sports car that prioritises performance over economy, it’s unlikely to win any environmental awards…
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
Total claims: 31 Average repair cost: £1427.37 Last updated: April 2025
The Porsche 718 Cayman has a reliability score that’s below average, according to workshop and warranty data provided exclusively to The Car Expert by our partners at MotorEasy.
According to the warranty claim data, the average repair costs are very high, thanks to very expensive engine repairs which average more than £4,900 to fix.
If you’re looking at a used Porsche 718 Cayman, make sure any extended warranty cover you purchase covers all of the potential problem areas shown above.
Awards
Trophies, prizes and awards that the Porsche 718 Cayman has received
2022
Top Gear Awards – Best Performance Car (GT4 RS)
2017
World Car Awards – World Performance Car
Similar cars
If you’re looking at the Porsche 718 Cayman, you might also be interested in these alternatives
Electric vehicle owners queueing to use charging points at motorway service areas may in future not have to gaze longingly at rows of unused Tesla Superchargers.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has said that he intends to open up the brand’s Supercharger charging network to other types of electric vehicles.
Tesla has established a major network across the globe of DC fast-chargers – now numbering more than 25,000. But these use a specific plug to ensure only the brand’s cars can use them. While in some countries adaptors are marketed to suit Tesla chargers, generally these points have not been available to other makes of EV.
In the UK, rows of Tesla Superchargers are a familiar sight in motorway service areas, usually greatly outnumbering charge points for other electric vehicles.
Musk revealed his plans to open up the network in a reply to a tweet on his Twitter feed, and said it would happen later in 2021.
He did not specify which cars would be able to use Tesla points or where charge points would be opened up but, according to reports in the US, discussions have been underway in Germany, Sweden and Norway.
Despite this view, Tesla supercharger networks at motorway services are seldom completely full-up.
Tesla has previously sold its cars on the basis of drivers having access to an exclusive fast-charging network and not having to sign up to a range of subscriptions in order to recharge their cars. But the US reports suggest that freeing up the network would enable Tesla to tap into a range of government funding.
How quickly any such expansion might come to the UK, and what cars would be compatible with the chargers, remains open to question. Some sources suggest that Tesla has previously made such an offer but under such onerous terms that all other car manufacturers rejected them.
However other reports claim that Tesla is even considering modifying its connectors on future models, to adopt similar designs to other EVs.
Any opening up of the Tesla network would certainly be welcome at motorway service areas planning how to cope with the expansion of EV use. Speaking in 2019, hydrogen fuel-cell proponent Hugo Spowers claimed that to provide EV charging facilities equivalent to the throughput a single petrol pump at a motorway services sees in one hour, would require electrical infrastructure sufficient to power a village of 38,000 homes.
As more of us lease and finance cars, rather than buying them outright, will the future of GAP insurance become more or less relevant?
We spoke to ALA Insurance (one of The Car Expert’s commercial partners) to find out more about what changes are currently going on in the specialist insurance market and what we can expect from the future of GAP insurance.
GAP insurance is one of the UK’s most misunderstood insurance products. For most people, the first time they hear about GAP is at the car dealership as they’re buying a car. In the words of ALA Insurance CEO, Simon England, dealerships have treated this type of insurance “like a profit centre, doing the industry a fair bit of reputational damage”.
In simplest terms, GAP insurance provides additional cover over and above what your standard car insurance will pay out in the event that your car is declared a total loss (which basically means stolen or written-off). The exact amount that you receive depends on the type of GAP policy you have taken out, which is something car dealers are not too hot at explaining.
Undoing the damage
So what is the reputation damage that Simon England mentioned? Until legislation was introduced to protect consumers, most GAP sales took place where dealers pressured buyers to buy a policy on the spot – at a vastly inflated price – when they were buying a car. The typical method was to instil fear into the buyer that they could lose all the money they were in the process of spending, and that a GAP policy from the dealer was the only way to protect that investment.
Nowadays, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) limits dealers’ commissions on GAP to no more than 50%, which automatically limits how much a dealer can mark-up a policy price. Dealers also need to hold off 48 hours before selling a customer a GAP insurance policy after first introducing it, to give buyers time to research and make a more informed choice.
This has resulted in many smaller, more independent dealers no longer offering GAP insurance policies, as it’s no longer as lucrative. Some of the larger networks, however, are known to continue applying less ethical practices. This may involve outsourcing potential buyers to third-party telemarketers, calling new car owners with a 30-day guarantee.
England argues “People don’t need to be sold to like that. This creates so many issues, not least with the use of data.”
Indeed, many consumers rely on government regulations to trust their data is being secured appropriately, but there will always be leaks – and the more people who have access to your personal information, the more potential there is for your details to be compromised. Even within the last year, dealership network Sandicliffe Motor Group was the victim of a targeted cyber attack, in which hundreds of customers’ bank account details and medical histories may have been compromised.
England argues that there’s a better way to do business and that figures from the pandemic support such a claim. He says “We’ve seen a 30% growth in policy numbers in the pandemic. Where before 80% of policies were sold through dealers, the pandemic has encouraged car buyers online to do more research”
This has also sparked change in the marketplace as well. Where 70% of GAP policies have traditionally been taken out on new vehicles, ALA Insurance says the split between new and used cars is now more like 50/50.
There’s also a remarkable difference in those considering GAP insurance. “There’s a misconception that GAP is only required for cars bought on finance,” England explains.
“Understanding the complete loss of a vehicle, leaving you with a burdensome debt is perhaps much easier to cognitively appreciate than a chunky loss of your savings and your vehicle if you’re a cash buyer. Yet, in either scenario, the vehicle owner is left in the same position; no car, no way to replace like-for-like.”
So what does the future of GAP insurance look like?
Looking at the way the insurance landscape is changing, the increasing use of technology and more hyperflexible policies – even enabling customers to be covered for a few hours in someone else’s vehicle – England acknowledges there are areas ripe for change in this sector.
Increased trustworthiness
It seems internet misinformation campaigns aren’t limited to the political arena, and trustworthiness is imperative for the credibility of any insurance policy.
Internet-savvy shoppers will usually get the best deals, since they’re already comfortable with buying online and rely on customer reviews – from providers like Trustpilot or Reevoo – to determine the trustworthiness of a company. England says that ALA’s telephone operators are not commission-based, so their only job is to assist you rather than sell you a policy.
Integration of advanced technology
The ‘own fault’ designation accounts for almost 35% of claims. (Somewhat surprisingly, the data shows that there are more accidents in better weather, suggesting drivers are more careful when the road conditions are poorer.) With the growth and normalisation of advanced driver assistance systems, which in the future will include more driver health monitoring, there’ll likely be fewer accidents through loss of control.
Insurance companies are already seeing an increase in the use of dashcams to determine liability in claims. It’s resulting in less fraud and a 30% increase in split liability, according to dashcam manufacturer Nextbase, and more tracker devices are being installed to mitigate against theft, which accounts for almost 25% of claims.
All of this means calculating the value of policies and the damage sustained in accidents will be much more accurate and that should, in theory at least, result in more competitive policy pricing.
Shift in car ownership
England cites changes in car ownership as one of the biggest factors for the GAP insurance market. The shift to personal contract purchase (PCP) finance, leasing and subscription-based acquisition models (for both new and used vehicles) suggests a growing need for specialised GAP products that cover finance liability as well as the original vehicle price. This is largely because your financial liability in a total loss situation is likely to be more
Freak weather
In recent years, the climate change conversation has grown. Though ALA’s statistics show flooding and tree damage only accounts for 4% of total claims, the unpredictability of weather patterns means GAP insurance may be even more suitable.
For example, the risk of your car being written off is higher if you live in a high-risk flood area, which can alter the risk-to-benefit ratio of taking out a GAP insurance policy. Flood damage can easily lead to a car being declared a total loss, as the complicated electronics in all modern cars are really not designed to be submerged in water.
In closing…
The GAP insurance sector, like other specialist insurances, has room to grow and improve to become a better-understood product. With car dealers no longer allowed to sell GAP on the spot, opportunities have opened up for online providers to disrupt the markte and provide much better value for customers.
Here at The Car Expert, we’ve seen enormous demand for all the GAP insurance content that we’ve produced over the last six months or so, as car buyers seek out more information on exactly what GAP is and whether it’s right for them.
Climbing back from a perception of oversold policies is no mean feat, but the future of GAP insurance seems bright. Simon England remains confident that the right GAP policy can suit anyone driving a car less than 12 years old and is certain that “if you buy it right, [GAP insurance] is affordable.”
The all-electric MG5 family estate car has gained a new model option extending its potential range by more than 35 miles.
A 61.1kWh battery pack sees the car’s official WLTP-certified range between charges rise from 214 miles to 250 miles. MG adds that the potential range grows to 334 miles if the car is used solely for urban driving with lots of speed changes, with resultant energy recovery from regenerative braking.
The new battery pack can be recharged to 80% capacity in 61 minutes using a 50kW rapid charger – this time drops to 40 minutes using a 100kW charger. A full overnight charge on a domestic home charger takes around 9.5 hours.
Propulsion is provided by a 115kW electric motor, equivalent to 156hp. This gives the car a 7.3-second 0-60mph time and a top speed where permitted of 115mph.
MG’s Pilot driver assistance system, which debuted on the ZS SUV, extends to the MG5 with the new model. It comprises a suite of active safety technologies including autonomous emergency braking, adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping, traffic-jam, high-beam and speed limit assistance.
MG also offers the ZS EV and the HS plug-in hybrid, claiming that the electric percentage of its model range is four times the average among other brands.
The MG5 claimed the title of first estate EV in Europe when it launched in October 2020. The car’s makers expect it to particularly appeal to fleet buyers trying to improve their green credentials, due to the large boot that offers up to 578 litres of spaces extending to 1456 with the rear seats folded.
Already on sale, the longer-range MG5 is priced at £26,495 after the Government’s plug-in grant is included. For the present it will be sold alongside the existing MG5 EV. It also carries MG’s standard seven-year/80,000-mile warranty.
The MG ZS EV was a compact electric SUV, launched in the UK in 2019 and discontinued in early 2025 when it was replaced by the all-new MG S5 EV.
MG’s rebirth under Chinese ownership has been massively successful, with the brand now a genuinely major player in the UK car market. Much of this success has come from its electric models, like the MG ZS EV seen here.
The MG ZS EV was a small electric SUV, which found more praise than might be expected from seasoned road testers in the UK media. Auto Express said it has “… real appeal – as a second car, company car or an affordable route into a pure electric vehicle.”
As the name suggests, this was a battery-electric version of the contemporary petrol-powered MG ZS small SUV, which was produced from 2017 to 2024. Replacing the petrol engine with a 105kW electric motor and 45kwh battery, the ZS EV became a significantly better vehicle.
The electric motor was much quieter and smoother than the petrol engine in the regular ZS, which made it a far nicer place to spend time. And like every model in the MG family, you got a lot of car for your money. The ZS EV undercut other small electric SUVs by thousands of pounds, making it a very affordable way to make the switch to an electric car.
In addition to its price advantage, the MG ZS EV offered plenty of practicality. It was surprisingly roomy inside, and in our own The Car Expert review we highlighted substantially more boot space than non-EV rivals such as the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-3.
Interior finish was nothing to get excited about but, as several reviews pointed out, for its price some hard plastics in evidence was hardly surprising. The review in the Daily Mirror also found that the driving experience was nothing to be sneezed at, as the MG’s “… low-down centre of gravity, due to the batteries, gives a secure feel and the ride quality is better than in many crossovers.”
The ZS EV was updated in late 2021. Crucially, this update saw a larger battery provided, which increased driving range from 163 miles to a far more usable 273 miles. That alone made the later ZS EV a far more viable option for many households.
As of June 2025, the MG ZS EV holds a Used CarExpert Rating of A with a score of 71%, which is significantly better than the petrol version. The facelifted model scored significantly better than the original model, which is worth bearing in mind if you’re shopping for a used ZS EV.
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
Featured reviews
“One of the biggest compliments paid to the MG ZS is that those seeking a smaller SUV should consider it alongside much bigger-selling models from the better-known names in the business, so it’s no surprise that MG has chosen this car with which to step into the electric arena.”
Model reviewed: 2021 Facelift Score: 8 / 10 ” It’s a bargain EV for those prioritising range and roominess on a budget, but there are compromises to make on quality. It won’t suit everyone, but it’s an appealingly affordable electric SUV.” Read review
Business Car
Model reviewed: Trophy Connect Long Range Score: 8 / 10 “Looking to make the switch to EV power but still having concerns over range and affordability? Well, MG’s tweaked ZS EV SUV could be the answer.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: Score: 6 / 10 “It’s the electric SUV for people who just want an electric SUV. Not a posh badge. Not a sub five-second 0-62mph time. And not a two-speed transmission with a shiftable planetary gear set.
The MG ZS EV is cheaper than its rivals with better battery tech than most.” Read review
Car Keys
Model reviewed: 2021 Facelift Score: 8 / 10 “The MG ZS EV has always been a no-nonsense electric family car, and this latest version only builds on that. The much longer electric range really increases its appeal, as does its much-improved interior.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 8.2 / 10 “The MG ZS EV is a surprise hit thanks to a powerful electric motor, excellent practicality and bargain price.” (Ben Custard) Read review
Carwow
Model reviewed: Score: 7 / 10 “If you’re in the market for a spacious and affordable EV, the MG ZS EV could be for you. It has plenty of practicality to offer, but be wary of overall refinement issues.” Read review
Company Car Today
Model reviewed: 44.5kWh Exclusive Score: 7.2 / 10 “The MG ZS EV has its flaws around the driving experience, infotainment and some areas of cabin quality, but the costs equation stacks up very nicely and it looks smart.” Read review
Daily Mirror
Score: 6 / 10 “Affordable electric vehicle that’s value for money.” Read review
Driving Electric
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The MG ZS EV is a well-equipped and practical small electric family car, with the new Long Range version offering impressive range at an affordable price.” (Richard Ingram) Read review
Electrifying.com
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7 / 10 “While it isn’t sporty to drive like you might expect from a car wearing an MG badge, the ZS EV is a practical family electric car. Its strong points are a good range and a long warranty, both of which give you peace of mind.” Read review
Eurekar
Model reviewed: ZS EV Trophy “The new Trophy model is a welcome freshening up of the ZS EV with the longer mileage range a big plus factor for many drivers and with the interior changes made still makes it one of the more affordable, practical and comfortable compact SUVs currently in the market.” Read review
Green Car Guide
Model reviewed: Trophy Connect Score: 7 / 10 “The MG ZS EV is basically a good car to drive. and it’s also practical. Perhaps most importantly, it’s one of the more affordable electric cars, and motorists need as many affordable electric cars as possible. However the infotainment system falls well short of most rivals, and a steering column that’s adjustable for reach would be a useful improvement.” (Paul Clarke) Read review
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7 / 10 “The MG ZS EV is an all-electric compact SUV that’s good to drive, a practical size, and it’s also relatively affordable.” Read review
Heycar
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “There simply isn’t an electric car on the market that represents as impressive value for money as the MG ZS EV. Upgrades in 2021 mean it’s more useable than ever. You still get a generous amount of standard equipment, too, while a seven-year warranty should put your mind at ease.” Read review
Honest John
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “There aren’t many new car bargains these days but we reckon the MG ZS EV is one of them. A recently upgraded battery means it now has a genuinely competitive range, while the new infotainment system is just as good as you’ll find in mainstream.” Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7.6 / 10 ”Good value, decent driver-assistance tech and long range.“ (Murray Scullion) Read review
The Sunday Times
Model reviewed: Range review “The ZS EV looks like a conventional SUV crossover at first glance, and MG says there haven’t been any practicality compromises in creating the electric model, thanks to some clever packaging around the battery pack.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: 72kWh Trophy long range Score: 8 / 10 “The MG ZS feels old fashioned in good and bad ways, but more importantly it isn’t as efficient as rivals which are coming to the market in their droves. The fact remains, however, that the MG fills a gap for those who simply want a battery car without frills or fancies and at a keen price.” Read review
Top Gear
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 6 / 10 “Granted, the MG ZS EV is not a car that lives in the very heart of Top Gear’s mental terrain. But it has some compelling aspects. If you’re the person in your social circle who ‘knows about cars’, you’re going to be asked about it. After all, people have heard of MG now. In the UK, MG outsells Renault.” (Paul Horrell) Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
Despite its budget price tag, the MG ZS EV scored a top five-star safety rating from Euro NCAP when it was launched in 2019. This score was better than several more expensive vehicles.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
The MG ZS EV was not assessed by Green NCAP during its production life.
The Green NCAP programme measures exhaust pollution (which is zero for an electric car) and energy efficiency. Electric cars are much more energy-efficient than combustion cars, so the ZS EV would likely have scored very highly in Green NCAP testing if it had taken place.
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
No reliability rating
As of June 2025, we don’t have enough reliability data on the MG ZS EV to generate a reliability rating.
The Car Expert’s reliability information is provided exclusively for us using warranty data from our partner, MotorEasy. As soon as MotorEasy has sufficient data on the ZS EV, we’ll publish the score here.
Running cost rating
Monthly cost of ownership data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by Clear Vehicle Data
Battery range
Average
Score
Variation
Score
EV models
207 miles
B
163 – 273 miles
B – C
Electrical efficiency
Average
Score
Variation
Score
EV models
3.8 m/KWh
C
3.6 – 3.9 m/KWh
C – D
Insurance group
Average
Score
Variation
Score
All models
25
B
21 – 28
A – B
Service and maintenance
Cost
Score
Year 1
£141
A
Year 2
£354
A
Year 3
£585
A
Year 4
£715
A
Year 5
£989
A
Overall
£2,784
A
In addition to the MG ZS EV’s rather affordable price tag, the SUV is also very cheap to run. It’s electrical efficiency (the EV equivalent of miles per gallon for a petrol or diesel car) is decent, while insurance premiums should be good compared to other cars as well. But the even better news is that scheduled servicing costs for the ZS EV are excellent.
In addition, an official battery range of 235 miles (which varies from 163 miles to 273 miles, depending on which model you choose) is just above average. So you shouldn’t need to worry about running out of charge in normal day-to-day driving.
Awards
Trophies, prizes and awards that the MG ZS EV has received
2022
Carbuyer Awards – Best Family Electric Car
2020
Company Car & Van Awards – Best Medium EV
Southern Group of Motoring Writers Awards – Dark Horse of the Year
Similar cars
If you’re looking at the MG ZS EV, you might also be interested in these alternatives
The MG ZS EV launched against a small number of direct rivals but, by the time it ended production, the segment had exploded in choice and quality. The ZS EV’s key advantage throughout its life was its very keen pricing, which undercut most rivals by thousands of pounds.
Find your next new or used car with Auto Trader. Find out more
Find your next new or used car with Carwow. Find out more
Subscribe to an MG ZS EV
Subscriptions are becoming a very popular way for consumers to try an electric car for a few weeks or months to help decide whether it’s a suitable alternative to a petrol car. If you’re interested in a car subscription, The Car Expert’s partners can help. (PS: What’s a car subscription?)
The negative effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on the new and used car markets was not as bad as first thought, new research has shown.
The fresh findings, from automotive servicing and repair company Kwik Fit, suggest that 3.8 million drivers have potentially put off a planned car purchase because of Covid. But this was largely offset by the fact that up to 3.2 million drivers were prompted by the impact of the pandemic to buy a new or used vehicle.
The majority of these car purchases were made by younger drivers: 16% of motorists aged 18-34 (2 million motorists) said the coronavirus issue prompted them to look for some new wheels. A further 1.2 million drivers (4%) aged 35 or over, bought a new car.
Kwik Fit’s research examined the reasons behind the pandemic purchases and found that a third (33%) of buyers said they were able to get a better car than they otherwise would have done because the price was lower than expected.
Three in ten (30%) prompted by the pandemic into a car purchase said they had a new job which required more travelling, so they bought a better car.
Another reason given for buying a new car is a potentially worrying sign for rush hour traffic levels: a quarter (24%) of respondents said Covid had prompted them to get a better model as they will be using it more for commuting to avoid public transport.
Holiday or weekend travel was in the minds of other drivers, with 7% saying that as a result of the pandemic they bought a car more suitable for going on domestic holidays rather than flying abroad.
The last 15 months have placed a huge burden on many people’s budgets. Kwik Fit found that while nearly a fifth (18%) of drivers who bought a new car because of the pandemic say they thought they could get a good deal as prices were reduced, the same proportion said they opted for a cheaper car because of the financial pressure caused by Covid.
And 30% of those who said they bought a new or used car because of the pandemic chose a hybrid or fully electric model, far outstripping low emission vehicles’ percentage share of all new and used car purchases.
“Like so many sectors, the automotive industry has been going through a very tough time during the pandemic,” says Roger Griggs, Kwik Fit communications director. “Our research shows that some drivers were badly impacted by Covid while, for a variety of reasons, other drivers were prompted by the pandemic to buy a new vehicle.
“As we come to the point where restrictions are almost fully removed, people will be settling into new travel patterns or re-establishing old ones and we expect to see even more drivers assessing whether their current car is the right one for their ongoing needs.”
Having an emergency vehicle come rushing up behind you on the road can cause panic in lots of drivers. The noise of the sirens and glare of the flashing lights add to the pressure of trying to get out of the way so the vehicle can attend to its emergency.
Or maybe you’re sitting in heavy traffic and an ambulance is trying to get through the gridlock. What are you supposed to do? Should you cross into an intersection or mount a kerb to get out of the way?
Stay calm, stay alert
Often you will hear the siren of an emergency vehicle before you see the flashing lights (unless you are one of those delightful individuals who has the music turned all the way up and would be unable to hear a nuclear explosion right next to you).
Work out where the sound is coming from and look for opportunities to move over to the side of the road. There’s no rush; far better to take a few moments to make sure there are no cyclists in your blind spot or other cars also trying to dive out of the way.
Even if an emergency vehicle suddenly appears in your mirrors with lights flashing and siren blaring, the same thing applies. Keep calm and follow your normal ‘mirror, signal, manoeuvre’ routine. The few seconds that it takes may avoid an accident by ensuring that you don’t move over on another road user, and the emergency vehicle can understand exactly what you’re doing rather than trying to guess.
(c) DVSA
Panicking and swerving wildly or hitting the brakes is only likely to lead to an accident and require more emergency vehicles.
Police, ambulance, fire and other emergency drivers are trained to deal with negotiating traffic, and they are allowed to break traffic laws if they are in an emergency situation (lights and sirens going). What they need you to do is be calm, courteous, safe and predictable so they can get past quickly and safely.
“Emergency and Incident Support vehicles. You should look and listen for ambulances, fire engines, police, doctors or other emergency vehicles using flashing blue, red or green lights and sirens or flashing headlights, or traffic officer and incident support vehicles using flashing amber lights. When one approaches, do not panic. Consider the route of such a vehicle and take appropriate action to let it pass, while complying with all traffic signs. If necessary, pull to the side of the road and stop, but try to avoid stopping before the brow of a hill, a bend or narrow section of road. Do not endanger yourself, other road users or pedestrians and avoid mounting the kerb. Do not brake harshly on approach to a junction or roundabout, as a following vehicle may not have the same view as you.”
The key phrase here is “… take appropriate action to let is pass, while complying with all traffic signs.” In other words, don’t ignore traffic signs (including traffic lights).
Although the above rule is probably not very well written and does not state it clearly, there is nothing in the Highway Code which says you can break the law to assist an emergency vehicle.
Don’t break the law unless instructed to by police
City streets can be a navigational nightmare for emergency vehicles, as they try to thread their way through a gridlock of cars, buses and vans. When traffic is at a standstill, drivers will often try to help by moving into an intersection, roundabout or bus lane to get out of the way. However, as much as you are trying to do the right thing, this is usually the wrong move.
If an emergency vehicle driver can see there is no clear path through stationary traffic, like a set of traffic lights, they will often switch off the lights and sirens and wait for an opportunity to move again (like the lights changing).
Official advice from police departments across the country is not to break the law to assist an emergency vehicle unless a police officer instructs you to do so. There are a number of reasons for this, but largely it is a bigger-picture approach to road safety. If you move against a red light into an intersection, you may move into the path of a vehicle coming from another direction that has not seen the emergency vehicle. You may be putting yourself and other road users in danger.
But I’m trying to help!
It often seems like the right thing to do, to pull across into a bus lane or ignore a red light and edge into an intersection to let an emergency vehicle through. However, it may not be helping at all.
Emergency vehicles will often use bus lanes to bypass lots of stationary or slow-moving cars, so pulling over into the bus lane might simply put you in the way and make life harder for the ambulance or police car trying to get wherever it’s going.
Can I be fined for breaking the law to assist an emergency vehicle?
Yes, you can. Councils and local authorities are heartless bureaucracies at the best of times, but in this case they do have the law on their side. There is nothing in the Highway Code which says you can break the law if you are trying to get out of the way of an emergency vehicle.
The internet is full of stories of drivers who are upset because they have been fined by automated camera systems for entering bus lanes or intersections to try and make way for an emergency vehicle to get past.
There are also plenty of stories and old wives’ tales about how you can write to the relevant authority and explain how you were trying to assist an emergency vehicle, but there are no legal provisions to get you out of a traffic penalty. Sometimes these fines are withdrawn if the driver appeals and there is supporting evidence, but certainly not always.
Finally, remember there may be more than one vehicle
If you have pulled over or moved out of the way of an emergency vehicle, don’t blindly pull back out again once it has passed.
There are often multiple police cars, ambulances or fire appliances heading towards the same incident, so you may have let one vehicle past and then pulled straight back into the path of another one following behind.
Also, there will be other vehicles who have taken avoiding action who are also looking to continue their journey, so be aware that other road users around you are all trying to re-enter the road space at the same time.
The positive tone of April and May continued through into June as new car sales continue to return to normality – although still well short of pre-pandemic levels.
However, the picture was complicated by several manufacturers running into severe parts shortages brought on by pandemic shutdowns. The big-selling Mercedes-Benz A-Class, which had been third in the year’s sales charts, disappeared out of the top ten in June.
Porsche and Land Rover also seemed to suffer more than most, with their sales numbers well down. On the other hand, some car companies did very well – as we’ll see below. It was a tight battle for best-selling supermini this month, with small hatchbacks filling fourth to eighth places with some very small margins between them.
We’ve covered the detail of the monthly registration results already this week, so let’s look at the top-selling cars of the month.
The Tesla Model 3 wasn’t just the country’s best-selling electric car, it was the best-selling car of all. The American company has certainly found the magic recipe to lure thousands of petrol and diesel car owners over to its popular electric saloon, which will have long-standing manufacturers scratching their heads as to why their own electric models are not selling up a storm in the same way.
The Tesla Model 3 currently holds an Expert Rating of 86% according to our industry-leading Expert Rating index, which is much higher than an Audi A4 or Mercedes C-Class, and just behind the BMW 3 Series.
Another great month for the Volkswagen Golf, after it topped the charts in May, means that it has overtaken the Mercedes-Benz A-Class in year-to-date sales to sit third at the year’s halfway point. After a slow start to the year, the Golf is now delivering consistently strong sales for Volkswagen – helped by surging fleet registrations.
As more local reviews of different UK-spec Golf models have been published in the media, the Golf’s initial stellar Expert Rating slipped from a high of 85% to its current level of 80%. The much-vaunted ‘all-digital’ interior has drawn criticism from reviewers, who have found it inferior to the more conventional cabin of the previous-generation model.
The top-selling Ford this month was once again the talented little Puma SUV, which reached new heights to sit in third place. On the one hand, it’s good news for Ford to have another big-selling model in the family. But on the other hand, this is hurting sales of the Fiesta, which is falling further behind the Vauxhall Corsa in year-to-date sales.
June’s strong result has also lifted the Puma above the Nissan Qashqai to sit fifth in year-to-date registrations at the halfway mark of 2021.
Ford’s junior crossover has been popular with critics, currently holding a rating of 82% on our unique Expert Rating index. This remains a best-in-class score for supermini SUVs, but it has slipped a few points in the last few months as we’ve added some new reviews and other sources have revised their initial opinions.
Despite slipping back to fourth place in June, the Vauxhall Corsa extended its lead at the top of the charts over the Ford Fiesta. That means that the Vauxhall now holds a sales lead of almost 3,000 units at the halfway mark for the year, and it looks increasingly likely that the Corsa will finally wrest the best-selling car crown away from its arch rival after about a decade on top for the Fiesta.
The petrol and diesel versions of the new Corsa currently hold an Expert Rating of 72% on our industry-leading Expert Rating index, suggesting that journalists are not as excited about the Corsa as customers. That score puts it in the bottom half of the supermini class, although the all-electric Corsa-e does score slightly better with an Expert Rating of 74%.
The year is not really getting any better for the Fiesta, although June was at least an improvement on May. At half-time in the 2021 sales race, the Fiesta is nearly 3,000 registrations behind the Vauxhall Corsa and there doesn’t seem to be any indication that it is going to close the gap, let alone overhaul its rival.
The Blue Oval brand’s dominance of the new car market is also slipping compared to its usual lofty standards. Overall, Ford was third in registrations for June, a long way behind Volkswagen and only fractionally ahead of BMW.
The Fiesta’s struggle becomes starker when you compare pre-pandemic results. Compared to 2019, the new car market is down about 28% at the end of June. However, the Fiesta is down by more than 50% for the same period, so Ford is literally shifting half the number of Fiestas it was two years ago. By comparison, the Corsa is down by less than 19%, so its net gain on the Fiesta has been enormous.
The Fiesta currently holds an Expert Rating of 81% in The Car Expert’s unique Expert Rating index, which aggregates reviews from 25 of the UK’s top motoring websites. That’s some 9% better than the Corsa, so the motoring media still clearly prefers the Ford even if customers currently say otherwise.
It was a bit of a fall for the Polo, dropping from third in May to sixth in June, although it was in the middle of a close battle with the Fiesta just ahead of it and the Toyota Yaris and Mini hatch just behind it.
A second strong month in a row also lifted the Polo from tenth to eighth in year-to-date registrations as the year hit the halfway mark, deposing the BMW 3 Series and Volvo XC40. The success of the Polo and Golf in June also helped Volkswagen to comfortably retain top spot in the charts for best-selling manufacturers, with sister brand Audi holding second place and eternal market leader Ford just edging out BMW for third.
The Polo holds an Expert Rating of 80% in The Car Expert’s New Car Ratings calculator, which is good but still a few points behind its Spanish cousin, the SEAT Ibiza. A facelifted model has just been announced, which is expected to arrive here in the UK in the next month or two.
It was another step forward for the Toyota Yaris in June, improving from in eighth place in May up to seventh – and only six registrations behind the Polo in sixth place. This also helped lift it into the top ten cars in year-to-date sales.
The Yaris currently holds an overall score of 76% on our Expert Rating index, which is several points behind the Ford Fiesta and Volkswagen Polo, although about four points ahead of the Vauxhall Corsa. It has received a number of awards in recent months, including European Car of the Year 2021, so it may be that the Yaris is going to become a far more regular sight in the top ten than its unloved predecessor.
Another facelift for the ageing Mini hatch has helped keep sales ticking over as it continues to occupy space in the bottom half of the top ten. Eighth this month was one step better than ninth in May, although not enough for the Mini to break into the top ten for year-to-date sales.
Despite being the oldest car in the top ten, the Mini hatch still holds a very solid score of 80% in our Expert Ratings aggregator, which is better than most cars in its class. The new Mini Electric model dosn’t score so well, with an Expert Rating of only 73% – although this may change by a few points (either up or down) once the facelifted version is reviewed.
The BMW 3 Series returned to the top ten for the first time since March. With its ninth place in the top ten this month, it holds the same position in year-to-date sales. Strong fleet registrations over the second quarter of the year will have certainly helped that, as the 3 Series has always been a popular company car.
The 3 Series currently rates one point better than the electric Tesla Model 3 in our Expert Rating index, and a long way ahead of other petrol/diesel/plug-in rivals from Audi, Mercedes and others. As of July 2021, it has an overall score of 87%, which is exceptionally high.
The current Kia Sportage is very much in run-out mode, with an all-new model unveiled in the last month that will arrive in the UK before the end of this year. Depending on how much stock of the current model Kia has available, that could mean either some very good deals to clear the decks or sales slowing down to a trickle as stocks are exhausted ahead of the new model’s arrival.
The Sportage currently holds an Expert Rating of 72% in our aggregated Expert Ratings index, which is midfield for medium SUVs but a couple of points behind the also-about-to-be-replaced Nissan Qashqai and quite a margin behind the top cars in the mid-size SUV segment. The new Sportage certainly has a much bolder and more distinctive look than the current model, and will be interesting to see whether buyers flock to it or look elsewhere.
The original Mercedes-Benz B-Class was first launched in 2005 as a small MPV. However, the current third-generation version of 2019 is now, more or less, a bigger variant of the A-class hatchback. Even the Mercedes-Benz website refers to it as a hatchback rather than an MPV.
As Carbuyer states: “The B-Class aims to blend the quality, refinement and high-tech interior of the A-Class with greater space and practicality.”
There’s plenty of powertrain choice in the Mercedes-Benz B-Class, with a selection of petrol, diesel and plug-in hybrid options on offer. On the road, testers generally describe it as comfortable to travel in but dull behind the wheel, though Car concludes: “It’s far from rubbish to drive.”
Interior space also scores with reviewers, although it further shows how Mercedes has abandoned any attempt to position the B-Class as an MPV – it’s lacking the usual seven-seat capability and the boot is not as big as you might expect. “There’s plenty of headroom front and rear, and legroom is acceptable,” says Company Car Today.
The interior finish comes in for more praise, Parkers describing it as “a vast improvement over the previous generation car” and highlighting the high-tech environment that has replaced previous dated buttons, especially the touchscreens which are dubbed best-in-class.
All this tech comes at a price, however, and several testers dub the B-Class an expensive option. “It’s fully loaded, although that’s going to cost you,” says The Telegraph and Company Car Today points out that some of the desirable tech is bundled into expensive options packs.
A facelifted B-Class arrived in the UK in late 2022 with minor updates to engines and trims. A plug-in hybrid version was previously offered but is no longer available. The B-Class is expected to end production at some point in 2025 and is not likely to be replaced.
As of July 2025, the Mercedes-Benz B-Class holds a New Car Expert Rating of B, with a score of 68%. It scores top marks for low CO2 emissions, while its safety rating and running costs are also good. However, its reliability record and media review scores are only average.
Body style: Five-door hatch Engines: petrol, diesel Price: From £35,965 on-road
Launched: Spring 2019 Last updated: Winter 2022/23 End of production: Late 2025?
Image gallery
Media reviews
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
Featured reviews
“The Mercedes-Benz B-Class is a tall, spacious family car that’s easy to drive and a good alternative to many modern SUVs. You’ll have to pay extra for lots of key features, though.”
Model reviewed: 2023 facelift range overview Score: 6 / 10 “The premium Mercedes B-Class MPV benefits from updates that move it further upmarket.” (Dean Gibson) Read review
Model reviewed: B 200 d Score: 7 / 10 “It’s a stretch to consider the Mercedes-Benz B-Class a full MPV, but if an A-Class isn’t quite roomy enough then it’s worthy of consideration. It gets the same gorgeous tech-laden dashboard and it feels much the same to drive. Compared to conventional MPV rivals, however, it’s pricey and not as spacious.” Read review
Auto Trader
Score: 8 / 10 “The B-Class is a small family car that builds on the A-Class hatchback by adding more space and practicality. It’s not particularly cheap, but it nevertheless offers a worthy alternative to the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “Pose factor will attract many small families to a Mercedes-Benz B-class, and it’s far from rubbish to drive. It’s got a little more personality than a Golf SV and blows the 2-Series Active Tourer out of the water for interior wow factor and available tech.” Read review
Car Keys
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre diesel automatic B 200d AMG Line Score: 8 / 10 “Mercedes-Benz has made vast improvements to the B-Class on this latest model. It now looks stylish and comes with a superb interior. By increasing in size, it’s also improved on the only real reason you would buy one over an A-Class – space and practicality.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8.2 / 10 “It’s not a true MPV, but the Mercedes-Benz B-Class excels as a spacious, classy hatchback.” (Andy Goodwin) Read review
Company Car Today
Model reviewed: 1.3-litre diesel automatic B200d AMG Line Score: 7.9 / 10 “Mercedes has successfully reinvigorated the B-Class, although it still won’t be a huge seller compared to the A-Class hatchback. Costs stack up well against rivals.” Read review
Eurekar
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre diesel automatic B 200 d AMG Line “The B-Class is a very smart evolution of what we would have previously called an MPV, although I am loath to dub this car with that title because it is so smart looking. It has the lovely AMG grille front and body styling which is about as far removed from a people carrier as you can get.” Read review
Heycar
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7 / 10 “The steadfastly sensible Mercedes-Benz B-Class ignores on-trend fads and focuses on what matters in a five-seat MPV: practicality and comfort. For those who value space higher than style, it’s worth checking out, even if it won’t jump out as a must-buy straight away.” Read review
Honest John
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 8 / 10 “In terms of the looks, it’s not going to win any style contests, but what the Mercedes-Benz B-Class does have is one of the best interiors around. Against the competition like the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer and Volkswagen Golf SV, the B-Class has a much fresher and more appealing cabin.” Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7.6 / 10 “Practical version of the popular A-Class hatchback.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre diesel automatic B 220d Score: 8 / 10 “Engulfed by a slough of SUVs, compact multi-purpose vehicles aren’t terribly popular any more, but when they are done as well as this you wonder why. It’s really expensive, but the equipment levels and driving experience just about justify the prices.” Read review
Top Gear
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 6 / 10 “New B-Class is, in essence, just a tall hatch… Good, but not as versatile as others.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
The current Mercedes-Benz B-Class was assessed by Euro NCAP in 2019 and scored a maximum five-star rating – the standard-fit autonomous emergency braking was praised, and the active safety systems scored maximum points for detection of cyclists.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
As of July 2025, the Mercedes-Benz B-Class has not been assessed by Green NCAP.
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
Total claims: 117 Average repair cost: £671.22 Last updated: April 2025
As of April 2025, the Mercedes-Benz B-Class is only average when it comes to reliability with a score of 55%, according to workshop and warranty data provided by our commercial partner, MotorEasy. This covers both the current model (2019 onwards) as well as earlier generations.
The average repair cost is also reasonably high at about £650. That’s obviously a lot more than the cost of a used car warranty, which is certainly worth considering if you own a B-Class or are thinking about buying one.
The most common problems reported for the B-Class are electrical system and suspension. Engine problems are not uncommon, and it’s worth noting that the average repair bill for engine problems is more than £1,400.
Make sure that any used car warranty you are purchasing covers all of these potential problem areas.
Running cost rating
Monthly cost of ownership data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by Clear Vehicle Data
Fuel consumption
Average
Score
Petrol models
44 mpg
C
Diesel models
53 mpg
B
Plug-in hybrid models
245 mpg
A
CO₂ output
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Petrol models
145 g/km
B
Diesel models
140 g/km
B
Plug-in hybrid models
26 g/km
A
Battery range
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Plug-in hybrid models
41 miles
D
Insurance group
Average
Score
Variation
Score
All models
23
A
Service and maintenance
Cost
Score
Year 1
£248
B
Year 2
£620
B
Year 3
£1,120
C
Year 4
£1,299
B
Year 5
£1,741
B
Overall
£5,028
B
Running costs for the Mercedes-Benz B-Class are reasonably good, according to numbers provided exclusively for The Car Expert by our data partner, Clear Vehicle Data.
Fuel consumption is average for petrol models but better for diesel versions. The plug-in hybrid looks amazing on paper, but this is misleading because of the way that the EU/UK government lab tests are conducted. There’s no way you’re going to drive for 245 miles on a single gallon (4.5 litres) of petrol and some electricity in the real world.
When running on its electric motor, the B-Class plug-in hybrid is quite efficient – although on any plug-in hybrid, the battery range is very limiting. You’ll need to keep it charged every day if you want to get the best economy out of it.
Insurance and servicing costs are better than average, which will help prevent your wallet from emptying itself at annual service time.
Warranty rating
New car warranty information for the Mercedes-Benz B-Class
Overall rating
B
68%
Petrol or diesel models
C
41%
Hybrid or plug-in hybrid models
A
82%
New car warranty duration
3 years
New car warranty mileage
Unlimited miles
Battery warranty duration
8 years
Battery warranty mileage
100,000 miles
Mercedes-Benz’s new car warranty is only average, and not as attractive as some other cars in a similar price bracket as the B-Class.
The duration is three years, with no limit on mileage – although, in reality, the mileage numbers are likely to be fairly irrelevant as most cars only cover about 10,000 miles each year.
In addition to the standard new car warranty, the B-Class plug-in hybrid models have an eight-year/100,000-mile warranty for the battery components. The overall rating above is a mix of the different models.
Recalls
Official DVSA safety recalls that have been issued for the Mercedes-Benz B-Class
2024
2021
2020
2019
Date: May 2024 Recall number: R/2024/166 Model types: All Build dates: 07/2018 to 01/2024 Number of vehicles affected: 10,590 Defect: On affected vehicles, the backup function of the steering software might not meet specifications. As a result, the steering power support might be impaired and a loss of steerability cannot be ruled out. Remedy: Update the software of the electric steering on the affected vehicles.
Date: March 2021 Recall number: R/2021/082 Model types: All Build dates: 05/2016 to 07/2020 Number of vehicles affected: 24 Defect: The communication module may be deactivated. Remedy: Carry out a check of the configuration of the communication module on affected vehicles and if necessary activate the communication module.
Date: October 2020 Recall number: R/2020/277 Model types: All Build dates: 12/2019 to 01/2020 Number of vehicles affected: 37 Defect: An electrical contacting inside the engine control unit might not meet the specification. Remedy: Replace the engine control unit on the affected vehicles.
Date: October 2020 Recall number: R/2020/262 Model types: All Build dates: 10/2019 to 06/2020 Number of vehicles affected: 1,074 Defect: The oil supply line of the turbocharger might leak. Remedy: Check the oil supply line of the turbocharger on the affected vehicles and replace it if necessary.
Date: September 2019 Recall number: R/2019/269 Model types: All Build dates: 02/2017 to 07/2019 Number of vehicles affected: 294 Defect: The software of the radar control unit might not meet the specification. Remedy: Update the software of the radar sensor control unit on the affected vehicles.
As of September 2024 (our most recent data point), there have been five DVSA vehicle safety recalls on the Mercedes-Benz B-Class to address different issues.
Not all vehicles are affected by recalls. You can check to see if your car is included in any of the above recalls by visiting the DVLA website or contacting your local Mercedes-Benz dealer.
If your car is affected by a recall, the vehicle must be repaired and you should not be charged for any work required. If you are buying a used B-Class, you should insist that any outstanding recall work is completed before you take delivery of the vehicle.
The Kia ProCeed is a sleek estate version of the Kia Ceed family hatch. This model was the third-generation version, which was launched in 2019 and discontinued in late 2024.
Kia described the ProCeed as a ‘shooting brake’, but this is misleading, as a shooting brake is an estate version of a coupé (Mercedes does the same thing). The ProCeed was simply a sleeker version of the normal Ceed Sportswagon estate that prioritised style over load capability. It certainly looked the part but was still reasonably practical. The Telegraph commented that, despite the sloping roof, the boot was only fractionally smaller than the ‘proper’ Ceed estate and bigger than several traditional estate rivals.
Engine choices were simple – standard was the 160hp 1.5-litre petrol, while GT versions got a 1.6-litre unit of 205hp. There were initially diesels and hybrids available, but these were discontinued as part of the model’s mid-life update in 2022. Entry-level GT-Line versions were fitted with a six-speed manual gearbox but most used a seven-speed automatic transmission.
Testers liked the efficient engines and the ProCeed’s general road manners, though Top Gear noted “it’s heavier than a normal Ceed and not the sporty, driver-pleasing solution Kia might have you believe.”
Equipment levels were extensive, as is usual with Kia, though one minus point was that pedestrian and cyclist detection on the autonomous braking only came as standard with the one manual model or the top GT-Line S – otherwise it was an option and such cars only got a four-star Euro NCAP safety rating as a result.
As of July 2025, the Kia ProCeed holds a Used Car Expert Rating of A, with a score of 70%. It scores top marks for its low running costs and Kia’s seven-year new car warranty, while its CO2 emissions are also lower than those for most vehicles. However, its media review scores and safety rating are only average.
Body style: Medium estate Engines: petrol, diesel Price when new: From £26,590
Launched: Spring 2019 Discontinued: Autumn 2024
Image gallery
Media reviews
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
Featured reviews
“The new Kia ProCeed is a worthy extension to the Ceed family car range. While it boasts a much more stylish exterior look, this does not come at the expense of practicality. In all other areas, it replicates the qualities that have already made its hatch sister a success.”
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol automatic GT-Line
“The Kia Proceed does an admirable job blending estate-car practicality with rakish coupe looks. It’s reasonably roomy inside and comes with lots of kit, but conventional hatchbacks are cheaper.”
Model reviewed: Used car range overview “This is certainly a car that looks the part, but the Kia Proceed’s beauty isn’t merely skin-deep. It’s enjoyable to drive, well made, well equipped and offers decent value for money, too. As a halo model for the Ceed range, even the cheapest editions are relatively luxurious, but venture further up the range and the ambience is noticeably better. The range-topping GT feels more special than most other estate cars available for the same money.” Author: Richard Dredge Read review
Model reviewed: 1.6-litre petrol automatic GT Score: 8 / 10 “Kia’s stylish shooting brake is a worthwhile range flagship” Read review
Score: 8 / 10 “It’s not quite at the top of its class for driving enjoyment or refinement, but impresses in both areas. If a Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake is out of budget, the Kia Proceed could be the ideal substitute.” Read review
Auto Trader
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8.2 / 10 “The Proceed sits in a niche as a car that’s more practical than a regular hatchback, and less practical but more stylish than an estate.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: Score: 6 / 10 “Most buyers will be going for the Proceed because of the way it looks, and the good news is it looks excellent in every trim level available, it’s just a shame that the GT trim isn’t as fun as it is in the hatch.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: Score: 8 / 10 “The Kia ProCeed drives more like a family car than a hot hatchback despite its stylish design, and big boot means it’s surprisingly practical too.” (Andy Goodwin) Read review
Evo
Model reviewed: 1.6-litre automatic GT Score: 7 / 10 “Unusual but appealing package is frustratingly short of fulfilling its potential.” Read review
Fleetworld
Model reviewed: 1.4-litre petrol GT-Line “As a compromise, sitting somewhere between an estate and a hatchback and with reasonable BIK and economy figures, it’s a pretty good one.” Read review
Honest John
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “In typical Kia fashion, the ProCeed offers excellent value for money. While it fills a gap in Kia’s line-up we didn’t realise was there, it’s a car that ticks all the boxes – especially when you consider its generous seven-year warranty.” Read review
Motors
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7 / 10 “Its stylish shooting brake shape and cool full-length LED rear light bar make it look like a seriously upmarket car – almost like a Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo, which is high praise indeed. It’s really the styling that’ll sway you towards the ProCeed over the somewhat bland Ceed Sportswagon.” Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7.8 / 10 “Sleek shooting brake is a stylish addition to the Ceed range.” Read review
The Sun
“With the same face as the Ceed five-door hatch, this Proceed is a sleeker, more coupe-like estate.” Read review
The Sunday Times
Model reviewed: GT Score: 6 / 10 “Kia’s stylish five-door gets sporty looks, more power and added practicality.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: 1.6-litre diesel manual GT Line Score: 8 / 10 “Kia has come up with an appealing alternative to the common-or-garden estate that isn’t a bulky SUV. Its list of positive attributes is pretty fulsome and, despite that tapering tail, it doesn’t want for boot space. Only poor rear visibility and lack of a more affordable version than this one mark it down.” Read review
Top Gear
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 6 / 10 “A refreshing niche that ain’t a crossover, but not as sporty as billed.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
The Kia Ceed family, including the ProCeed and XCeed models, has two separate Euro NCAP safety ratings depending on the level of equipment fitted to your car.
Lower-specification ProCeed GT-Line models do not get as much safety equipment as standard, so they get a four-star rating as shown above. Higher-specification GT-Line S models get an additional Advanced Driving Assistance Pack (available on lower-spec ProCeeds at additional cost), which earns them a five-star rating. This also bumps up the Vulnerable Road Users rating from 52% to 68%, and the Safety Assist Rating from 68% to 73%.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
The Kia ProCeed was not assessed by Green NCAP during its production life.
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
No reliability rating
As of July 2025, we don’t have enough reliability data on the Kia ProCeed to generate a reliability rating.
The Car Expert’s reliability information is provided exclusively to us using workshop and extended warranty data from our partner, MotorEasy, sourced from both official dealerships and independent workshops.
As soon as MotorEasy has sufficient data on the ProCeed, we’ll publish the results here.
Running cost rating
Monthly cost of ownership data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by Clear Vehicle Data
Fuel consumption
Average
Score
Petrol models
47 mpg
C
Diesel models
55 mpg
B
CO₂ output
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Petrol models
137 g/km
B
Diesel models
134 g/km
A
Insurance group
Average
Score
Variation
Score
All models
13
A
Service and maintenance
Cost
Score
Year 1
£180
A
Year 2
£452
A
Year 3
£727
A
Year 4
£902
A
Year 5
£1,207
A
Overall
£3,468
A
The Kia ProCeed is an affordable car to own and run, according to whole-life cost numbers provided exclusively to The Car Expert by our data partner, Clear Vehicle Data.
Fuel economy is only average for petrol models but good for (now discontinued) diesel-engined versions, although CO2 emissions are better.
Servicing and maintenance costs are very good for the car’s first five years, while insurance premiums should be very good as well.
Warranty rating
New car warranty information for the Kia ProCeed
Overall rating
A
85%
New car warranty duration
7 years
New car warranty mileage
100,000 miles
Kia’s new car warranty is one of the best in the new car market, and better than pretty much any rival brands in a similar price bracket to the ProCeed.
The duration is seven years, with a limit of 100,000 miles. This is good news for both new and used car buyers, as it helps the residual value of the ProCeed for new car buyers when they come to sell the car, and it gives near-new car buyers confidence that they are covered for years to come.
If you’re looking to buy a used car that is approaching the end of its warranty period, a used car warranty is usually a worthwhile investment. Check out The Car Expert’s guide to the best used car warranty providers, which will probably be cheaper than a warranty sold by a dealer.
Awards
Significant UK trophies and awards that the Kia ProCeed has received
2019
Scottish Car of the Year Awards – Best Estate Car
Red Dot Design Award
Similar cars
If you’re looking at the Kia ProCeed, you might also be interested in these alternatives
The Kia ProCeed’s low-slung estate body style means it has hardly any direct rivals, with Kia pitching it as a budget option to the Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake. However its practicality makes the car a viable contender to traditional estate versions of family cars, such as the Ford Focus and Volkswagen Golf.
The Ford Focus ST was the performance version of the fourth-generation Ford Focus. It was introduced in 2019 and discontinued in 2025 when Ford ended production of the Focus range.
Available with a 2.3-litre petrol engine producing 280hp, and briefly with a diesel option, the Ford Focus ST combined strong straight-line performance with chassis upgrades aimed at delivering sharper handling than the standard model.
UK media reviews were consistently positive, praising its balance, steering response and everyday usability. It was widely regarded as one of the more complete hot hatch options of its time.
However, ownership considerations were less favourable. Running costs were relatively high, particularly for fuel and insurance, and reliability data has been only average. Environmental performance was also unremarkable for the class, and warranty cover was limited when new.
Now available only on the used market, the Ford Focus ST presents a mixed proposition. It remains engaging to drive, but its long-term ownership record is less convincing than its media reputation suggests.
The Ford Focus ST currently holds a Used Car Expert Rating of C, with a score of 62%. Strong media review scores are offset by high running costs, average reliability, average safety performance and limited warranty cover.
“The Ford Focus ST is the quickest hot hatch Ford currently sells and it’s one of the most practical fast family cars around. Some less roomy alternatives are a little quicker, however.”
Model reviewed: ST Track Pack (2023) Score: 9 / 10 “The fourth generation Ford Focus ST isn’t the perfect hot hatchback, but the new Track Pack does wonders for its ride and handling.” Read review
Model reviewed: Automatic 2022 Score: 8 / 10 “The Ford Focus ST offers outright performance and chassis composure blended so skilfully with accessible entertainment value that it remains a true benchmark among its competitors. Some rivals are quicker but more serious-feeling and sometimes less fun. Others are miles more powerful, with four-wheel drive, but manage to make such small marginal gains as a result. The Focus ST remains an enduringly appealing hot-hatch sweet spot.” Read review
Model reviewed: ST Edition Score: 8 / 10 “For fast Ford fans the Focus ST Edition is the pinnacle, and it’s a fitting send-off before a newly updated ST arrives shortly. It looks the part, and the extras give a subtle extra breadth of ability, with more comfort and control than the ST – but it’s not night and day.” Read review
Model reviewed: Estate range Score: 8 / 10 “The new Ford Focus ST Estate offers all the thrills of the standard hot hatch, but in a more practical package.” Read review
Business Car
Model reviewed: Line X Score: 7 / 10 “Ford has given the Fiesta a thorough work over, equalling a car that heads to retirement at the top of its game. If you’re still thinking of getting one, this Fiesta ST remains deserving of serious consideration against more modern rivals.” (Martyn Collins) Read review
Car
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 8 / 10 “Ford’s efforts with the new Focus ST have largely paid off.” Read review
Car Keys
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre diesel manual ST Estate Score: 8 / 10 “While a diesel estate might not seem the obvious choice for a sports model, this Focus ST makes a compelling case for itself with its mix of efficiency, performance and appealing styling.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: Hatchback range Score: 8.4 / 10 “The Ford Focus ST is one of the most exciting hot hatchbacks on sale but is no longer a cheap option when compared with its rivals.” (Andy Goodwin) Read review
Model reviewed: Estate range Score: 8.4 / 10 “The Ford Focus ST Estate is just as good to drive as the hatchback but has a much bigger boot.” (Ben Custard) Read review
Carwow
Model reviewed: Estate range “If you’re looking for hot hatch pace, but aren’t prepared to give up estate space, the Ford Focus ST Estate is happy to help.” Read review
Company Car Today
Model reviewed: 2.0-litre diesel manual estate “The Ford Focus ST looks great and makes an appealing case as an efficient performance diesel, but it can’t help feeling a little lukewarm compared with the full-fat petrol ST.” Read review
Daily Mirror
Model reviewed: 2.3-litre petrol manual estate Score: 8 / 10 “For some, the Ford Focus ST is a bit too toned down, but not for me. You get bespoke front and rear bumpers, a rear spoiler, black 19-inch alloys and red brake calipers. Enough to make the ST stand out as special, but not so much as to attract unwanted attention.” Read review
Evo
Model reviewed: Range overview (facelift range) Score: 8 / 10 “For 2022, Ford’s given the Focus range a refresh that’s carried across to the ST. Together with some updated styling and tech, there are a few other reasons why the updated ST might just have taken a few steps up the hot hatchback ladder.” (Jordan Katsianis) Read review
Model reviewed: Focus ST Edition Score: 9 / 10 “If a Focus ST is a must-buy, the Edition is an absolutely crucial upgrade, just don’t go expecting to outplay a Civic Type R or i30 N by doing so.” Read review
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 9 / 10 “The Focus ST is characterful, fast and capable: everything it needs to be to take on the class leaders.” Read review
Honest John
Model reviewed: Range overview “The petrol Ford Focus ST hits 62mph in less than 6.0 seconds – half a second quicker than the old model, and potentially as fast as the Honda Civic Type R.” Read review
Model reviewed: 2.3-litre petrol manual hatchback “The Focus ST has in recent years lived in the shadow of the smaller Fiesta ST, and we suspect it will continue to do so. It’s quick and good to drive, but there’s no shortage of cars that are quick and good to drive. The Focus ST is easy to live with, but keen drivers will find more excitement in rivals.” Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Range overview (facelift range) Score: 8.4 / 10 “If driving thrills are at the top of your list of priorities but you still need a thoroughly practical family car, the Ford Focus ST hot hatch is well worth a look. It’s got plenty of space inside for passengers, and the estate version offers extra boot space if the hatchback isn’t big enough.” (CJ Hubbard) Read review
The Scotsman
Score: 8 / 10 “As Ford prepares to discontinue the Focus, the latest ST honours the hot hatch ideal as a thrilling family car.” Author: Matt Allan Read review
The Sun
Model reviewed: 2.3-litre petrol Estate “The ST estate is the best Focus ST I’ve yet driven and a fantastic fast family Ford. There’s no denying how brilliant that storming drivetrain is in a smart-looking machine like this, which can convincingly lap a track one minute and then heft a load of junk to the tip the next.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: 2.3-litre petrol manual hatchback Score: 8 / 10 “It’s hard to resist the Jekyll and Hyde nature of this souped-up Ford. You could use it as a daily driver then take it to a racing circuit. With performance that in some aspects surpasses the most recent Focus RS, the ST is an astonishing car with a terrific engine.” Read review
Top Gear
Model reviewed: Range overview (facelift range) Score: 7 / 10 “All told the Focus ST remains a quietly great all-rounder, but one that’s no longer a conspicuous bargain or the most rambunctious car in its class, which may mean it struggles to stand out from a talented crowd.” Read review
The Ford Focus ST shares its safety score with the regular Focus, which was tested by Euro NCAP back in 2019 and awarded a five-star rating. However, this rating expired in January 2026 and is no longer valid as the car no longer meets the standards required for such a rating. This is normal practice, as Euro NCAP reviews its ratings on most cars annually with most ratings expiring after about six or seven years.
Although the rating has now expired, the score is still useful if you are comparing a used Focus ST to vehicles of similar age – whose ratings will have probably also expired.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
The Ford Focus ST was not assessed by Green NCAP during its production life.
Running cost rating
Monthly cost of ownership data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by Clear Vehicle Data
Fuel consumption
Average
Score
Petrol models
34 mpg
D
Diesel models
58 mpg
B
CO₂ output
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Petrol models
183 g/km
D
Diesel models
126 g/km
B
Insurance group
Average
Score
Variation
Score
All models
27
C
Service and maintenance
Cost
Score
Year 1
£310
D
Year 2
£758
D
Year 3
£1,179
D
Year 4
£1,391
D
Year 5
£1,897
D
Overall
£5,535
D
The Ford Focus ST is a relatively expensive car to own and run, according to whole-life cost numbers provided exclusively to The Car Expert by our data partner, Clear Vehicle Data.
Fuel economy for petrol models is poor, while diesel models are notably better. This is mirrored in CO2 emissions, unsurprisingly. Insurance premiums are comparatively low, but service and maintenance costs over the course of five years of ownership should be only middling – these have increased notably over the last 12 months, so Ford has clearly been bumping up its servicing prices…
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
Total claims: 991 Average repair cost: £651.22 Last updated: April 2025
The Ford Focus range, including the ST model, has a reasonable reliability score of 62%, according to workshop and warranty data provided exclusively to The Car Expert by our commercial partner, MotorEasy. This covers not just the current-model Focus, but previous models as well and all the powertrain options from entry-level diesels to top-spec ST and RS models, which is worth bearing in mind if you’re looking at a used car.
Of most concern is that engine problems are both the most common type of fault and also the most expensive, with an average repair bill of more than £1,100. Gearbox problems are also expensive and not uncommon.
The good is that other problems tend to be relatively inexpensive to repair. However, if you’re looking at a used Ford Focus ST then you should make sure any extended warranty cover you purchase covers all of these potential problem areas.
Warranty rating
New car warranty information for the Ford Focus ST
Overall rating
E
15%
New car warranty duration
3 years
New car warranty mileage
60,000 miles
Battery warranty duration
0 years
Battery warranty mileage
0 miles
Ford’s new car warranty is pretty much the bare minimum offered in the UK, with a duration of three years and a limit of 60,000 miles. Other rivals in the price bracket do better (and in some cases, much better).
Warranty on a used Ford Focus ST
If you are buying an ‘Approved Used’ Ford Focus ST from an official Ford Direct dealership, you will get a minimum two-year, unlimited-mileage warranty included.
If you are buying a used Ford Focus ST from an independent dealership, any warranty offered will vary and will probably be managed by a third-party warranty company.
If you are buying a used Ford Focus ST from a private seller, there are no warranty protections beyond any remaining portion of the original new car warranty.
If you’re looking to buy any used car that is approaching the end of its warranty period, a used car warranty is usually a worthwhile investment. Check out The Car Expert’s guide to the best used car warranty providers, which will probably be cheaper than a warranty sold by a dealer.de to the best used car warranty providers, which will probably be cheaper than a warranty sold by a dealer.
As of September 2024 (our most recent data point), there have been 20 DVSA vehicle safety recalls on the fourth-generation Ford Focus to address different issues. However, not all of these recalls necessarily applied to the Focus ST.
Not all vehicles are affected by recalls. You can check to see if your car is included in any of the above recalls by visiting the DVLA website or contacting your local Ford dealer.
If your car is affected by a recall, the vehicle must be repaired and you should not be charged for any work required. If you are buying a used Focus ST, you should insist that any outstanding recall work is completed before you take delivery of the vehicle.
There are so many hot hatch rivals to the Focus ST, challenging it on both aggressive performance and equally aggressive visuals. The most popular include the Honda Civic Type R, the Hyundai i30 N and the Renault Megane RS. Premium brands also get in the act, with the BMW M135i, the Mercedes-AMG A 35 and Audi S3 to choose from.
New car registration results for June were another step forward for the car industry as the UK reopens following repeated coronavirus shutdowns over the last 18 months.
More than 186,000 new cars were registered in June – nearly 20% on May’s figures, which were 11% up on April. While this will be a relief for car companies and dealerships, it’s still well down on June results from the last decade pre-pandemic.
Complicating matters was a serious supply shortfall for many manufacturers on some or all of their models. This has been caused by a global shortage of semiconductor computer chips that are crucial for the running of modern cars, causing many production lines to be slowed or even stopped as car companies wait for supplies. This is, unsurprisingly, a hangover of supplier shutdowns across the globe.
There were slightly more fleet buyers than private customers in June, which all looked fairly normal and was about what we used to expect before the pandemic craziness took hold. The overall numbers were (inevitably) less than the industry would like, but broadly in line with what we’ve been saying for ages – there’s been a steady decrease in new car registrations year-on-year since 2016, and if you ignore the outlier of last year, that trend is pretty steady.
Diesels hit new low – again
It does sound like a broken record, but diesel’s market share fell to its lowest-ever level in June, with just over 14% of the market (which includes mild hybrid diesel cars). That means that diesels were outsold by plug-in cars (full-electric and plug-in hybrid) for the first time. This was helped by a boatload of Teslas, which we’ll come to in a minute.
Petrol’s market share fell just below 60% as the market share of electrified cars (electric, plug-in hybrids and regular hybrids) accounted for a quarter of all registrations – another new record. This will be an inevitable trajectory for the foreseeable future, so we promise not mention it again until at least next month.
Good month, bad month
Volkswagen dominated the market again in June, with Audi once again taking second place ahead of a very close race for third place – Ford pipped BMW by just seven units. Mercedes-Benz slumped to eighth, behind Toyota, Vauxhall and Kia, thanks largely to a lack of A-Class stock.
Our usual analysis of which brands have outperformed the market and which have fallen behind is again rather pointless this month, with enormous variation across all the car companies.
Porsche and Land Rover took a big hit, with sales well down in an overall market that was up 28% on the same month last year. On a happier note, Subaru and Mazda both recorded big improvements on their results from the same time last year, which will keep the dealerships happy.
Tesla rocks the boat as the A-Class sinks without trace
The Tesla Model 3 topped the charts quite comfortably in June, ahead of the Volkswagen Golf and ever-improving Ford Puma. Meanwhile, the Mercedes-Benz A-Class vanished from the top ten along with the Nissan Qashqai – although Nissan at least has the excuse that it’s in the middle of switching over to an all-new model, which always affects both demand and supply as the old car makes way for the new.
That has meant a bit of leapfrogging in year-to-date registrations, with the Golf passing the A-Class to re-take third place as 2021 reaches its halfway point. The Ford Puma also overtook the Nissan Qashqai for fifth place, and the Volkswagen Polo also jumped the BMW 3 Series and the Volvo XC40, which is another car struggling for sales compared to a few months ago.
We’ll have a our usual look at the top ten later this week.
The Dacia Sandero Stepway first appeared in 2017 as a rugged, off-road themed variant of the Sandero supermini, dubbed Europe’s best-selling retail car. All-new versions of both models were launched in 2021.
The Stepway takes most Sandero sales in the UK and the reason it sells so well is because it is a cheap car, with prices starting from less than £16,000 in 2025. However, the budget focus earned the Stepway the wrong sort of headlines in 2021 – Euro NCAP awarded it an almost basement two-star crash-test rating due to its very basic active safety system.
Sandero Stepway models are available only with petrol engines. There’s a 1.0-litre of 90hp or a 100hp version that can also run on liquified petroleum gas (LPG), a rarity in today’s market. There’s also the option to replace the six-speed manual gearbox with an automatic.
Testers have generally liked the Sandero family, praising it for the interior space and equipment you get for a bargain price, and the same goes for the Stepway. Those basics include a good, adjustable driving position, lots of interior space with a bigger boot than most superminis, and the availability of such niceties as air conditioning, touchscreen navigation and Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity.
The Daily Telegraph comments that the Sandero Stepway is “a bargain basement hatchback with a tiny engine and an automatic gearbox that you might actually want to own,” but adds that “we find it hard to recommend a budget option if it means cutting a corner on safety”. Likewise, Which? has slapped the Sandero Stepway with a ‘Don’t Buy’ tag due its poor safety score.
As of February 2026, the Dacia Sandero Stepway holds a New Car Expert Rating of D with a score of 59%.
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
Auto Express
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 9 / 10 “The Dacia Sandero Stepway makes a great case for itself as an urban runabout, with rugged SUV-style looks, plenty of space and low running costs – all for the price of a bog-standard city car.” Author: Ellis Hyde, Alastair Crooks Read review
Model reviewed: 2023 facelift model Score: 9 / 10 “With the Stepway, Dacia has managed to make it feel like a genuinely competitive offering in the supermini segment, rather than one that relies on its headline price tag and falls short everywhere else. With low-budget rivals drying up, the jacked-up image has now become a bit of a USP for the Stepway, which only adds to its appeal.” Author: Alastair Crooks Read review
Model reviewed: 1.0-litre petrol/LPG manual TCe 100 Bi-Fuel Score: 9 / 10 “This is another hugely impressive Dacia. It does a brilliant job of disguising its budget car status and will have you checking the price list in disbelief. It now adds a fair dose of style and up-to-date tech to the original no frills formula, and is easy to live with.” Read review
Auto Trader
Model reviewed: Score: 9 / 10 “While the standard Sandero is the embodiment of Dacia’s bargain brand ethos the Sandero version offers a little more in the way of style and substance thanks to its chunkier crossover looks and some feelgood garnish for the fixtures and fittings.” Read review
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8.4 / 10 “Trendy crossover looks and a bargain price make the Stepway version of the Dacia Sandero an even more appealing choice for cost-conscious buyers.” Read review
Business Car
Model reviewed: 1.0-litre petrol manual Prestige Score: 8 / 10 “Dacia has made good strides with its latest models to appeal to buyers from more than just a cost basis, but we shouldn’t overlook the fact that the range still represents excellent value for money. And though the regular Sandero is cheaper still, for those keen on a crossover the Stepway’s cost proposition will demand strong consideration.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: 1.0-litre petrol/LPG manual Bi-Fuel Score: 8 / 10 “We really like the Dacia Sandero Stepway. Yes, it’s more expensive than the standard Sandero hatchback but it’s still an honest, likeable and comfortable family car.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: Score: 8.2 / 10 “Headline-grabbing price and improved features make the Dacia Sandero Stepway a tempting option.” (Andy Goodwin) Read review
Carwow
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7 / 10 “The Dacia Sandero Stepway is a great hatchback mimicking an SUV in a rather pointless way.” Read review
Heycar
Model reviewed: Score: 6 / 10 “With good fuel economy, plus low insurance and tax costs, the Dacia Sandero Stepway is already affordable before you consider it’s about half the price of the best small SUVs. It might not be sophisticated, but basic transport has never been better.” (Lawrence Allan) Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 7.8 / 10 “Brilliant value for money, much improved over old model.” Read review
Regit
Model reviewed: 1.0-litre petrol manual Prestige Score: 7 / 10 “Dacia enjoys an impressive reputation regarding reliability and frequently scores high in customer satisfaction surveys. That helps make the Dacia Sandero Stepway a model well worth checking out if you are on a fairly tight budget but want all the warranty rewards and prestige that go with a new car. Shame about the two-star Euro NCAP safety rating though.” Author: Maxine Ashford Read review
The Sun
Model reviewed: “I think I prefer the Dacia Sandero Stepway to the standard Sandero. Whatever car or trim you choose, you are guaranteed one thing from the new Sandero family and that’s comically cheap, carefree motoring in what feels like a much more expensive car.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: 1.0-liter petrol automatic Prestige Score: 6 / 10 “It’s a great all-rounder and terrific value, with one notable exception. You may be prepared to accept the Dacia Sandero Stepway’s crashworthiness as an expected by-product of its lower price, but we find it hard to recommend a budget option if it means cutting a corner on safety.” Read review
Top Gear
Model reviewed: 1.0-litre petrol/LPG manual Bi-Fuel Score: 8 / 10 “The Dacia Sandero Stepway is value for money without making you look cheap, less pretentious than other crossovers and actually a reasonably deft piece of design.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
The Dacia Sandero family (including the Sandero Stepway) scored a very poor two-star rating from Euro NCAP, which generated headlines in the motoring media and was a very disappointing result. However, a better understanding of why the Sandero was only rated two stars is important.
The Sandero scored reasonably well in terms of occupant protection for both adults and children in crash tests. It’s still short of the best small cars, but certainly adequate. If the overall rating was just based on crash performance, it would probably have been awarded four stars rather than two.
Where the Sandero really fell down was in its crash avoidance technology, which has become increasingly important in determining overall ratings – after all, it’s far better to avoid an accident altogether than to survive one. Compared to other small cars, the Dacia’s autonomous emergency braking system is more basic and unable to properly detect pedestrians or cyclists. It does better at avoiding other vehicles, but is still not as good as other small cars.
Given that many of the Sandero Stepway’s rivals are actually used cars from other brands based on older technology and older Euro NCAP standards, the overall two-star rating is not as bad as it sounds – although it’s still not good enough for a brand new car in 2023. In summary, the Sandero Stepway does an adequate job of protecting you in a crash but doesn’t do enough to actually avoid one in the first place.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
Clean Air Index: 6.1 / 10 Energy Efficiency Index: 4.8 / 10 Greenhouse Gas Index: 3.3 / 10
Notes on eco rating
Green NCAP tested the 90hp, 1.0-litre petrol manual version of the Dacia Sandero Stepway in June 2023. This rating does not apply to any other engine or gearbox.
Green NCAP said: “The car comes with a state-of-the-art exhaust aftertreatment system and scores an above-average 6.1/10 in the Clean Air Index. The petrol consumption is as can be expected for this type of vehicle and powertrain… enough for an Energy Efficiency Index of 4.8/10.
“Due to the unspectacular consumption figures and the addition of the upstream greenhouse gas emissions for the supply of the fuel, the Greenhouse Gas Index receives only 3.3 points out of 10 and the car misses the qualification for the additional robustness tests.”
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
Total claims: 14 Average repair cost: £419.72 Last updated: April 2025
The Dacia Sandero range (including the Stepway) is a very creditable 94%, according to extended warranty data from our commercial partner MotorEasy, which puts it well above average. The only caveat to this score is that it currently comes from a small number of data points, so could shift significantly as more claims are added to MotorEasy’s database.
This score applies to both the current (2020 onwards) and previous generations of the Sandero family, which is good news if you are considering a used Sandero of any kind.
The average repair cost to date is just over £420, which is dragged up by an average engine repair bill of nearly £1,900. Other repair costs (electrics, brakes, fuel system) are all quite low.
Running cost rating
Monthly cost of ownership data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by Clear Vehicle Data
Fuel consumption
Average
Score
Petrol models
50 mpg
C
CO₂ output
Average
Score
Variation
Score
Petrol models
129 g/km
B
Insurance group
Average
Score
Variation
Score
All models
13
A
Service and maintenance
Cost
Score
Year 1
£157
A
Year 2
£440
A
Year 3
£684
A
Year 4
£871
A
Year 5
£1,233
A
Overall
£3,385
A
Data provided by our partner Clear Vehicle Data backs up the Sandero Stepway’s reputation for long-term affordability.
Only available with petrol drivetrains, the crossover has an average fuel consumption, with low CO₂ emissions. Service and maintenance costs over a five-year period are very affordable too when compared to the market as a whole.
Awards
Trophies, prizes and awards that the Dacia Sandero Stepway has received
2023
Auto Trader Awards – Best Value New Car
2021
Scottish Car of the Year Awards – Best Small SUV/Crossover
Similar cars
If you’re looking at the Dacia Sandero Stepway, you might also be interested in these alternatives
There are few direct rivals to the Sandero Stepway’s combination of rugged looks and value, but one of the closest is the Suzuki Ignis, a mini SUV with lots of character, more economy but less space.
Ford offers a beefed-up ‘Active’ version of its mass-selling Fiesta – it’s a much better car than the Dacia but a whole lot more money. The MG ZS is also a traditional SUV of similar size to the Sandero stepway, but while budget it’s still not as cheap as the Dacia.
The BMW 7 Series has been the German brand’s flagship saloon since the 1970s. This model was launched in 2015, with a mid-life facelift in 2019. It ended production in 2022, replaced by an all-new model in 2023.
The 7 Series was available in standard and long-wheelbase versions. Powertrain options were many and varied over its production life, with up to 12 cylinders and 585hp. These comprise three petrol units, a pair of diesels and a plug-in hybrid. All apart from the base petrol model were available with all-wheel drive (known as xDrive in BMW-speak).
On the road, air suspension soaked up poor surfaces but several reviewers pointed out that unusually light steering took the edge off the overall driving experience.
Technology has always been leading-edge in this class and the BMW had plenty – the central ‘iDrive’ stick that controlled many functions was clever but, as Company Car Today pointed out, “as the sheer quantity of connected functions increases, it becomes ever harder to keep up with where to find and operate everything.”
Overall, the 2019 facelift brought the BMW closer to its long-time rival, the Mercedes-Benz S-Class. According to Autocar at the time, “choosing between them will largely fall down to which seat you plan on using most”.
As of February 2026, the BMW 7 Series holds a Used Car Expert Rating of E, with a score of 49%. This is largely thanks to its very high running costs and poor reliability record.
Highlighted reviews and road tests from across the UK automotive media. Click any of the boxes to view.
Auto Express
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “Long-wheelbase BMW 7 Series is hugely spacious and luxurious; few cars are better to sit in the back of.” Read review
Model reviewed: 3.0-litre petrol/electric plug-in hybrid 745Le xDrive Score: 8 / 10 “Around cities the car will happily stay in EV mode, but squeeze the throttle for a bit more power and the petrol engine will wake up.” Read review
Model reviewed: M760Li xDrive Score: 8 / 10 “The M badge sits well on the big 7 Series, turning it into a fast, fun saloon but without harming the car’s luxury credentials. It’s still a luxury car and a fitting flagship.” Read review
Auto Trader
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “In a luxury saloon market traditionally dominated by the Mercedes-Benz S-Class, the BMW 7 Series has to work that bit harder to be noticed, a recent update giving this flagship model an undeniably more assertive look. That’s matched with superb comfort, technology and refinement.” Read review
Car
Model reviewed: 4.4-litre petrol automatic 750i xDrive Score: 10 / 10 “Beautiful though the 750i’s V8 is to drive, it’s tough to recommend it over the more affordable, far more efficient and barely any less refined 730d. But the big petrol is worth a test drive, and don’t go blaming us if, regardless of all the disadvantages, you decide you simply must have it…” Read review
Model reviewed: 6.6-litre petrol automatic M760Li xDrive Score: 10 / 10 “The M760Li’s niche appeal is undeniable but equally something worthy of celebration: evidently there are plutocrats who love nothing more than taming a snaking stretch of B-road, emerging at their destination wearing a satisfied grin.” Read review
Car Keys
Model reviewed: 3.0-litre diesel automatic 730d Score: 8 / 10 “The BMW 7 Series is likely to be used for chauffeuring and as a high-end transport link – and for that, it really is an excellent option. However, if you’re after a car that offers excellent luxury and great driving dynamics then it’s great for that too.” Read review
Carbuyer
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8.4 / 10 “The latest BMW 7 Series sports a brash new grille, improved powertrains and even more tech” Read review
Carwow
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The BMW 7 Series offers high levels of quality, comfort and quiet but is also the best of its breed at going around corners. Its options are expensive, though, and the petrols are thirsty.” Read review
Company Car Today
Model reviewed: 730d M Sport “It’s a tough act to depose the phenomenal Mercedes S-Class, and the BMW 7 Series’ upgrade lacks a certain elegance with the huge new grille, but behind it is a supremely capable and high-tech car.” Read review
Daily Mail
Model reviewed: 745Le XDrive hybrid “It’s pretty nimble for a car of this size, taking twisty mountain roads with ease and having a real burst of speed and acceleration on long straights when required or desired.” Read review
Evo
Model reviewed: Range review Score: 8 / 10 “The 7 is not as ‘cool’ as an SUV, but its recipe is one with lots of appeal, and is just better than a big luxo-SUV could ever be.” Read review
Model reviewed: 750i xDrive Score: 8 / 10 “Fully revised 7-series offers greater refinement, more luxury and in 750i xDrive guise more performance.” Read review
Model reviewed: 6.6-litre petrol automatic M760Li xDrive Score: 6 / 10 “Fast and luxurious, but not enough of an M car.” Read review
Heycar
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “Luxury cars are all about wafting around with the minimum of fuss and maximum of comfort, and the BMW 7 Series is impeccable when it comes to how it deals with lumps, bumps and potholes. Its predecessor didn’t ride very well but there are no such problems with this generation.” Read review
Honest John
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “BMW’s 7 Series holds its head high in the rarefied and competitive luxury sector, up against the might of the Mercedes S-Class and Audi A8.” Read review
Motoring Research
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “The BMW 7 Series’ chief rival is the S-Class, but while it can’t match the Mercedes-Benz for ride comfort, it’s more rewarding to drive.” Read review
Motors
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “While the BMW 7 Series isn’t primarily focused on the driver, it is one of the better luxury cars for driving. Its carbon core construction makes it light for its size, helping it feel surprisingly manoeuvrable. However, it doesn’t quite live up to BMW’s image of being the ‘Ultimate Driving Machine’.” Read review
Parkers
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8.6 / 10 “An engaging driver’s car in a limousine world” Read review
The Sunday Times
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 8 / 10 “Those looking for comfort above all else will probably choose the Mercedes-Benz S-Class or an SUV. But if you want a luxury limousine that’s packed with gadgets and sporty to drive too, BMW’s got it licked.” Read review
The Telegraph
Model reviewed: 745e plug-in hybrid Score: 8 / 10 “The BMW 7 Series is the driver’s choice of the super-limo category and that premise doesn’t change with this facelift, even in PHEV guise. The huge grille won’t be to everyone’s taste, but the cabin upgrades are welcome even if the instrument graphics are fuzzy and crude.” Read review
Top Gear
Model reviewed: Range overview Score: 6 / 10 “The BMW 7 Series is a difficult car to love, because, well… look at it. It screams ostentatiousness and just a hint (okay, quite a lot) of visual insecurity. That’s a pity, because under its criminal e-fit face it’s a very talented limo – the best in its class to drive, in fact.” Read review
Safety rating
Independent crash test and safety ratings from Euro NCAP
No safety rating
The BMW 7 Series was not tested by Euro NCAP during its production life.
Eco rating
Independent economy and emissions ratings from Green NCAP
No eco rating
The BMW 7 Series was not tested by Green NCAP during its production life.
Reliability rating
Reliability data provided exclusively for The Car Expert by MotorEasy
Total claims: 231 Average repair cost: £904.44 Last updated: April 2025
The BMW 7 Series has a very poor reliability rating, according to extended warranty data provided to us by our commercial partner MotorEasy. This data covers this generation (2015 to 2022) as well as older 7 Series models.
Engine and gearbox problems are the most expensive to fix, with average repair bills of about £1,300 and £1,700 respectively. Suspension problems are the most common source of faults, with an unusually high average repair cost of £1,000 thanks to the car’s complex air suspension system.
If you own a BMW 7 Series, or you’re looking at buying a used 7 Series, make sure that any used car warranty you purchase covers all of the potential problem areas shown above.
Awards
Trophies, prizes and awards that the BMW 7 Series has received
2016
Professional Driver Awards – Car of the Year + Chauffeur Car of the Year
Similar cars
If you’re looking at the BMW 7 Series, you might also be interested in these alternatives
The traditional rivals to the BMW 7 Series have always been the Mercedes-Benz S-Class and the Audi A8. Also lining up against it is the Lexus LS, Jaguar’s XJ having now passed into history, while for those looking for even more luxury the Bentley Flying Spur and Maserati Quattroporte are also in the running.
One of the most common questions we get asked is how people can get approved for car finance if they are unemployed.
For a lot of people, having a car is essential for being able to get to work or generally get around. It’s true that many people are able to get by in a place like London by relying purely on tubes, trains and taxis. But if you live and work in places that are not as well served by public transport, it can be almost impossible.
But what if you don’t have a job? Can you get approved for car finance if you are unemployed?
The short answer is that it’s possible but often very difficult. Obviously, the finance company wants to know that you can afford to make your regular monthly finance payment every single month, and if you can’t show income then they will justifiably assume that you won’t be able to make payments.
If you have a regular source of income that isn’t necessarily a job, such as rental income from a property, that will be helpful as long as you can show that it is reliable income and is declared on your tax return. Plenty of people have unconventional income streams, but the point is that it has to be verifiable.
Odd jobs here and there, or handouts from mum and dad, are unlikely to be enough to convince a finance company to lend you money for a car.
The reality is that many lenders will simply refuse you a loan if you are unemployed, regardless of any mitigating circumstances. Lenders that are prepared to offer you a loan will almost certainly do so on poorer terms than you would be offered if you have a job.
But I’ve always had a job – this is just temporary
This is a very common situation – you can show that you’ve been happily employed for years, and that your future employment prospects are excellent. But you dont have a job right now.
If you have a solid employment history, it will certainly help in getting approved for car finance. But the reality is that some lenders will still simply say “no”. Others will say “yes”, but they will hit you with a higher interest rate and/or fees, or limit how much they are prepared to lend you.
The finance approval process is all about assessing risk. While obviously there’s no guarantee that having a job today will mean that you won’t suddenly be unemployed in three month’s time, it’s still a better bet than someone who doesn’t have a job now and can’t guarantee when they may start a new job.
It may sound unfair if you’ve had an unblemished employment history up until now, but the finance companies know the odds based on years and years of data, and it inevitably shows that people without jobs are more likely to run into financial trouble than people with jobs.
But I have enough money in my account to keep me going for months
Even if you’ve been a diligent saver and ensured you have a decent buffer to keep you going while you search for a new job, the finance company will still consider it a significant risk if you don’t have reliable and regular income.
For years it’s been a commonly repeated phrase that most people are only a couple of pay cheques from homelessness, and it’s still a pretty accurate situation. The coronavirus pandemic has certainly not helped this at all, and it could take years for the market to recover.
But my partner has a good job
This is very common, and may or may not be helpful. Most finance companies won’t allow joint applications for a car loan, but they may consider household income if you are married. If you’re not married, it’s usually not that helpful – that’s not banks making social judgments, it’s just looking at data that shows that married couples tend to have more stable finances than unmarried couples.
It may be that your partner/spouse can be a guarantor for your finance application, but this is less common than it is for parents to be able to act as a guarantor for their kids’ loans.
Is age a factor?
Yes, age will inevitably come into it, although it’s not necessarily a deciding factor. If you’re 22 years old and unemployed, you are likely to be seen as a higher risk than someone who’s 42 and unemployed because you’re unlikely to be able to show a stable employment history and a stable financial position.
When you’re younger, your financial position tends to be in a greater state of flux than when you’re older and have “settled down”. Over the term of the finance agreement (usually three to five years), your financial circumstances are likely to change more drastically than someone already in middle age.
Your income is more likely to increase over that time, but your expenses usually increase significantly as well. You’re also more likely to change jobs more often at a younger age (either by your own choice or against your will) compared to older people.
All of this adds risk for a lender, so if you are unemployed now then it very much works against you. Again, the finance companies base decisions on their data, and they have statistics that inform them of the relative risks.
Play the long game
The simple reality is that not having a job will drastically reduce your options for financing a car. Most people will find lenders who will provide them with a loan, but the terms are likely to be unfavourable.
Consider your options carefully, and be prepared to lower your expectations considerably. If you are genuinely convinced that you’re only in a short-term bind, then look for short-term solutions rather than tying yourself into a bad loan over a long period.
By short-term solutions, I don’t mean payday loans unless you are seriously desperate right now and extremely confident you can clear the debt in very short order – payday lenders thrive from borrowers who can’t clear their debts and get sucked into a downwards spiral of neverending problems.
Can you get by on public transport or taxis for a couple of months? If you’d normally be spending a few hundred pounds a month on a car loan and associated costs (insurance, fuel, servicing, road tax, etc.), that could cover a lot of bus tickets or taxi fares.
Riding your bike, car pooling with workmates or friends, renting a car on the occasions when you absolutely need it – there are usually options around (even if they’re not very good) that can keep you going in the short term so that you are in a much stronger position to make a loan application in the future.
Looking for an alternative to dealer finance?Here at The Car Expert, we are building commercial partnerships with companies who can offer you competitive car finance deals on either a new or used car. Check these out before signing any finance agreement with a car dealer:
